BMJ 2000;320:1119-1123 ( 22 April )
Clinical review
Regular review
Ulcerative colitis
Subrata Ghosh, consultant,
Alan Shand, specialist registrar,
Anne Ferguson, professor.
Gastrointestinal Unit, Department of Medical
Sciences, University of Edinburgh and Western General Hospital,
Edinburgh EH4 2XU
Correspondence to: S Ghosh sg{at}srv0.med.ed.ac.uk
Ulcerative colitis is a relapsing and remitting
disease characterised by acute non-infectious inflammation of the
colorectal mucosa. In the United Kingdom the annual incidence is around
7 cases per 100 000 population.1 The rectal mucosa is
invariably affected. Confluent inflammation and shallow ulceration
extend proximally from the anal margin. A patient may have proctitis, left sided colitis (the proximal limit being below the splenic flexure), extensive colitis (involving the transverse colon), or pan
colitis. At any point in time, 50% of patients are asymptomatic, 30%
have mild symptoms, and 20% have moderate to severe
symptoms.2 Many patients have long periods of complete
remission, but the cumulative probability of remaining free from
relapse at two years is only 20%, decreasing to less than 5% at 10 years.3 Later relapses generally affect the same region of
the colon as previous episodes.
Several of the current clinical and therapeutic issues in ulcerative
colitis include: (a) medical treatment options for
relapse and for maintenance of remission; (b) management
of the minority of patients who develop a severe life threatening
relapse or chronic unremitting disease; (c) surgical
treatment of ulcerative colitis; and (d) long term
complications in patients with extensive disease
namely, colonic and
biliary cancers and sclerosing cholangitis.
|
Summary points
Ulcerative colitis may present at any age, but the anatomical
distribution of involvement at presentation is different between
children and adults
All patients with bloody diarrhoea need to have infection excluded
Outpatient rigid sigmoidoscopy is the best method of diagnosing the
nature of inflammation
The extent of inflammation may be established by total colonoscopy (or
a double contrast barium enema)
The mainstays of treatment are rectal and systemic 5-aminosalicylic
acid derivatives and corticosteroids, with azathioprine in steroid
dependent or resistant cases
Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis should be
considered in every patient in whom colectomy is contemplated
|
 |
Methods |
We have based this review on our clinical and research experience
in gut immunology and inflammatory diseases together with information
from comprehensive monographs
3 4 5
and UK and US
guidelines on management.
6 7
We also searched Medline from 1985 to July 1999 using the search terms "ulcerative colitis" and "sclerosing cholangitis," which yielded 6116 and 889 citations respectively and other seminal papers.
 |
Clinical features and diagnosis |
Ulcerative colitis may present at any age. Men and women are
equally affected. In adults at presentation about 55% have proctitis, 30% left sided colitis, and 15% extensive colitis or pan colitis. In
children, only 25% present with proctitis alone, 30% have left sided
colitis, and in 45% the disease extends to the transverse colon or beyond.
Box 1 lists typical symptoms at presentation. Virtually all
patients with ulcerative colitis have rectal bleeding or bloody diarrhoea. Delays in presentation are common through such diverse reasons as fear of cancer or a general reluctance to discuss matters relating to bowel habit (box 2). Many patients may complain of pain of
colonic origin, often left sided and related to defecation. There
are no specific clinical signs on general examination, but inflammation of the rectal mucosa (proctitis) can readily be seen at
proctoscopy (fig 1).
|
Box 2
: Atypical symptoms at presentation or relapse
- Bleeding not recognised because of colour blindness
- Constipation proximal to severe proctitis
blood and mucus several
times daily, hard stool once or twice a week (olsalazine frequently
causes diarrhoea and may be a useful drug)
- Late stage tubular colon with failure of the capacity to concentrate
stool so the patient has watery diarrhoea without inflammation or
bleeding
- Faecal incontinence
at least 50% of patients with diarrhoea due to
ulcerative colitis are occasionally incontinent
- The patient does not recall an earlier episode of colitis but presents
with sclerosing cholangitis or colon cancer and dysplasia (even if
there are no current symptoms of ulcerative colitis, biopsies usually
show evidence of a previous total colitis)
- Chronic iron deficiency anaemia
usually there is a history of
diarrhoea on direct questioning
|
|
Patients with bloody diarrhoea need careful clinical evaluation.
