Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
John L Reed H M Inspectorate of
Prisons, Home Office, London SW1H 9AT
Correspondence to: J L Reed drjohnreed{at}excite.co.uk
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Objective:
To investigate the facilities for inpatient care of mentally disordered people in prison.
A survey by the Office for National Statistics in 1998 showed a
high prevalence of mental disorder among prisoners.1
Compared with 0.4% of the general household population,2
7% of sentenced men, 10% of men on remand, and 14% of female
prisoners had evidence of psychosis in the year preceding interview;
most of these prisoners had schizophrenia or other delusional disorder.
Sixty four per cent of women on remand reported symptoms of depression
compared with 11% in the general population. These rates are
considerably higher than those reported by the prison service, whose
unstructured "snapshot surveys" found that 5% of prisoners in 1995 and 3.8% in 1996 had "some degree of mental disorder requiring
intervention."3 The rates are also higher than those
found in previous research studies.4-6
The NHS is not responsible for most health care in prisons, although
since 1991 the Prison Service in England and Wales has aimed to provide
health care of the same standard as the NHS.7 Health care
in prisons is provided mainly by staff employed by the prison service,
although some prisons contract services from the NHS or independent
healthcare providers. Not all nursing staff are registered nurses; a
proportion are non-nursing qualified healthcare officers who have
received six months healthcare training as well as prison officer
training. The prison governor, who has rarely had any healthcare
training, is responsible for setting the budget for health care and for
contracting and monitoring services. The main NHS responsibility until
recently has been for secondary care of prisoners either through
consultants visiting prisons or by transfer to NHS inpatient care.
Prison healthcare centres, although commonly called hospitals, are not
like NHS hospitals but more like sickbays with primary care cover. Not
all prisons have beds in their healthcare centres, although all have
access to beds by transferring patients to another prison if necessary.
Inpatients have diverse clinical problems, ranging from those awaiting
transfer to high security NHS hospitals to others with minor physical
illness. About 75% of patients admitted to healthcare centre beds have
mental health problems.3 The provisions of the Mental
Health Act 1983 do not apply to inpatient care in prisons, and
treatment without consent is possible only in emergencies under common law.
The standard of health care in prisons has caused concern for many
years.8 The health advisory committee to the prison service found that national policies for mental illness did not apply
in prisons, that commissioning and management standards were lower than
in the NHS, that patients in prison did not have access to a full range
of services, and that there were few multidisciplinary teams.9 The committee did not, however, inspect services
in individual prisons. In 1997, we reported on health care in 19 prisons in England and Wales based on a year's programme of
semistructured inspections.10 We found wide variations in
the quality of health care. A few prisons provided care broadly
equivalent to that in the NHS but in many the health care was of low
quality, some doctors were not adequately trained, and some care failed
to meet proper ethical standards. The present study reports on
inpatient mental health care in healthcare centres based on the
inspection of 13 prisons in England and Wales between September 1997 and August 1998.
Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Prisons
The inspectorate has a set of expectations of the level and
quality of service and care in prisons. The expectations for health care are based on the prison service standing order 13,11
the nine healthcare standards approved by the Prisons' Board during 1994-6 for implementation by mid-1997,12 and standards
current in the NHS. The healthcare standards cover health assessment at first reception, mental health services, primary and outpatient care,
inpatient care, reception, transfer and discharge, health promotion,
clinical services for HIV and AIDS, clinical services for substance
misusers, and the use of medicines.
The 13 prisons were visited as part of the inspectorate's routine
programme and were not selected because of special concerns about
health care. Healthcare inspections lasted two to four days and were
conducted by a medical inspector, a nursing inspector, a professional
standards inspector from the Royal Pharmaceutical Society (since 1997)
and a dentist from the Dental Practice Board (since 1998). The results
of inspection of pharmacy services have been given
elsewhere.13 Inspectors visit all healthcare areas, hold
discussions with staff (both those employed by the prison and visiting
specialists), review the annual reports on health care in the prison
and local guidelines and protocols, and meet patients individually and,
when appropriate, in a group. The views of inmates in the prison as a
whole are sought about a range of aspects of prison life through
confidential questionnaires and group discussions.
