Lower error rates in reading radiographs can be sustained by redesigning the system

As part of a quality improvement exercise to reduce the rate of misintepreted radiographs in an emergency department, Espinosa and Nolan discovered that four separate processes for reading radiographs were in operation, involving both emergency physicians and radiologists (p 737). After new training was introduced and all misinterpreted radiographs were routinely reviewed, the error rate fell from 3% to 1.2%. The process of reading radiographs was then simplified, so that emergency physicians read all radiographs, all were reviewed within 12 hours by a radiologist, and patients were called back if any misinterpretations were found. This resulted in a further fall in the error rate to 0.3%, which was sustained over three years. Reliability modelling also confirmed that the redesigned system should result in lower error rates than the original system.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Reducing errors made by emergency physicians in interpreting radiographs: longitudinal study
James A Espinosa and Thomas W Nolan
BMJ 2000 320: 737-740. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