BMJ 2000;320:569-572 ( 26 February )

Education and debate

The role of patient care teams in chronic disease management

Edward H Wagner, director. 

W A MacColl Institute for Healthcare Innovation, Center for Health Studies, Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound, 1730 Minor Ave, Suite 1290, Seattle WA 98101, USA

wagner.e{at}ghc.org

"In the gradual division of labor, by which civilization has emerged from barbarism, the doctor and nurse have been evolved"

Sir William Osler (1891)

The delivery of health care by a coordinated team of individuals has always been assumed to be a good thing. Patients reap the benefits of more eyes and ears, the insights of different bodies of knowledge, and a wider range of skills. Thus team care has generally been embraced by most as a criterion for high quality care. Despite its appeal, team care, especially in the primary care setting, remains a source of confusion and some scepticism.1 Which disciplines are essential on the team? What do the team members other than the doctor do to support patient care?

With the ageing of the population and the advances in the treatment of chronic diseases, teamwork in the context of chronic diseases needs to be re-examined. Successful chronic disease interventions usually involve a coordinated multidisciplinary care team.2-5

In this article I consider the implications of these observations for the structure and functioning of patient care teams in primary care. My work is rooted in US health care, and the references and roles described largely reflect that perspective. I performed a Medline search for randomised controlled trials of team care using the MeSH heading "patient care team."


Summary points

Effective chronic illness interventions generally rely on multidisciplinary care teams
Successful teams often include nurses and pharmacists with clinical and behavioural skills
Such teams ensure that critical elements of care that doctors may not have the training or time to do well are competently performed
These elements include population management, protocol based regulation of medication, self management support, and intensive follow up
The participation of medical specialists in consultative and educational roles outside conventional referrals may contribute to better outcomes



    What is a patient care team?

A patient care team is a group of diverse clinicians who communicate with each other regularly about the care of a defined group of patients and participate in that care.6 Do the typical staff members in a surgery---nurse, medical assistant, and receptionist---constitute a care team? The answer depends on how they function as a group---whether they meet, whether they explicitly define clinical roles, and what kinds of clinical roles they have. Starfield identified three categories of functions performed by non-medical staff: supplementary functions (functions that could be done, albeit inefficiently, by the doctor---such as giving injections); complementary functions (those that doctors often have neither the skills nor the time to do well, such as counselling on behavioural change); and substitute functions (those that are traditionally performed by the doctor, such as diagnosis and treatment of illness).6 I will focus on the complementary functions. The real potential of team care to improve health outcomes and reduce healthcare costs is the ability to increase the number and quality of services available.

Effective team care for chronic illness often involves professionals outside the group of individuals working in a single practice; it may involve multiple practices---for example, primary and specialist care---or it may involve multiple organisations, such as a general practice and a community agency. Teams that cross practice or organisational boundaries may create communication and administrative nightmares but are essential for optimising care for many patients.7

    Effectiveness of team care

Most successful interventions in chronic disease management entail the delegation of responsibility by the primary care doctor to team members for ensuring that patients receive proved clinical and self management support services. 2-4 8 Often the team is more effective with the addition of new disciplines, such as clinical pharmacy9 or nursing case management.8 Effective chronic illness programmes tend to exploit the varied skills of the team by using the following strategies.

Population based care---Population based care is an approach to planning and delivering care to defined patient populations that tries to ensure that effective interventions reach all patients who need them.10 It begins with a protocol or guideline that defines the components (assessments and treatments) of high quality care. The steps required to deliver the interventions are specified and delegated to members of the team. Taplin and colleagues have described the planning and task delegation of population based care in a single primary care practice. 11 12

Treatment planning---Treatment plans for each patient seem to be essential features of effective chronic illness programmes, and more formal, written plans help to organise the work of teams and help patients to navigate the complexities of multidisciplinary care. Plans that include patients' treatment preferences are more likely to result in satisfied, compliant patients. 13 14

Evidence based clinical management---Advances in medicine have increased the number of chronic conditions that can be successfully treated but have also increased the complexity of regimens. The identification or addition of team members to achieve greater concordance with complex treatment protocols by providers and patients has significantly improved outcomes in several chronic conditions.15-20 One major advantage of non-medical staff may be that the legal constraints placed on their decision making increase the rigour with which they follow protocols. Becker and colleagues, for example, compared the effects of lipid management by nurses with the effects of primary care on the lipid concentrations of high risk patients.21 Even though both groups of professionals had access to guidelines and educational materials, patients randomised to the nurse intervention were 2.5 times more likely to reach their goal cholesterol concentration.