After infection has been excluded in patients with colitis the nature
and extent of inflammation should be established by sigmoidoscopy and
biopsy and either total colonoscopy or double contrast barium enema
examination (fig 2). Sedation may be necessary for appraisal of the
rectal mucosa in an anxious child presenting for the first time. The
patient should be informed that rectal examination and sigmoidoscopy
are safe and usually painless and that they are performed routinely at
appointments to allow sensible treatment decisions to be made.
Sigmoidoscopy may be performed safely during pregnancy if considered
essential for management, but never total colonoscopy.
 |
Differential diagnosis |
The most difficult decision may be to establish whether the
diagnosis is ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease. It may be several
years after presentation that the clinical evolution allows a firm
decision to be made. Fortunately, unless surgery is contemplated the
management of colonic Crohn's disease is broadly similar to that of
ulcerative colitis. The table summarises the differences between
ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. In our view these are
different diseases. Otherwise the differential diagnosis includes anal
fissure (seen with proctoscopy), infectious
colitis (stool cultures for
bacterial pathogens, and careful examination of stools and biopsy
material for viral, parasitic, and protozoal infection are mandatory),
and pseudomembranous colitis (history of antibiotic exposure, toxin
assay for Clostridium difficile). Food sensitive colitis should be considered in infants8 and ischaemic
colitis, diverticulitis, and colonic tumours in
adults.

View larger version (99K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig 1.
Appearance of rectum in proctitis with
erythematous friable mucosa, loss of vascular pattern, and mucopus
|
|
 |
Causal and immunological aspects |
The cause remains unresolved, but current interest is focused on
defects in the mucous gel barrier, either primary or acquired by
bacterial sulphatases,9-11 low appendicectomy rates in
ulcerative colitis12 (even when smoking is controlled
for),13 and colonic sulphate reducing
bacteria.14 The existence of true autoimmunity in
ulcerative colitis is uncertain, and the evidence is
conflicting.
15 16
The balance between Th1 and Th2
phenotypes of T lymphocytes determines the characteristics of a chronic
inflammatory process. Th1 cells secrete proinflammatory cytokines such
as interleukin 2 and
interferon, whereas Th2 cells express
regulatory cytokines such as interleukin 4 and interleukin 10. Th2
responses have been shown to be important in atopy, a condition in
which altered humoral immunity is present, and existing data suggest
that ulcerative colitis more closely resembles a Th2 type
disease.17
 |
Management |
Analysis of the patient's illness
As in many chronic diseases, an appropriate plan of management
must be tailored to the patient's current anatomical, functional, and
"disease activity" status. Anatomical extent of grossly affected
colon, symptomatic disease activity, local and remote complications,
iatrogenic illnesses, nutrition, growth variables, social and
psychological factors, and coexistent diseases should all be considered
within a comprehensive management strategy.
Symptoms are the best guide towards disease
activity18 and their relief is the main treatment aim. It
may be difficult to decide whether remission has been achieved, and
this is a major problem in the design of clinical trials. Various
clinical indices have been devised, mainly based on subjective data.
The Powell-Tuck index19 is widely employed and is of
particular use in clinical trials where objective, reproducible
assessment of symptoms is vital. In practice, the Crohn's disease
activity index20 gives similar values to the Powell-Tuck
index (see fig B on website). Symptoms may remit but endoscopically
there may still be evidence of mucosal inflammation; histology often
remains abnormal long after complete clinical remission. Blood tests
indicating inflammatory activity, such as platelet and leucocyte
counts, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, or concentrations of C reactive
protein, although a useful adjunct, often merely confirm the overall
clinical impression. A new objective measure of gut inflammation (gut
protein loss measured by lavage fluid from the whole gut) measures the
same symptomatic, acute inflammatory component of overall illness as the Crohn's disease activity index, both in ulcerative colitis and
Crohn's disease in adults (see fig C on website).21 Tests based on whole gut lavage offer a different approach for assessing the
contribution of "disease activity" to overall illness, as well as
measuring the efficacy of treatment.
