Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Roger A M J Damoiseaux a Department of General
Practice, University Medical Centre, Universiteitsweg 100, 3584 CG
Utrecht, Netherlands, b Department of General Practice and Julius Centre for Patient
Oriented Research, University Medical Centre
Correspondence to: R A M J Damoiseaux
R.A.M.J.Damoiseaux{at}med.uu.nl
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Objective:
To determine the effect of antibiotic
treatment for acute otitis media in children between 6 months and 2 years of age.
Antibiotics are currently the treatment of choice for
acute otitis media in nearly all countries,1 which is
rather surprising as their effectiveness seems limited in terms of
clinical improvement.2-7 Although the worldwide crisis of
multiple resistant strains of microbes underlines the importance of the
prevention of overuse and misuse of antibiotics, the Netherlands is
still the only country where only a minority of the episodes of acute
otitis media are treated with antibiotics.1
The outcome of acute otitis media in the Netherlands does
not seem to be any worse than that in other countries.1
Several authors have advocated restriction of antibiotic treatment for
acute otitis media to children at increased risk of poor outcome or
complications,
5 8
notably children under 2 years of
age,
4 9-14
although, surprisingly, there is virtually no
empirical evidence as to the effectiveness of such treatment in these
children.15 We therefore assessed outcome in a primary care based randomised trial of amoxicillin versus placebo.
Study population
Design:
Practice based, double blind, randomised, placebo controlled trial.
Setting:
53 general practices in the Netherlands.
Subjects:
240 children aged 6 months to 2 years with the diagnosis of acute otitis media.
Intervention:
Amoxicillin 40 mg/kg/day in three doses.
Main outcome measures:
Persistent symptoms at day four
and duration of fever and pain or crying, or both. Otoscopy at days
four and 11, tympanometry at six weeks, and use of analgesic.
Results:
Persistent symptoms at day four were less common in the amoxicillin group (risk difference 13%; 95% confidence interval 1% to 25%). The median duration of fever was two days in the
amoxicillin group versus three in the placebo group (P=0.004). No
significant difference was observed in duration of pain or crying, but
analgesic consumption was higher in the placebo group during the first
10 days (4.1 v 2.3 doses, P=0.004). In addition, no
otoscopic differences were observed at days four and 11, and tympanometric findings at six weeks were similar in both groups.
Conclusions:
Seven to eight children aged 6 to 24 months with acute otitis media needed to be treated with antibiotics to
improve symptomatic outcome at day four in one child. This modest
effect does not justify prescription of antibiotics at the first visit,
provided close surveillance can be guaranteed.
![]()
Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
The study was conducted between February 1996 and May 1998 in the Netherlands, where all patients are treated initially by their
own general practitioner. Children aged between 6 and 24 months were
eligible if they presented with acute otitis media
defined as
infection of the middle ear of acute onset and a characteristic ear
drum picture (injection along the handle of the malleus and the annulus
of the tympanic membrane or a diffusely red or bulging ear drum)
or
acute otorrhoea. In addition, one or more symptoms of acute infection
(fever, recent earache, general malaise, recent irritability) had to be
present, in line with the Dutch guidelines.8
Intervention
Patients received either amoxicillin suspension 40 mg/kg/day in three divided doses for 10 days or placebo suspension. Most patients in the Netherlands with acute otitis media receive decongestant nose drops, so all patients received one drop of oxymetazoline 0.025% in each nostril three times a day (Nasivin, Merck) for seven days. The use of paracetamol was allowed when the
child was in pain, the amount being recorded in the diary. For each
dose children under 1 year old received a 120 mg suppository and older
children received 240 mg.
Outcome measures
The primary outcome measure was persistent symptoms at day
four, assessed by the doctor and defined as persistent earache, fever
(
38oC), crying, or being irritable. In
addition the prescription of another antibiotic because of clinical
deterioration before the first follow up visit was to be considered a
persistent symptom.