Self management support---Growing evidence exists that educational and supportive interventions directed at helping patients to change risky behaviours or become better self managers improve outcomes across a range of chronic illnesses.14 Effective interventions tend to emphasise the acquisition of skills rather than just knowledge and systematically try to bolster patients' motivation and their confidence in managing their condition rather than encourage dependency. Most doctors have neither the training nor the time to engage in counselling on behaviour change or to give self management support.22 The advantages of the team having a nurse trained in behavioural counselling, or other professionals, are illustrated by several studies. 15 17 18

More effective consultations---The limitations of a brief consultation with a chronically ill patient, who will have multiple needs, are obvious. Clinics run for patients with similar needs---for example, asthma or diabetic clinics---are a part of medical practice in the United Kingdom. 23 24 Beck and colleagues studied "group consultations" (consultations with several patients at once) for older patients in a randomised trial and found that such patients were more satisfied, more up to date in their preventive care, and used health services less often than comparison patients.25 Group consultations may provide a particularly efficient vehicle for the complementary functions of team care.

Sustained follow up---Close follow up ensures early detection of adverse effects, problems in compliance, failure to respond to treatment, and recrudescence of symptoms. It affords opportunities to solve problems and demonstrate the concern of the care team. Many of the successful interventions described above rely on a practice initiating follow up of patients. Randomised trials have shown the effectiveness of telephone follow up by nurses or other staff in chronic illness care. 14 26-28

    Team composition for effective chronic disease management

Nurse case managers
Most successful chronic disease interventions in the literature involve a nurse with additional experience or training in the clinical and behavioural treatment of a chronic disease. The nurses may be nurse practitioners, advanced practice nurses with additional degrees in medical areas, or nurses with additional experience and credentials in a particular chronic disease. The nurses personally "manage" patients by protocol, adding clinical and self management skills as well as greater intensity of care. Most such innovations described in the literature involve a centralised nurse case manager working with several practices or a somewhat independent provider of services based in a related institution, such as a "senior centre" (day centre for elderly people)29 or hospital.17 In many settings, however, the intent of case management is discharge planning or reduction in health services use, not clinical improvement.30 Arranging transfers without managing the condition may not benefit patients. 28 31 32


(Credit: STEVE SHELTON/AP PHOTO)

View larger version (76K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Team care may benefit patients with chronic disease; here, a diabetic patient receives advice from his home health nurse via telemedicine

A critical question facing those seeking to replicate such programmes is whether a practice nurse or pharmacist can or will manage a patient's glycaemic control or heart failure regimen, as did the more specialised nurses in these studies. Clearly the answer depends largely on the training of the case managers and their support from the team doctor(s). In effective case management interventions a well trained nurse communicated regularly with both the primary care doctors and a supporting medical specialist---for example, an endocrinologist or cardiologist.8

Medical specialists
An interesting feature of many effective US chronic disease management programmes in primary care is the involvement of relevant medical specialists beyond their usual roles as consultants by referral. The involvement may be direct, as in the work of Katon and colleagues with depressed patients where psychiatrists alternated visits with the primary care doctor.16 Alternatively, specialist input may be mediated through nurse case managers who discuss patients regularly with a defined specialist member of the management programme. 15 17 18 33 Still another model is the population based expert team developed at Group Health Cooperative, where a diabetologist and nurse educator visit primary care practices by invitation to see patients with the primary care team and establish a model for good diabetes care. 34 35 Whether the involvement of specialists is critical to success or merely a characteristic of programmes that tend to be evaluated and published is unclear.