Medical treatment of typical relapse
In practice, rectal and systemic derivatives of
5-aminosalicylic acid and corticosteroids form the basis of medical
treatment (see table on website). Azathioprine may be used as a steroid
sparing agent. There is little to choose between the various
5-aminosalicylic acid preparations available. The use of
sulphasalazine, the oldest (and least expensive) of these, has become
less popular because of side effects including nausea, skin rashes, and
reversible oligospermia. Balsalazide, a colonic release preparation
that is azo bonded may be more effective and better tolerated than
mesalazine.22 Topical treatment is usually effective for
proctitis. Patients may need to be taught how to use formulations given
through the rectum. Rectal 5-aminosalicylic acid preparations and
corticosteroids are both effective in relieving symptoms and inducing
remission but the former is more effective.23 Patients
tolerate foam enema preparations better than liquid
enemas,24 but the new mesalazine gel enema may be
better still.25
There is no evidence that elemental diets or other dietary intervention
have any specific therapeutic effect in ulcerative colitis. However,
the support of a dietician in the management of patients is invaluable
for monitoring daily nutritional intake and educating patients on the
principles of good nutrition. Many patients are iron deficient and may
require supplementation with oral iron preparations. Parenteral iron or
recombinant human erythropoietin26 has been used in cases
where oral supplements are poorly tolerated.
Maintenance of remission
Since attacks recur, maintenance treatment is important.
Sulphasalazine and the 5-aminosalicylic acid preparations are equally
effective,27 but the 5-aminosalicylic acid preparations are better tolerated. Intolerance to 5-aminosalicylic acid drugs occurs
in about 10% of patients.28 All 5-aminosalicylic acid preparations are potentially nephrotoxic and so regular monitoring of
renal function is mandatory.29 In patients with steroid
resistant or dependent disease, immunosuppressive drugs such as
azathioprine may maintain remission. Though the evidence supporting the
use of azathioprine in ulcerative colitis is weaker than that in
Crohn's disease, a recent survey confirmed its widespread use by
British gastroenterologists.30
Medical treatment of severe disease
Corticosteroids are the mainstay of treatment. These may be given
orally or intravenously, usually in a daily dose of 60-80 mg
methylprednisolone intravenously, or 40-60 mg prednisolone orally. The
dose and form of corticosteroids used are not fully backed up by dose
ranging trials in severe disease. Where corticosteroids are ineffective
several alternative treatments have been tried. Noticeable clinical
improvement has been reported in patients treated with intravenous
unfractionated heparin.
31 32
Cyclosporin, given
intravenously (4 mg/kg)33 or orally (4-9 mg/kg) has proved
successful in inducing remission
for example, in a paediatric series
11 of 14 children responded.34 Even lower doses may be
effective, with fewer side effects. In many instances, however,
colectomy is only delayed and not prevented
seven of these cases
needed colectomy within a year. The trend currently is to induce
remission with cyclosporin and to maintain this with an
immunosuppressive drug such as azathioprine. Over half of patients on
this regimen may avoid colectomy in the longer term.35
Avoiding colectomy, even for a short period, can be beneficial to some patients by providing time to think about surgery or allowing an
elective rather than an emergency procedure. We believe that cyclosporin has a place in managing severe ulcerative colitis, a view
supported by recent quality of life data.36 Such treatment should, however, be confined to specialist centres.