The 13 prisons comprised eight local prisons (dealing with remand
prisoners and those early in their sentences), three high security
dispersal prisons, one category B training prison, and one young
offenders' institution. Most prisons are multifunctional, and several
of the local prisons also performed other functions including acting as
training prisons and young offenders' institutions.
Management
Size and structure of inpatient areas
Design:
Semistructured inspections conducted by doctor and nurse. Expected standards were based on healthcare quality standards published by the Prison Service or the NHS.
Setting:
13 prisons with inpatient beds in England and
Wales subject to the prison inspectorate's routine inspection programme during 1997-8.
Main outcomes measures:
Appraisals of quality of care
against published standards.
Results:
The 13 prisons had 348 beds, 20% of all beds in prisons. Inpatient units had between 3 and 75 beds. No doctor in
charge of inpatients had completed specialist psychiatric training. 24% of nursing staff had mental health training; 32% were non-nursing trained healthcare officers. Only one prison had occupational therapy
input; two had input from a clinical psychologist. Most patients were
unlocked for about 3.5 hours a day and none for more than nine hours a
day. Four prisons provided statistics on the use of seclusion. The
average length of an episode of seclusion was 50 hours.
Conclusion:
The quality of services for mentally ill
prisoners fell far below the standards in the NHS. Patients' lives
were unacceptably restricted and therapy limited. The present policy dividing inpatient care of mentally disordered prisoners between the
prison service and the NHS needs reconsideration.
![]()
Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
Prisons have been subject to inspection since 1791, with a truly
independent inspectorate being established in 1979. The purpose of the
inspectorate is "To contribute to the reduction in crime by
inspecting the treatment and conditions of those in prison service
custody and in Immigration Service detention." Its reports are public
documents available from the inspectorate or on the internet
(www.homeoffice.gov.uk). The inspectorate aims to visit every
prison once in five years, and its work comprises a programme of
announced inspections lasting a week or longer, shorter unannounced
inspections, and thematic reports on various issues.
![]()
Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
Day to day management of prisons' healthcare services was
generally the responsibility of a member of nursing or healthcare
officer staff with the managing medical officer providing oversight and
strategic direction. Nine of the thirteen services inspected were
managed by non-nurse qualified healthcare officers and one (with 16 beds) was managed by a discipline prison officer with no healthcare training.
The 13 healthcare centres had a total of 348 beds, 20% of the
total of beds reported as available throughout the prison
service.14 The table shows the size of the inpatient units.
Staffing
Medical
The healthcare standards require that clinical responsibility for services for mentally disordered inpatients rests with a "doctor who is psychiatrically qualified." The
inspectorate takes this to mean a doctor whose name is on the relevant
specialist register. No doctor in charge of inpatients in the prisons
inspected met this standard, although some had received some specialist psychiatric training. A survey found that 21 of the 190 doctors employed by the prison service were members of the Royal College of
Psychiatrists or held a diploma in psychological
medicine.15
Healthcare standard 2 says that "staff will have
received training in mental health care" and "a proportion [of
staff] will be nurses with a mental health qualification." Most
nursing staff in the prisons had no mental health training. Non-nurse trained healthcare officers accounted for 32% of staff, 44% were general nurses, and only 24% were mental health or dually trained nurses.
The standard also requires that the care regime is multidisciplinary,
including healthcare staff, other prison staff (psychologists, probation officers, chaplains, and teachers), visiting specialists, and
voluntary agencies. Only one prison held regular multidisciplinary team
meetings, and care was usually described as "bidisciplinary," involving nurses and doctors. Only two prisons had established clinical
psychology sessions and one also had two sessions from an occupational
therapist. Three inpatient units had regular input from local community
psychiatric nurses.
Night staffing
No standards have been set for night staffing, and patients'
access to nursing staff during the night was poor. Most prisons had
only one nurse or healthcare officer on duty at night, usually assisted
by a support grade officer with no healthcare training. For security,
nurses on night duty usually could not carry room keys. The keys and
extra staff had to be brought from the main prison before a patient
could be unlocked. It took at least 10 minutes before a nurse could
gain access to a patient. Staff often spoke of their concern that this
delay might be critical. The night nurse also had to attend the main wings if an inmate required health care. Such incidents left inpatients without trained staff for up to an hour.