Clinical pharmacists
There have been many studies of attempts to integrate pharmacists into the primary care team. These efforts have been recently reviewed by the Cochrane Collaboration, which concludes that, although the studies are generally of poor quality, they suggest positive effects on prescribing behaviour, a reduction in use of health services, and improved patient outcomes.9 Pharmacist team members may especially contribute to the care of chronic illness by optimising drug regimens to reduce adverse effects 36 37 and increase efficacy.19

Social workers
Relatively few empirical data exist on the utility of social workers' involvement in patient care teams. A Medline search found fewer than five randomised trials of such involvement in medical care published in English since 1966. The three trials most relevant to primary care investigated the efficacy of social work in the care of chronically ill children,38 stroke survivors,39 and the carers of patients with Alzheimer's disease.40 None of these trials showed improvements in key outcomes over usual care. None the less, social workers are considered essential members of evaluation and management teams for elderly people, where the acquisition of community resources and the integration of patients back into the community are central features of the management plan. Clearly more research is needed to clarify the potential contributions of social work to chronic disease management.

Lay health workers
Lay health workers have long played a crucial part in health care in developing countries. They have also been widely used in the US community health centre and hospice movements, and evidence is growing attesting to their value in patient care teams that work in low income communities. 41 42 43 Community health workers, or health aides, have important roles in bridging the language and cultural gaps between middle class health professionals and ethnically and culturally different patient populations. Lay volunteers who have experienced certain illnesses have also been used to support and coach patients facing similar challenges.44 Lorig and colleagues have shown the effectiveness of self management programmes led by lay workers for patients with arthritis44 and for chronic illness in general.45

    Conclusion

Over the past two decades, intervention studies have begun to clarify the advantages to chronically ill patients of care by a team, and the particular team roles and functions associated with better outcomes. The involvement of, or even leadership by, appropriately trained nurses or other staff who complement the doctor in critical care functions (such as assessment, treatment management, self management support, and follow up) has been shown repeatedly to improve professionals' adherence to guidelines and patients' satisfaction, clinical and health status, and use of health services. Chronically ill patients will benefit from a care team that includes skilled clinicians and educators who have both clinical skills and self management support skills and population managers who understand team function and public health principles and approaches. Practice nurses and pharmacists can perform these roles if they have the requisite training, but many do not. Some patients with greater needs may benefit from the involvement of medical specialists, and lay health workers may ease the difficulties of caring for vulnerable populations.

Patient care teams in primary care have the potential to improve the quality of care for patients with chronic illness if the roles of team members are clearly defined and explicitly delegated and if team members are trained for their roles. But the presence of a trained team may be of little help if doctors cannot share care effectively1 or if a practice's lack of organisation limits the availability of staff to work in these complementary roles. With appropriate training and effective teamwork, primary care teams make it possible to manage complex chronic illnesses intensively without losing the benefits of comprehensive, continuous primary care. 6 46-48

    Footnotes

   Funding: Supported by grants from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

Competing interests: None declared.