The excellent results of, effectively curative, surgical treatment must
always be taken into account when deciding whether to prolong medical treatment.
 |
Failure of medical management and indications for surgery |
Proctocolectomy or colectomy with rectal preservation may be an
emergency procedure in fulminant colitis or toxic megacolon. More
often, however, the procedure is elective after failure of medical
treatment either through a lack of efficacy or unacceptable side
effects (see fig D on website). Rarely, in a patient with long standing
colitis, colectomy is necessary because of the development of severe
dysplasia or carcinoma of the colonic epithelium. Until recently,
surgical treatment implied permanent ileostomy, a prospect unacceptable
to many patients. Now, advances in surgical technique have allowed the
creation of an ileal reservoir or pouch, and with ileoanal anastomosis
the need for permanent ileostomy is diminishing. Restorative surgery of
this nature should be considered in every patient. Because of a
child's small pelvis it may be technically advisable to delay pouch
surgery until the mid teens, but often the best functional results
after pouch surgery are seen in children.37 Continent
ileostomy has little use but may be considered in patients with
existing conventional ileostomy or in pouch failures.
 |
Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and pouchitis |
Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir has
revolutionised surgery for ulcerative colitis, and with increasing
confidence the indications have been widened to include those with more
limited but refractory disease.38 Pouchitis, a
non-specific inflammation of the ileal reservoir, is the most frequent
long term complication after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for
ulcerative colitis. This poorly understood condition may occur in up to
one third of patients within 5 years of surgery, with two thirds of
these having recurrent episodes.39-41 Though faecal stasis
is a popular explanation of the cause of pouchitis, no difference in
the faecal concentrations of bacteria, bile acids, and short chain
fatty acids has been reported between patients with or without
pouchitis. Complex interactions between an immunologically susceptible
mucosa, faecal stasis, and bacterial flora merit further investigation.
Metronidazole is an effective first line treatment. In pregnant
patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, delivery by caesarean
section should be considered as sphincter damage may be detrimental to
pouch function. Though fertility is not reduced in ulcerative colitis in itself, postoperative fertility may be reduced after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in women of childbearing age.42
 |
Malignancy complicating ulcerative
colitis |
Disease duration of more than eight years and disease extent
proximal to the sigmoid colon are the two major determinants of
increased risk of colorectal cancer in ulcerative colitis (box 3).
Coexistent primary sclerosing cholangitis also increases the risk.43 Screening for dysplasia by colonoscopy at regular
intervals (1-2 years) remains the only feasible method for surveillance (fig 3). End points such as surgery must be understood by the patient
before entering a surveillance programme. The limitations of
colonoscopy as well as alternative options (colectomy after 10 years of
extensive disease) need to be discussed in detail. Detection of
dysplasia is an imperfect science and other reliable markers of a
premalignant stage are needed. p53 mutations,44 Ki-ras,45 Ki-67, and sialosyl-Tn are among some of the
candidates being evaluated.
|
Box 3
: Risk factors for malignancy in ulcerative colitis
- Longstanding disease of more than 8 years
- Family history of colon cancer
- Expression of sialosyl-Tn antigen in mucosal biopsies
- ? Onset in childhood and adolescence
|
|

View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig 3.
Highly dysplastic mass lesion in caecum of
patient with ulcerative colitis of 12 years' duration
|
|
 |
Sclerosing cholangitis in ulcerative colitis |
Primary sclerosing cholangitis is the commonest form of chronic
liver disease associated with ulcerative colitis and may be present in
2-7% of patients depending on how diligently it
is sought.46 Primary sclerosing cholangitis associated
with ulcerative colitis is twofold more common in men than women. The ulcerative colitis affects the entire colon in 90% of patients but
symptoms are often mild. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography is the
best method of confirming the diagnosis, but magnetic resonance cholangiography is likely to become the non-invasive diagnostic method
of choice. Perinuclear antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies may be
detectable in serum.47 Medical treatment with agents such
as corticosteroids, colchicine, penicillamine, and ursodeoxycholic acid
has not been shown to retard progression of liver
disease.48 Endoscopic treatment may be beneficial in
selected patients with dominant extrahepatic biliary
strictures.49 Progressive cholestatic jaundice with liver
failure and development of cholangiocarcinoma are the two fatal
consequences of primary sclerosing cholangitis. Orthotopic liver
transplantation is the only treatment available to patients with
advanced liver disease.50 It is important to continue
surveillance colonoscopy after liver transplantation to detect colonic
dysplasia.51
 |
Conclusion |
The diagnosis and management of ulcerative colitis remain a
challenge to clinicians. Rigorous epidemiological study of the negative
relations between ulcerative colitis, smoking habit, and appendicectomy
may yield further clues to the cause of this condition. Most patients
can be managed wholly as outpatients. Symptomatic relapses are the
rule, however, and so maintenance treatment with oral 5-aminosalicylic
acid preparations is important to keep these to a minimum. Most have
distal disease that is amenable to topical application of
5-aminosalicylic acid or corticosteroid preparations, and many
patients will begin self treatment with these at the first signs of a
flare up. The overall prognosis in ulcerative colitis is good, and with
the exception of the first year of diagnosis when the risk of colectomy
is statistically highest there is no significant excess in mortality.
