Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Alan J Carson a Department of Psychiatry, University
of Edinburgh, Royal Edinburgh Hospital, Edinburgh EH10 5HF, b Department of Clinical
Neuroscience, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital,
Edinburgh EH4 2XU
Correspondence to: A J Carson A.Carson{at}ed.ac.uk
Suicide is one of the ten most common causes of death
for both men and women in Great Britain.1 Psychiatric
disorders are the main risk factor, but numerous studies have also
identified physical illness as an important contributory
factor.
1 2
Although it is considered mandatory to enquire
about suicidal ideation in psychiatric consultations, this is seldom
part of a medical assessment. We aimed to examine suicidal ideation in a consecutive series of patients who had been newly referred to general
neurology outpatient clinics. The study was approved by the local
research ethics committee.
As part of another study,3 300 of 312 consecutive new
patients at the general neurology outpatient clinics at the Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, were interviewed using the primary care
evaluation of mental disorders (PRIME-MD) structured psychiatric interview schedule.4 As part of the interview all patients were asked: "In the last two weeks, have you had thoughts that you
would be better off dead or of hurting yourself in some way?"
Patients who answered yes were asked to describe the nature of these
thoughts. To be classed as experiencing suicidal ideation the patient
had to have thought about active plans for committing suicide Diagnoses of anxiety and depressive disorders that were made using the
structured interview were also recorded. After the clinical
consultation, the neurologists recorded the neurological diagnosis and
whether the patient required psychiatric or psychological assessment or treatment.
Before a patient attended the clinic the patient's general
practitioner was sent a brief questionnaire. The general practitioners were asked to indicate whether they believed that the patient required
psychiatric or psychological assessment or treatment.
At the time of assessment the researchers were blind to the
opinions of the neurologists and the general practitioners.
The clinical characteristics of the patients attending the clinics are
shown in the table. One in 11 patients (26/300) seen at the general
neurology clinics had given serious thought to committing suicide in
the past two weeks. Almost all of these patients (23/26) had major
depression. It might be assumed that suicidal ideation would be more
likely to occur in patients with progressive, debilitating neurological
conditions. However, this was not the case. Twelve of the 26 patients
who had experienced suicidal ideation had medically unexplained
symptoms, and most of the remainder had non-progressive
conditions.
Our findings do not support the view that suicidal ideation
occurring in neurology patients is largely a rational response to
progressive physical illness. Instead, the findings underscore the
importance of major depressive disorder in influencing the ways that
medically ill patients think about their illnesses and themselves.
The prevalence of 9% (95% confidence interval 6% to 12%) for
significant suicidal ideation described in this study is higher than
the 2-3% described as occurring in primary care and community settings
in the United States.5 We are unaware of any data that
indicate what proportion of those who are medically ill and who report
suicidal ideation actually go on to kill themselves. None the less,
suicidal ideation of the type considered important in this study is
clinically significant: it would be taken seriously during a
psychiatric consultation.
It is encouraging that 58% of those patients with suicidal
ideation were identified by either the general practitioner or the
neurologist as needing psychiatric or psychological assessment or
treatment. However, general practitioners and neurologists did not
always identify the same patients. This highlights the importance of
assessing the mental state of medically ill patients and the importance
of communication of the findings between general practitioners and specialists.
![]()
Participants, methods, and results
Top
Participants, methods, and...
Comment
References
such as buying tablets
nearly every day for the previous two
weeks. Whenever a patient reported such ideation the general practitioner was informed.
![]()
Comment
Top
Participants, methods, and...
Comment
References
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
Contributors: AC developed the primary hypothesis, discussed core ideas and study design, contributed to data collection and analysis, and participated in writing of the paper. SB assisted with data collection and analysis and contributed to writing the paper. CW and MS discussed core ideas and the design of the study and contributed to writing the paper. MS is guarantor for the paper.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Funding: This study was supported by the University of Edinburgh.
Competing interests: None declared.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Diekstra RFW. The epidemiology of suicide and parasuicide. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1993; 371(suppl): 9-20. |
| 2. |
Feinstein A.
Multiple sclerosis, depression, and suicide: clinicians should pay more attention to psychopathology.
BMJ
1997;
315:
691-692 |
| 3. |
Carson AJ, Ringbauer B, MacKenzie L, Warlow C, Sharpe M.
Neurological disease, emotional disorder and disability: they are related. A study of 300 consecutive new referrals to neurology outpatient clinics.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry
2000;
68:
202-206 |
| 4. | Spitzer RL, Williams JB, Kroenke K, Linzer M, deGruy FV, Hahn SR, et al. Utility of a new procedure for diagnosing mental disorders in primary care. The PRIME-MD 1000 study. JAMA 1994; 272: 1749-1756[Abstract]. |
| 5. |
Paykel ES, Myers JK, Lindenthal JJ, Tanner J.
Suicidal feelings in the general population. A prevalence study.
Br J Psychiatry
1974;
124:
460-469 |
(Accepted 24 February 2000)
Read all Rapid Responses
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+