    References

1. Pearson P, Jones K. The primary health care non-team? BMJ 1994; 309: 1387-1388[Free Full Text].
2. Calkins E, Boult C, Wagner EH, Pacala J, eds. New ways to care for older people. New York: Springer, 1998.
3. Wagner EH, Austin BT, von Korff M. Organizing care for patients with chronic illness. Milbank Q 1996; 74: 511-544[Medline].
4. Wagner EH. Chronic disease management: what will it take to improve care for chronic illness? Effective Clin Pract 1998; 1(1): 2-4.
5. Wagner EH, Davis C, Schaefer J, Von Korff M, Austin B. A survey of leading chronic disease management programs: are they consistent with the literature? Manage Care Q 1997(3);56-66.
6. Starfield B. Primary care: concept, evaluation, and policy. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.
7. Pritchard P, Hughes J. Shared care: the future imperative? London: Royal Society of Medicine Press, 1995.
8. Wagner EH. More than a case manager. Ann Intern Med 1998; 129: 654-656[Free Full Text].
9. Bero LA, Mays NB, Barjesteh K, Bond C. Abstract of review: expanding outpatient pharmacists' roles and health services utilisation, costs, and patient outcomes. In: Cochrane Collaboration,ed. Cochrane Library. Issue 1. Oxford: Update Software, 2000.
10. Wagner EH. Population-based management of diabetes care. Patient Education and Counselling 1995; 26: 225-230[CrossRef][Medline].
11. Payne TH, Galvin MS, Taplin SH, Austin B, Savarino J, Wagner EH. Practicing population-based care in a health maintenance organization: evaluation after 18 months. HMO Practice 1995; 9(3): 101-106.
12. Taplin S, Galvin M, Payne T, Coole D, Wagner E. Putting population-based care into practice: real option or rhetoric? J Am Board Fam Pract 1998; 11(2): 116-126[Abstract].
13. Delbanco TL, Daley J. Through the patient's eyes: strategies toward more successful contraception. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 88(suppl 3): 415-425[Abstract].
14. Von Korff M, Gruman J, Schaefer J, Curry SJ, Wagner EH. Collaborative management of chronic illness: essential elements. Ann Intern Med 1997; 127: 1097-1102[Abstract/Free Full Text].
15. DeBusk RF, Houston-Miller N, Superko R, Dennis CA, Thomas RJ, Lew HT, et al. A case-management system for coronary risk factor modification after acute myocardial infarction. Ann Intern Med 1994; 120: 721-729[Abstract/Free Full Text].
16. Katon W, Von Korff M, Lin E, Walker E, Simon GE, Bush T, et al. Collaborative management to achieve treatment guidelines. JAMA 1995; 273: 1026-1031[Abstract].
17. Rich MW, Beckham V, Wittenberg C, Leven CL, Freedland KE, Carney RM. A multidisciplinary intervention to prevent the readmission of elderly patients with congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med 1995; 333: 1130-1195.
18. Aubert RE, Herman WH, Waters J, Moore W, Sutton D, Peterson BL, et al. Nurse case management to improve glycemic control in diabetic patients in a health maintenance organization. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 1998; 129: 605-621[Abstract/Free Full Text].
19. Bogden PE, Abbott RD, Williamson P, Onopa JK, Koontz LM. Comparing standard care with a physician and pharmacist team approach for uncontrolled hypertension. J Gen Intern Med 198; 13: 740-745[CrossRef][Medline].
20. Greineder DK, Loane KC, Parks P. A randomized controlled trial of a pediatric asthma outreach program. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1999; 103: 436-460[CrossRef][Medline].
21. Becker DM, Raqueno JV, Yook RM, Kral BG, Blumenthal RS, Moy TF, et al. Nurse-mediated cholesterol management compared with enhanced primary care in siblings of individuals with premature coronary disease. Arch Intern Med 1998; 158: 1533-1539[Abstract/Free Full Text].
22. Kottke TE, Brekke ML, Solberg LI. Making "time" for preventive services. Mayo Clin Proc 1993; 68: 785-791[Medline].
23. Thorn PA, Russell RG. Diabetic clinics today and tomorrow: mini-clinics in general practice. BMJ 1973; ii: 534-536.
24. Farmer A, Coulter A. Organization of care for diabetic patients in general practice: influence on hospital admissions. Br J Gen Pract 1990; 40: 56-58[Medline].
25. Beck A, Scott J, Williams P, Robertson, Jackson D, Gade G, et al. A randomized trial of group outpatient visits for chronically ill older HMO members: the Cooperative Health Care Clinic. J Am Geriatr Soc 1997; 45: 543-549[Medline].
26. Wasson J, Gaudette C, Whaley F, Sauvigne A, Baribeau P, Welch HG. Telephone care as a substitute for routine clinic follow-up. JAMA 1992; 267: 1828-1829[CrossRef][Medline].