 |
Footnotes |
Additional details appear on the
BMJ's website
 |
References |
| 1.
|
Probert CS, Jayanthi V, Pinder D, Wicks AC, Mayberry JF.
Epidemiological study of ulcerative proctocolitis in Indian migrants and the indigenous population of Leicestershire.
Gut
1992;
33:
687-693[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Hendriksen C, Kreiner S, Binder V.
Long term prognosis in ulcerative colitis based on results from a regional group from the county of Copenhagen.
Gut
1985;
26:
158-163[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Allan RN, Rhodes JM, Hanauer SB, Keighley MRB, Alexander-Williams J, Fazio VW.
Inflammatory bowel disease
3rd ed.
Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1997.
|
| 4.
|
Targan SR, Shanahan F.
Inflammatory bowel disease: from bench to bedside.
Maryland: Williams and Wilkins, 1994.
|
| 5.
|
Korelitz BI, Sohn N.
Management of inflammatory bowel disease.
St Louis, MI: Mosby Year Book, 1992.
|
| 6.
|
British Society of Gastroenterology.
Guidelines in gastroenterology 4. Inflammatory bowel disease.
BSG, 1996.
|
| 7.
|
Kornbluth A, Sachar DB.
Ulcerative colitis practice guidelines in adults.
Am J Gastroenterol
1997;
92:
204-211[Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Machida HM, Catto Smith AG, Gall DG, Trevenen C, Scott RB.
Allergic colitis in infancy: clinical and pathologic aspects.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr
1994;
19:
22-26[Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Pullan RD, Thomas GA, Rhodes M, Newcombe RG, Williams GT, Allen A, et al.
Thickness of adherent mucus gel on colonic mucosa in humans and its relevance to colitis.
Gut
1994;
35:
353-359[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Tysk C, Riedesel H, Lindberg E, Panzini B, Podolsky D.
Colonic glycoproteins in monozygotic twins with inflammatory bowel disease.
Gastroenterology
1991;
100:
419-423[Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Tsai HH, Dwarakanath AD, Hart CA.
Increased faecal mucin sulphatase activity in ulcerative colitis: a potential target for treatment.
Gut
1995;
36:
570-576[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Rutgeerts P, D'Hans G, Hiele M, Geboes K, Vantrappen G.
Appendectomy protects against ulcerative colitis.
Gastroenterology
1994;
106:
1251-1253[Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Dijkstra B, Bagshaw PF, Frizelle FA.
Appendectomy protects against ulcerative colitis even when controlling for cigarette smoking.
Dis Colon Rectum
1999;
42:
334-336[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Pitcher MCL, Cummings JH.
Hydrogen sulphide a bacterial toxin in ulcerative colitis.
Gut
1996;
39:
1-4[Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Das KM, Dasgupta A, Mandal A, Geng X.
Autoimmunity to cytoskeletal protein tropomyosin. A clue to the pathogenetic mechanisms for ulcerative colitis.
J Immunol
1993;
150:
2487-2493[Abstract].
|
| 16.
|
Cantrell M, Prindiville T, Gershwin ME.
Autoantibodies to colonic cells and subcellular fractions in inflammatory bowel disease: do they exist?
J Autoimmun
1990;
3:
307-320[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Mosman TR, Sad S.
The expanding universe of T-cell subsets Th1, Th2 and more.
