Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
EDITOR In the United Kingdom most postmortem examinations on adults are
performed because they are directed by law. The main reason is to
ascertain a natural medical cause of death for certification, thereby
removing the need for an inquest. In the past, retaining the brain for
examination was a routine part of the practice of pathologists, but it
is now clear that many relatives of the deceased person may not have
been aware of this. Because of concerns over the legitimacy of organ
retention the true cause of a degenerative brain disease is now hardly
ever being established after a postmortem examination, even though the
brain has been examined by the inadequate method of slicing during the
necropsy. Simply certifying that a person has died of a disease such as
pneumonia, in the face of a decline as a result of a degenerative brain
disease, is giving a mechanism of death rather than its true cause.
This has implications for estimating misclassification rates in
epidemiological studies.3 I suspect that many families
will be concerned that they were not given the opportunity to benefit
from appropriate investigations. Guidelines from the Royal College of
Pathologists (www.rcpath.org) will be released soon, but medical and
public confidence has already been lost.
So far, the cases of new variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease have been in
a distinct subset of the population.1 We have no knowledge
of the ways in which new variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease may become
manifest, especially in elderly people. Unless a positive statement is
made to reassure the public, medicolegal authorities, and
pathologists, the situation of "not looking" will prevail and we
run the risk of missing any emerging epidemic.
The United Kingdom faces the possibility of an epidemic of
new variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease as a result of bovine spongiform
encephalopathy,1 but the referral of brain tissue to
neuropathologists to determine the cause of degenerative diseases of
the brain has virtually stopped. Public concerns over the retention of
tissues for investigation after postmortem examination make it is easy
to see how this has happened.2
School of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, Division of Pathology,
University of Nottingham Medical School, Nottingham NG7 2UH
james.lowe{at}nottingham.ac.uk
Competing interests: Professor Lowe recieves funding from the UK Department of Health for surveillance of the incidence of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. He is a member of the council of the Royal College of Pathologists and has contributed to the formulation of its document Guidelines for the Retention of Tissues at Post-mortem Examination.
| 1. | Collinge J. Variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Lancet 1999; 354: 317-323[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 2. |
Woodman R.
Storage of human organs prompts three inquiries.
BMJ
2000;
320:
77 |
| 3. |
Majeed A, Lehmann P, Kirby L, Knight R, Coleman M.
Extent of misclassification of death from Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in England 1979-96: retrospective examination of clinical records.
BMJ
2000;
320:
145-147 |
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+