27. Maisiak R, Austin J, Heck L. Health outcomes of two telephone interventions for patients with rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1996; 19: 1391-1399.
28. Weinberger M, Oddone EZ, Henderson WG, for the Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group on Primary Care and Hospital Readmission. Does increased access to primary care reduce hospital readmissions? N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 1441-1447[Abstract/Free Full Text].
29. Leveille SG, Wagner EH, Davis C, Grothaus L, Wallace J, LeGerfo M, et al. Preventing disability and managing chronic illness in frail older adults: a randomized trial of a community-based partnership with primary care. J Am Geriatr Soc 1998; 46: 1191-1198[Medline].
30. Pacala JT, Boult C, Hepburn KW, Kane RA, Kane RL, Malone JK, et al. Case management of older adults in health maintenance organizations. Am Geriatr Soc 1995; 43: 538-542.
31. Retchin SM, Brown Rs, Yeh Sc, Chu D, Moreno L. Outcomes of stroke patients in Medicare fee for service and managed care. JAMA 1997; 278: 119-124[Abstract].
32. Jolly K, Bradley F, Sharp S, Smith H, Thompson S, Kinmonth AL, et al. Randomised controlled trial of follow up care in general practice of patients with myocardial infarction and angina: final results of the Southampton heart integrated care project (SHIP). BMJ 1999; 318: 706-711[Abstract/Free Full Text].
33. Friedman NM, Gleeson JM, Kent MJ, Foris M, Rodriguez DJ. Management of diabetes mellitus in the Lovelace Health Systems' Episodes of care program. Effective Clin Pract 1998; 1(1): 5-11.
34. McCulloch D, Glasgow RE, Hampson SE, Wagner E. A systematic approach to diabetes management in the post-DCCT era. Diabet Care 1994; 17(7): 1-5[Abstract].
35. McCulloch DK, Price MJ, Hindmarsh M, Wagner EH. A population-based approach to diabetes management in a primary setting: early results and lessons learned. Effective Clin Pract 1998; 1(1): 12-22.
36. Hanlon JT, Weinberger M, Samsa GP, Schmader KE, Uttech KM, Lewis IK, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of a clinical pharmacist intervention to improve inappropriate prescribing in elderly outpatients with polypharmacy. Am J Med 1996; 100: 428-437[CrossRef][Medline].
37. Leape LL, Cullen DJ, Clapp MD, Burdick E, Demonaco HJ, Erickson JI, et al. Pharmacist participation on physician rounds and adverse drug events in the intensive care unit. JAMA 1999; 21: 267-270.
38. Nolan T, Zvagulis I, Pless B. Controlled trial of social work in childhood chronic illness. Lancet 1987; 2: 411-415[CrossRef][Medline].
39. Christie D, Weigall D. Social work effectiveness in two-year stroke survivors: a randomised controlled trial. Community Health Studies 1984; 8: 26-32[Medline].
40. Weinberger M, Gold DT, Divine GW, Cowper PA, Hodgson LG, Schreiner PJ, et al. Social service interventions for caregivers of patients with dementia: impact on health care utilization and expenditures. J Am Geriatr Soc 1993; 41: 153-156[Medline].
41. Witmer A, Seifer SD, Finocchio L, Leslie J, O'Neil EH. Community health workers: integral members of the health care work force. Am J Public Health 1995; 85: 1055-1058[Medline].
42. Corkery E, Palmer C, Foley ME, Schechter CB, Frisher L, Roman SH. Effect of a bicultural community health worker on completion of diabetes education in a Hispanic population. Diabet Care 1997; 20: 254-257[Abstract].
43. Navarro AM, Senn KL, McNicholas LJ, Kaplan RM, Roppe B, Campo MC, et al. Por La Vida model intervention enhances use of cancer screening tests among Latinas. Am J Prev Med 1998; 15(1): 32-41[CrossRef][Medline].
44. Lorig KR, Mazonson PD, Holman HR. Evidence suggesting that health education for self-management in patients with chronic arthritis has sustained health benefits while reducing health care costs. Arthritis Rheum 1993; 36: 439-446[Medline].
45. Lorig KR, Sobel DS, Stewart AL, Brown Jr BW, Bandura A, Ritter P, et al. Evidence suggesting that a chronic disease self-management program can improve health status while reducing utilization and costs: a randomized trial. Medical Care 1999; 37(1): 5-14[CrossRef][Medline].
46. Becker MH, Drachman RH, Kirscht JP. Continuity of pediatrician: new support for an old shibboleth. J Pediatrics Med Care 1974; 84: 599-605.
47. Hjortdahl P, Laerum E. Continuity of care in general practice: effect on patient satisfaction. BMJ 1992; 304: 1287-1290.
48. Wasson JH, Sauvigne AE, Mogielnicki RP, Frey WG, Sox CH, Gaudette C, et al. Continuity of outpatient medical care in elderly men. A randomized trial. JAMA 1984; 252: 2413-2417[Abstract].