Immunol Today
1996;
17:
38-46.
|
| 18.
|
Truelove SC, Witts LJ.
Cortisone in ulcerative colitis. Final reports on a controlled trial.
BMJ
1955;
ii:
1041-1048.
|
| 19.
|
Powell-Tuck J, Bown RL, Lennard-Jones JE.
A comparison of oral prednisolone given as a single or multiple daily doses for active proctocolitis.
Scand J Gastroenterol
1978;
13:
833-837[Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Best WR, Becktel JM, Singleton JW, Kern F.
Development of a Crohn's disease activity index: national cooperative Crohn's disease study.
Gastroenterology
1976;
70:
439-444[Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Acciuffi S, Ghosh S, Ferguson A.
Strengths and limitations of the Crohn's disease activity index, revealed by an objective gut lavage test of gastro-intestinal protein loss.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther
1996;
10:
321-326[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Hanauer SB.
Balsalazide led to greater remission rates and tolerance than mesalamine in acute ulcerative colitis.
Gut
1999;
44:
455[Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Marshall JK, Irvine EJ.
Rectal corticosteroids versus alternative treatments in ulcerative colitis: a meta-analysis.
Gut
1997;
40:
775-781[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Somerville KW, Langman MJ, Kane SP, MacGilchrist AJ, Watkinson G, Salmon P.
Effect of treatment on symptoms and quality of life in patients with ulcerative colitis: comparative trial of hydrocortisone acetate foam and prednisolone 21 phosphate enemas.
BMJ
1985;
291:
866.
|
| 25.
|
Gionchetti P, Ardizzone S, Benvenuti ME, Bianchi Porro G, Biasco G, Cesari P, et al.
A new mesalazine gel enema in the treatment of left-sided ulcerative colitis: a randomised controlled multicentre trial.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther
1999;
13:
381-388[Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Schreiber S, Howaldt S, Schnoor M, Nikolaus S, Bauditz J, Gasche C, et al.
Recombinant erythropoietin for the treatment of anaemia in inflammatory bowel disease.
N Engl J Med
1996;
334:
619-623[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
|
Nilsson A, Danielsson A, Lofberg R, Benno P, Bergman L, Fausa O, et al.
Olsalazine versus sulphasalazine for relapse prevention in ulcerative colitis: a multicenter study.
Am J Gastroenterol
1995;
90:
381-387[Medline].
|
| 28.
|
Courtney MG, Nunes DP, Bergin CF, O'Driscoll M, Trimble V, Keeling PW, et al.
Randomised comparison of olsalazine and mesalazine in prevention of relapses in ulcerative colitis [see comments].
Lancet
1992;
339:
1279-1281[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Thuluvath PJ, Ninkovic M, Calam J, Anderson M.
Mesalazine induced interstitial nephritis.
Gut
1994;
35:
1493-1496[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Stack WA, Williams D, Stevenson M, Logan RF.
Immunosuppressive therapy for ulcerative colitis: results of a nationwide survey among consultant physician members of the British Society of Gastroenterologists.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther
1999;
13:
569-575[Medline].
|
| 31.
|
Evans RC, Shim-Wong V, Morris AI, Rhodes JM.
Treatment of corticosteroid resistant ulcerative colitis with heparin a report of 16 cases.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther
1997;
11:
1037-1040[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 32.
|
Gaffney PR, Doyle CT, Gaffney A, Hogan J, Hayes DP, Annis P.
Paradoxical response to heparin in 10 patients with ulcerative colitis.
Am J Gastroenterol
1995;
90:
220-223[Medline].
|
| 33.
|
Lichtiger S, Present DH, Kornbluth A, Gelernt I, Bauer J, Galler G, et al.
Cyclosporine in severe ulcerative colitis refractory to steroid therapy.
N Engl J Med
1994;
330:
1841-1845[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 34.
|
Treem WR, Davis PM, Justinich CJ, Hyams JS.
Cyclosporine for the treatment of fulminant ulcerative colitis in children: immediate response, long-term results, and impact on surgery.