Patients' day
The healthcare standards require that patients whose clinical
state permits it spend 12 hours a day unlocked and out of their rooms.
Patients should take part in at least six hours of planned activity
daily. The inspectorate expects that this will be therapeutic activity
including education and the development of interpersonal and daily
living skills such as would be found in an NHS inpatient psychiatric
unit. No prison met these standards. The actual time unlocked was hard
to quantify since it varied day by day depending on staff availability.
The healthcare centre which was nearest to meeting the standard had patients unlocked for about nine hours a day with group work or education sessions four afternoons a week. Most prisons had patients unlocked for around 3.5 hours a day. In all prisons patients were locked in their rooms or wards for 12 hours or more each night. The
longest period of night time lock up we recorded was from 4 30 pm to
9 30 am and the shortest 7 00 pm to 7 00 am.
Use of seclusion
Only four inpatient units had returned the statistics required
about their use of unfurnished and protected rooms in the month before
our visit. These four units had secluded 36 patients on 43 occasions
for a total of 2168 hours, an episode of seclusion lasting on average
50 hours, and on average a patient who needed seclusion had been
restricted for 60 hours in the month examined. These times were longer
than those reported nationally by the prison service for 1996-7, when
an episode of seclusion averaged 20 hours and time in seclusion per
patient averaged 24.7 hours.13 We were told that high
levels of seclusion were unavoidable because staffing levels made more
humane management of acutely disturbed patients impossible. Seclusion
often took place overnight or during weekends, when the staffing
problems were greatest.
Referral and transfer to NHS
All prisons had arrangements for psychiatrists to visit and assess
patients either for suitability for transfer to the NHS or to advise on
treatment in prison, and these arrangements worked well. In contrast to
our previous findings,10 many prisoners meeting the
criteria for transfer to the NHS experienced long waits in prison until
a bed became available. One prison had 10 patients waiting assessment
or transfer. The four accepted for transfer to the NHS had waited
between 4 and 20 months with an average of just under 11 months.
Although the numbers awaiting transfer from this prison were high,
lengthy waits were usual in the prisons we visited and have been
reported elsewhere.17
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A period in prison should present an opportunity to detect, diagnose, and treat mental illness in a population often hard to engage with NHS services. This could bring major benefits not only to patients but to the wider community by ensuring continuity of care and reducing the risk of reoffending on release.
Most staff whom we met were caring professionals who were trying under difficult circumstances to do their best to help their patients. Mentally ill patients in prison healthcare centres are often described as being similar to those in NHS medium secure units. There are no comparative studies to support this, but the Office for National Statistics study suggests that there are around 5000 people with psychosis detained in prison at any one time and prison inpatient units hold many mentally disordered patients clinically similar to those in NHS secure psychiatric units.1 Yet the management, staffing, and clinical facilities of prison inpatient units is much worse than in the NHS. Patients had restricted days with little constructive to do. Most nursing staff had no mental health training, and no doctor in charge of inpatients had completed specialist psychiatric training. Only one prison had a full multidisciplinary team.
Despite the requirement to implement the healthcare standards by mid-1997,9 we found little evidence that the prison service had attempted to ensure that the standards were met. The Chief Inspector of Prisons has been critical of the lack of central direction of prison health care, describing a "ridiculous" situation in which the prison services' director of health care is "responsible for the policy of equivalence with the National Health Service but not, apparently, for ensuring that equivalence is delivered."18 The government has recently renewed its commitment to improving the health care of prisoners.19 A new policy unit based in the NHS Executive will replace the existing Health Care Directorate, which is based in Prison Service headquarters, and a task force will work with prisons and the NHS to lead and support change locally. This new initiative should deal with many of the issues we have raised, notably the need for greater expertise in assessing need and in commissioning health care.