(Accepted 2 February 2000)

© BMJ 2000

Related Articles

The future of primary care nurses and health visitors
Christopher Derrett and Lydia Burke
BMJ 2006 333: 1185-1186. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Advances in managing chronic disease
Ronald M Davis, Edward G Wagner, and Trish Groves
BMJ 2000 320: 525-526. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Patients as partners in managing chronic disease
Halsted Holman and Kate Lorig
BMJ 2000 320: 526-527. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Funnell, M. M., Brown, T. L., Childs, B. P., Haas, L. B., Hosey, G. M., Jensen, B., Maryniuk, M., Peyrot, M., Piette, J. D., Reader, D., Siminerio, L. M., Weinger, K., Weiss, M. A. (2008). National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education. Diabetes Care 31: S97-S104 [Full text]  
  • van Bussel, B, Pijpers, E, Ferreira, I, Castermans, P, Kruseman, A N. (2007). Polymorbidity in diabetes in older people: consequences for care and vocational training. Postgrad. Med. J. 83: 763-767 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Zweifler, J. (2007). The Missing Link: Improving Quality With a Chronic Disease Management Intervention for the Primary Care Office. Ann Fam Med 5: 453-456 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Tomlinson, J. (2007). How Do We Re-Design the Treatment?: A Background Paper prepared for the UK Consensus Conference on Early Chronic Kidney Disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant 22: ix39-ix44 [Full text]  
  • Funnell, M. M., Brown, T. L., Childs, B. P., Haas, L. B., Hosey, G. M., Jensen, B., Maryniuk, M., Peyrot, M., Piette, J. D., Reader, D., Siminerio, L. M., Weinger, K., Weiss, M. A. (2007). National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education. The Diabetes Educator 33: 599-614 [Full text]  
  • Vrijhoef, H.J.M., Van Den Bergh, J.H.A.M., Diederiks, J.P.M., Weemhoff, I., Spreeuwenberg, C. (2007). Transfer of care for outpatients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease from respiratory care physician to respiratory nurse a randomized controlled study. Chronic Illness 3: 130-144 [Abstract]  
  • Funnell, M. M., Brown, T. L., Childs, B. P., Haas, L. B., Hosey, G. M., Jensen, B., Maryniuk, M., Peyrot, M., Piette, J. D., Reader, D., Siminerio, L. M., Weinger, K., Weiss, M. A. (2007). National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education. Diabetes Care 30: 1630-1637 [Full text]  
  • Crespo, R., Shrewsberry, M. (2007). Factors Associated With Integrating Self-Management Support Into Primary Care. The Diabetes Educator 33: 126S-131S [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Siminerio, L. M., Funnell, M. M., Peyrot, M., Rubin, R. R. (2007). US Nurses' Perceptions of Their Role in Diabetes Care: Results of the Cross-national Diabetes Attitudes Wishes and Needs (DAWN) Study. The Diabetes Educator 33: 152-162 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Derrett, C., Burke, L. (2006). The future of primary care nurses and health visitors. BMJ 333: 1185-1186 [Full text]  
  • Lempp, H., Scott, D. L., Kingsley, G. H. (2006). Patients' views on the quality of health care for rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 45: 1522-1528 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Bauer, M. S., McBride, L., Williford, W. O., Glick, H., Kinosian, B., Altshuler, L., Beresford, T., Kilbourne, A. M., Sajatovic, M., and Coauthors for the Cooperative Studies Program, (2006). Collaborative Care for Bipolar Disorder: Part I. Intervention and Implementation in a Randomized Effectiveness Trial. Psychiatr. Serv. 57: 927-936 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Bauer, M. S., McBride, L., Williford, W. O., Glick, H., Kinosian, B., Altshuler, L., Beresford, T., Kilbourne, A. M., Sajatovic, M., and Coauthors for the Cooperative Studies Program, (2006). Collaborative Care for Bipolar Disorder: Part II. Impact on Clinical Outcome, Function, and Costs. Psychiatr. Serv. 57: 937-945 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Casas, A., Troosters, T., Garcia-Aymerich, J., Roca, J., Hernandez, C., Alonso, A., del Pozo, F., de Toledo, P., Anto, J. M., Rodriguez-Roisin, R., Decramer, M., members of the CHRONIC Project, (2006). Integrated care prevents hospitalisations for exacerbations in COPD patients. Eur Respir J 28: 123-130 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Hroscikoski, M. C., Solberg, L. I., Sperl-Hillen, J. M., Harper, P. G., McGrail, M. P., Crabtree, B. F. (2006). Challenges