Dis Colon Rectum
1995;
38:
474-479[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 35.
|
Stack WA, Long RG, Hawkey CJ.
Short- and long-term outcome of patients treated with cyclosporin for severe acute ulcerative colitis.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther
1998;
12:
973-978[Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Cohen RD, Brodsky AL, Hanauer SB.
A comparison of the quality of life in patients with severe ulcerative colitis after total colectomy versus medical treatment with intravenous cyclosporin.
Inflamm Bowel Dis
1999;
5:
1-10[Medline].
|
| 37.
|
Kelly KA.
Anal sphincter saving operations for chronic ulcerative colitis.
Am J Surg
1992;
163:
5-11[Medline].
|
| 38.
|
Seidel SA, Peach SE, Newman M, Sharp KW.
Ileoanal pouch procedures: clinical outcomes and quality of life assessment.
Am Surg
1999;
65:
40-46[Medline].
|
| 39.
|
Luukkonen P, Jarvinen H, Tanskanen M, Kahri A.
Pouchitis recurrence of the inflammatory bowel disease?
Gut
1994;
35:
243-246[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 40.
|
Mignon M, Settler C, Phillips SF.
Pouchitis a poorly understood entity.
Dis Colon Rectum
1995;
38:
100-103[Medline].
|
| 41.
|
Stahlberg D, Gullberg K, Liljeqvist L, Hellers G, Lofberg R.
Pouchitis following pelvic pouch operation for ulcerative colitis. Incidence, cumulative risk and risk factors.
Dis Colon Rectum
1996;
39:
1012-1018[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 42.
|
Olsen KA, Joelsson M, Laurberg S, Oresland T.
Fertility after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in women with ulcerative colitis.
Br J Surg
1999;
86:
493-495[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 43.
|
Brentnall TA, Haggitt RC, Rabinovitch PS, Kimmey MB, Bronner MP, Levine DS, et al.
Risk and natural history of colonic neoplasia in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis and ulcerative colitis.
Gastroenterology
1996;
110:
331-338[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 44.
|
Lashner BA, Shapiro BD, Husain A, Goldblum JR.
Evaluation of the usefulness of testing for p53 mutations in colorectal cancer surveillance for ulcerative colitis.
Am J Gastroenterol
1999;
94:
456-462[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 45.
|
Holzmann K, Klump B, Borchard F, Hsieh CJ, Kuhn A, Gaco V, et al.
Comparative analysis of histology, DNA content, p53 and Ki-ras mutations in colectomy specimens with long-standing ulcerative colitis.
Int J Cancer
1998;
76:
1-6[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 46.
|
Olsson R, Danielsson A, Jarnerot G, Lindstrom E, Loof L, Rolny P, et al.
Prevalence of primary sclerosing cholangitis in patients with ulcerative colitis.
Gastroenterology
1991;
100:
1319-1323[Medline].
|
| 47.
|
Roozendaal C, Van Milligen de Wit AW, Haagsma EB, Horst G, Schwarze C, Peter HH, et al.
Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies in primary sclerosing cholangitis: defined specificities may be associated with distinct clinical features.
Am J Gastroenterol
1998;
105:
393-399.
|
| 48.
|
Mitchell SA, Chapman RWG.
Review article: the management of primary sclerosing cholangitis.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther
1997;
11:
33-43[Medline].
|
| 49.
|
Lee JG, Schutz SM, England RE, Leung JW, Cotton PB.
Endoscopic therapy of sclerosing cholangitis.
Hepatology
1995;
21:
661-667[Medline].
|
| 50.
|
Narvin S, Roberts JP, Emond JC, Lake J, Ascher NL.
Liver transplantation for sclerosing cholangitis.
Hepatology
1995;
22:
451-457[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 51.
|
Loftus Jr EV, Aguilar HI, Sandborn WJ, Tremaine WJ, Krom RA.
ZinsmeisterAR, et al. Risk of colorectal neoplasia in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis and ulcerative colitis following orthotopic liver transplantation.
Hepatology
1998;
27:
685-690[CrossRef][Medline].
|
© BMJ 2000