Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Daniel Wight a MRC Social and
Public Health Sciences Unit, Glasgow G12 8RZ, b School of Mathematics and
Physical Sciences, Napier University, Merchiston, Edinburgh EH10
5DT, c School
of Social Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QN, d Department of
Sociology and Social Policy, University of Durham, Durham DH1 3JT
Correspondence to: D
Wight danny{at}msoc.mrc.gla.ac.uk
The proportion of young people who
have sexual intercourse before the age of 16 is
increasing.1 Previous studies have found that sexual
intercourse before the age of 16 is often regretted.
1 2
Reported regret might result, however, from re-evaluation from a more
mature perspective as most data have been reported retrospectively by
older respondents. We conducted a large scale survey (the first such
study in the United Kingdom) of sexual behaviour reported by young
people aged under 15.
In 1996 and 1997 a questionnaire was administered to all third
year pupils in 24 non-denominational state secondary schools in east
Scotland as part of a sex education trial.3 The
research was approved by Glasgow University's Ethics Committee for
Non-Clinical Research Involving Human Subjects and the relevant local
authorities' education departments. After a pilot study, questions
relating directly to sexual abuse were withdrawn as one education
department prohibited them. The questionnaire was administered
with both the young people's and their parents' consent by
researchers under "examination conditions" without teachers
present. An overall participation rate of 94% resulted in 7395 usable
questionnaires (3665 boys, 3730 girls; mean age 14 years 2 months
(with 95% aged between 13 years 6 months and 14 years 9 months)). The
sample was representative of 14 year olds throughout Scotland in terms of parents' social class and proportion of one parent households (1991 census data). Regretted sexual intercourse, measured on a three point
scale, was analysed by ordinal logistic regression (table).4 The proportional odds assumption was tested and
found to be tenable in all cases.
Experience of heterosexual intercourse was reported by 18.0% (661) of
boys and 15.4% (576) of girls, of whom 74.8% (873 from 1167 valid
responses) said that their first such experience had occurred since
their 13th birthday. For first intercourse 60.2% (735/1220) of
respondents reported using a condom throughout, 8.9% (109/1220) using
withdrawal, and 18.9% (230/1220) using no contraception. Corresponding
proportions for most recent intercourse were 60.7% (503/829), 8.7%
(72/829), and 17.4% (144/829). None of these contraceptive data varied
significantly by sex. A fifth of girls reported that they had been
under some kind of pressure to have sex at both first (19.8%
(112/566)) and most recent (18.1% (73/403)) intercourse, compared with
7.0% (45/640) and 9.1% (39/429) respectively for boys.
Two fifths (488; 263 boys, 225 girls) of all respondents said that
first intercourse "was at about the right time," but 32% of girls
and 27% of boys reported that it had happened too early, and 13% of
girls and 5% of boys stated that it should not have happened at all.
Such regret was not associated with social class, family composition,
or reported condom use for either boys or girls. For boys, reporting
that they had exerted pressure was associated with higher levels of
regret: no other variables were significantly related to regret. For
girls, however, all the variables presented in the table were
associated with regret in univariate analysis. In a multivariate
analysis of girls' data, reports of being pressured, exerting
pressure, not having planned sexual intercourse with their partner, and
relatively high levels of parental monitoring were significantly
related to regret.
Reports from young people with recent experience of sexual
intercourse showed higher levels of regret for boys and lower levels of
regret for girls than previously reported retrospectively by older
respondents.
1 2
For both sexes pressure surrounding the
event was associated with regret, and, for girls, relatively high
levels of parental monitoring and lack of prior planning with their
sexual partner were also significant. In short, for young women regret
seemed to be related to lack of control. Health promotion should aim to
help young people to develop relationship and negotiation skills.
Sexual health education focusing on such skills can increase control.
Moreover, anticipated regret is associated with subsequent
contraceptive use.5 Therefore, making young people aware
of the potential emotional and relationship consequences of early
sexual intercourse may delay first intercourse.
![]()
Methods and results
Top
Methods and results
Comment
References
![]()
Comment
Top
Methods and results
Comment
References
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
Contributors: DW, SS, CA, GR and GH designed the study and, with MH and KB, designed the questionnaire. MH, DW, KB, and GR collected the data, which were analysed and interpreted by MH, GR, and DW. DW drafted the first version of the paper, and MH assimilated comments; all authors contributed to the final draft. DW, MH, and GR are the guarantors.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Funding: Medical Research Council (United Kingdom).
Competing interests: None declared.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Johnson AM, Wadsworth J, Wellings K, Field J. Sexual attitudes and lifestyles. London: Blackwell Scientific, 1994. |
| 2. |
Dickson N, Paul C, Herbison P, Silva P.
First sexual intercourse: age, coercion, and later regrets reported by a birth cohort.
BMJ
1998;
316:
29-33 |
| 3. | Wight D. Does sex education make a difference? Health Education 1997; 2: 52-56. |
| 4. | SAS Institute. SAS logistic procedure, SAS STAT user's guide. Version 6.12. Cary, NC: 1996. |
| 5. | Richard R, van der Pligt J, de Vries NK. Anticipated regret and time perspective: changing sexual risk-taking behaviour. J Behav Decision Making 1996; 3: 263-277. |
(Accepted 24 January 2000)
Read all Rapid Responses