of Change: A Qualitative Study of Chronic Care Model Implementation. Ann Fam Med 4: 317-326 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Horvitz-Lennon, M., Kilbourne, A. M., Pincus, H. A. (2006). From silos to bridges: meeting the general health care needs of adults with severe mental illnesses.. Health Aff (Millwood) 25: 659-669 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Piatt, G. A., Orchard, T. J., Emerson, S., Simmons, D., Songer, T. J., Brooks, M. M., Korytkowski, M., Siminerio, L. M., Ahmad, U., Zgibor, J. C. (2006). Translating the Chronic Care Model Into the Community: Results from a randomized controlled trial of a multifaceted diabetes care intervention. Diabetes Care 29: 811-817 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Adams, R. J., Wilson, D. H., Taylor, A. W., Daly, A., Tursan d'Espaignet, E., Dal Grande, E., Ruffin, R. E. (2006). Coexistent chronic conditions and asthma quality of life: a population-based study.. Chest 129: 285-291 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Solberg, L. I., Trangle, M. A., Wineman, A. P. (2005). Follow-Up and Follow-Through of Depressed Patients in Primary Care: The Critical Missing Components of Quality Care. J Am Board Fam Med 18: 520-527 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Campo, J. V., Shafer, S., Strohm, J., Lucas, A., Cassesse, C. G., Shaeffer, D., Altman, H. (2005). Pediatric Behavioral Health in Primary Care: A Collaborative Approach. J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc 11: 276-282 [Abstract]  
  • Woolf, S. H., Glasgow, R. E., Krist, A., Bartz, C., Flocke, S. A., Holtrop, J. S., Rothemich, S. F., Wald, E. R. (2005). Putting It Together: Finding Success in Behavior Change Through Integration of Services. Ann Fam Med 3: S20-S27 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Gask, L. (2005). Role of specialists in common chronic diseases. BMJ 330: 651-653 [Full text]  
  • Campbell, C., McGauley, G. (2005). Doctor-patient relationships in chronic illness: insights from forensic psychiatry. BMJ 330: 667-670 [Full text]  
  • Ross, F., Harris, R. (2005). Can interprofessional education make a difference in the care of people with chronic disease?. Chronic Illness 1: 81-86 [Abstract]  
  • Cowie, A. (2005). The dynamic effect on nursing of a changing health service: A Scottish perspective. Journal of Research in Nursing 10: 27-44 [Abstract]  
  • Glasgow, R. E., Ory, M. G., Klesges, L. M., Cifuentes, M., Fernald, D. H., Green, L. A. (2005). Practical and Relevant Self-Report Measures of Patient Health Behaviors for Primary Care Research. Ann Fam Med 3: 73-81 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Farrell, K., Wicks, M. N., Martin, J. C. (2004). Chronic Disease Self-Management Improved with Enhanced Self-Efficacy. Clin Nurs Res 13: 289-308 [Abstract]  
  • Levinson, W., Lurie, N. (2004). When Most Doctors Are Women: What Lies Ahead?. ANN INTERN MED 141: 471-474 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Epping-Jordan, J E, Pruitt, S D, Bengoa, R, Wagner, E H (2004). Improving the quality of health care for chronic conditions. Qual Saf Health Care 13: 299-305 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Guerriero Austrom, M., Damush, T. M., West Hartwell, C., Perkins, T., Unverzagt, F., Boustani, M., Hendrie, H. C., Callahan, C. M. (2004). Development and Implementation of Nonpharmacologic Protocols for the Management of Patients With Alzheimer's Disease and Their Families in a Multiracial Primary Care Setting. Gerontologist 44: 548-553 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Roy-Byrne, P. P., Sherbourne, C. D., Craske, M. G., Stein, M. B., Katon, W., Sullivan, G., Means-Christensen, A., Bystritsky, A. (2004). Moving Treatment Research From Clinical Trials to the Real World. Focus 2: 410-415 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Reiber, G. E., Au, D., McDonell, M., Fihn, S. D. (2004). Diabetes Quality Improvement in Department of Veterans Affairs Ambulatory Care Clinics: A group-randomized clinical trial. Diabetes Care 27: B61-B68 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Grumbach, K., Bodenheimer, T. (2004). Can Health Care Teams Improve Primary Care Practice?. JAMA 291: 1246-1251 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Plantinga, L. C., Fink, N. E., Sadler, J. H., Levey, A. S., Levin, N. W., Rubin, H. R., Coresh, J., Klag, M. J., Powe, N. R. (2004). Frequency of Patient-Physician Contact and Patient Outcomes in Hemodialysis Care. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 15: 210-218 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Oxman, T. E., Dietrich, A. J., Schulberg, H. C. (2003). The Depression Care Manager and Mental Health Specialist as Collaborators Within Primary Care. AJGP 11: 507-516 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Deeter-Schmelz, D. R., P. Ramsey, R. (2003). An Investigation of Team Information Processing in Service Teams: Exploring the Link between Teams and Customers. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 31: 409-424 [Abstract]  