|
What is already known on this topic
The level of psychiatric morbidity among prisoners is known to be much higher than in the general population. About 75% of inpatients in prison healthcare centres have mental health problems What this study addsSemistructured inspection of 13 prisons with inpatient beds showed that facilities were often poor, staff numbers were low, and many staff were not sufficiently trained Patients' spent too much time locked up and had insufficient therapeutic activity Providing two inpatient services for mentally ill offenders, one in prison and one in the NHS, may not be the best way to provide proper patient care and help ensure public safety |
Future strategy
An early objective for the policy unit and task force should be
improving the care of mentally disordered prisoners, particularly those
who require inpatient care. If the present policy of transferring to
the NHS only patients detainable under the Mental Health Act and
retaining others in prison even if they need 24 hour nursing care is
continued, it will be necessary, at a minimum, to ensure that inpatient
care in prisons is given by doctors and nurses with appropriate
training, that the relevant healthcare standards are met, and that
patients meeting the criteria for transfer to the NHS are transferred
promptly. Achieving this would require a major programme of upgrading
healthcare centres, and establishing two inpatient services, one in
prisons and one in the NHS, would be staff intensive and risk
duplication of services.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank the governors, staff, and inmates of the prisons inspected for their openness and cooperation.
Contributors: JLR had the original idea for the study, designed the study, collected data, analysed the data and wrote the first draft of the paper. ML assisted in designing the study, collected data, and commented on and approved later drafts of the paper. JLR is the guarantor.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Funding: H M Inspectorate of Prisons.
Competing interests: None declared.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Singleton N, Meltzer H, Gatward R. Psychiatric morbidity among prisoners in England and Wales. London: Stationery Office, 1998. |
| 2. | Meltzer H, Gill B, Pettigrew M. The prevalence of psychiatric morbidity among adults aged 16-64, living in private households, in Great Britain. London: Office for Population, Censuses and Surveys, 1994. |
| 3. | Prison Service. Report of the director of health care 1995-1996. London: Stationery Office, 1997. |
| 4. | Gunn J, Maden A, Swinton J. Treatment needs of prisoners with psychiatric disorders. BMJ 1991; 303: 338-341. |
| 5. |
Birmingham L, Mason D, Grubin D.
Prevalence of mental disorder in remand prisoners: consecutive case study.
BMJ
1996;
313:
1521-1524 |
| 6. |
Brooke D, Taylor C, Gunn J, Maden A.
Point prevalence of mental disorder in unconvicted male prisoners in England and Wales.
BMJ
1996;
313:
1524-1527 |
| 7. | Home Office. Custody, care and justice: the way ahead for the prison service in England and Wales. London: HMSO, 1991. |
| 8. | Smith R. Prison health care. London: British Medical Association, 1984. |
| 9. | Health Advisory Committee for the Prison Service. The provision of mental health care in prisons. London: Prison Service, 1997. |
| 10. |
Reed J, Lyne M.
The quality of health care in prison: results of a year's programme of semistructured inspections.
BMJ
1997;
315:
1420-1424 |
| 11. | Her Majesty's Prison Service. Standing order 13: health care. London: Prison Service, 1991-4. |
| 12. | Her Majesty's Prison Service, Directorate of Health Care. Health care standards for prisons in England and Wales. London: Prison Service, 1993-6. |
| 13. | Williams J. Inspection of pharmaceutical services in prisons. Pharmaceutical Journal 1999; 263: 634-635. |
| 14. | Prison Service. Report of the director of health care 1996-1997. London: Stationery Office, 1998. |
| 15. | Thomlinson L. Rehabilitating prison health. BMA News Review 1998 October. |
| 16. | Department of Health. In-patients formally detained in hospitals under the Mental Health Act 1983 and other legislation, England: 1991-92 to 1996-97. London: Department of Health, 1998. |
| 17. | Hargreaves D. The transfer of severely mentally ill prisoners from HMP Wakefield: a descriptive study. J Foren Psych 1997; 8: 62-73. |
| 18. | Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Prisons. Report of a full inspection of HMYOI and RC Reading. London: Home Office, 1999. |
| 19. | Her Majesty's Prison Service and NHS Executive. The future organisation of prison health care. London: Department of Health, 1999. |
(Accepted 20 January 2000)
Read all Rapid Responses