  • Kane, R. L. (2003). The Contribution of Geriatric Health Services Research to Successful Aging. ANN INTERN MED 139: 460-462 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Bodenheimer, T., Majeed, A., Bindman, A. B (2003). Primary care in the United States: Innovations in primary care in the United States * Commentary: What can primary care in the United States learn from the United Kingdom?. BMJ 326: 796-799 [Full text]  
  • Roy-Byrne, P. P., Sherbourne, C. D., Craske, M. G., Stein, M. B., Katon, W., Sullivan, G., Means-Christensen, A., Bystritsky, A. (2003). Moving Treatment Research From Clinical Trials to the Real World. Psychiatr. Serv. 54: 327-332 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Rothman, A. A., Wagner, E. H. (2003). Chronic Illness Management: What Is the Role of Primary Care?. ANN INTERN MED 138: 256-261 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Druss, B. G., Marcus, S. C., Olfson, M., Tanielian, T., Pincus, H. A. (2003). Trends in Care by Nonphysician Clinicians in the United States. NEJM 348: 130-137 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Zapka, J. G., Taplin, S. H., Solberg, L. I., Manos, M. M. (2003). A Framework for Improving the Quality of Cancer Care: The Case of Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 12: 4-13 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Hernandez, C., Casas, A., Escarrabill, J., Alonso, J., Puig-Junoy, J., Farrero, E., Vilagut, G., Collvinent, B., Rodriguez-Roisin, R., Roca, J., and partners of the CHRONIC project, (2003). Home hospitalisation of exacerbated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients. Eur Respir J 21: 58-67 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Unutzer, J., Katon, W., Callahan, C. M., Williams, J. W. Jr, Hunkeler, E., Harpole, L., Hoffing, M., Della Penna, R. D., Noel, P. H., Lin, E. H. B., Arean, P. A., Hegel, M. T., Tang, L., Belin, T. R., Oishi, S., Langston, C., for the IMPACT Investigators, (2002). Collaborative Care Management of Late-Life Depression in the Primary Care Setting: A Randomized Controlled Trial. JAMA 288: 2836-2845 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Steiner, W. A, Ryser, L., Huber, E., Uebelhart, D., Aeschlimann, A., Stucki, G. (2002). Use of the ICF Model as a Clinical Problem-Solving Tool in Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Medicine. ptjournal 82: 1098-1107 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Swartz, L., Dick, J. (2002). Managing chronic diseases in less developed countries. BMJ 325: 914-915 [Full text]  
  • Wagner, E. H., Austin, B. T., Davis, C., Hindmarsh, M., Schaefer, J., Bonomi, A. (2001). Improving Chronic Illness Care: Translating Evidence Into Action. Health Aff (Millwood) 20: 64-78 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Druss, B. G., Marcus, S. C., Olfson, M., Tanielian, T., Elinson, L., Pincus, H. A. (2001). Comparing The National Economic Burden Of Five Chronic Conditions. Health Aff (Millwood) 20: 233-241 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Cheah, J. (2001). Chronic disease management: a Singapore perspective. BMJ 323: 990-993 [Full text]  
  • Oliver, S. M (2001). Living with failing lungs: the doctor-patient relationship. Fam Pract 18: 430-439 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Davis, R. M, Wagner, E. G, Groves, T. (2000). Advances in managing chronic disease. BMJ 320: 525-526 [Full text]  
  • Holman, H., Lorig, K. (2000). Patients as partners in managing chronic disease. BMJ 320: 526-527 [Full text]  
Tools
Services
Online poll
Find out more

Rapid responses for this article

There are no rapid responses for this article.

Student BMJ

Risk of surgery for inflammatory bowel disease: record linkage studies

What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+

www.student.bmj.com

Listen to the latest BMJ Interview