38oC), pain,
or crying, defined as the number of days until the first day on which
these signs were considered absent and remained absent as recorded in
the diary by the parents; the mean number of doses of analgesics given,
based on the diaries; adverse effects mentioned in the diaries; and the
percentage of children with middle ear effusion at six weeks. The
diagnosis of effusion was based on combined otoscopy and tympanometry.
Type B and C2 tympanograms (modified Jerger's classification) were
regarded as indicative of the presence of fluid in the middle
ear.
17 18
Sample size and data analysis
Calculation of the sample size was based on the assumption
of a minimum difference of 20% in primary outcome between the groups,
with an
of 5%, a discriminating power of 80%, and an estimated
60% persistent symptoms in the placebo group.4 The total
number of children required in each treatment arm was 79.
Assignment and blinding
After we obtained consent the children were randomly
assigned to treatment with amoxicillin or with a placebo suspension
with the same colour and taste. The suspensions were supplied to the
participating doctors in a double blind fashion with computerised two
block randomisation; doctors, parents, and investigators remained
blinded throughout the study. During the trial the code of the
allocation schedule was kept in the pharmacy of the University Medical
Centre, Utrecht, and was broken only if severe complications or side
effects occurred.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Participant flow and follow up
Of the 425 children with acute otitis media registered, 362 were eligible, and
from these 240 were randomly assigned to one of the treatment groups
(figure). Children in the antibiotic group and the placebo group
differed in the prevalence of recurrent acute otitis media, regular
attendance at a day care centre, and parental smoking habits (table
1).
|
|
Outcome at day four
Persistent symptoms at day four
occurred in 69 out of 117 children (59%) in the amoxicillin group and in 89 of 123 (72%) in the placebo group (difference in risk 13%; 95%
confidence interval 1% to 25%) (table 2). Adjustment for recurrence,
day care, and smoking as possible confounders in the logistic
regression analyses showed an odds ratio of 1.79 (1.03 to 3.13). Among
children with persistent symptoms four (one in the amoxicillin group
and three in the placebo group) received other antibiotics. Three of
these children were admitted to hospital (one in the amoxicillin group,
two in the placebo group); one (placebo group) was admitted on the
third day with meningitis but because of deterioration this child had
already been started on another antibiotic on day two. The culture of
cerebrospinal fluid yielded negative results, but the Gram stain
suggested streptococcal meningitis. The two other children were
admitted because of dyspnoea (amoxicillin group) and dehydration
(placebo group). All four recovered without residual symptoms.
Inclusion of the one child lost to follow up (amoxicillin group) in
either outcome group did not materially change the
findings.
|
Outcome at day 11
Clinical treatment failure at day 11 occurred in 72 out of 112 children (64%) in the amoxicillin group and in 84 of 120 (70%) in the placebo group (6%;
6% to 18%) (table 2). Eleven children received other antibiotics (three in the amoxicillin group, eight in the placebo group) and were recorded as
treatment failures. One of these children (placebo group) needed admission to the hospital because of deterioration of symptoms of acute
otitis media. Six children (three in each group) were lost to follow up
between day four and day 11, and in one case (amoxicillin group) the
evaluation of the ear drum was missing, although the symptoms were
gone. A best case scenario (amoxicillin group analysed as "cured"
and placebo group as "not cured") did not show any significant
difference in clinical treatment failure at day 11 (9%;
3% to
21%).
Duration of fever and pain or crying
The median time to
cessation of fever was two days with amoxicillin and three days with placebo (P=0.004; log rank test). Median time to cessation of pain or
crying was eight days with amoxicillin and nine days with placebo
(P=0.432; log rank test).
Analgesic consumption
During the first three days, mean
analgesic consumption in the amoxicillin group was 1.7 doses and in the
placebo group 2.5 doses (P=0.018). Over the whole 10 days these figures
were 2.3 and 4.1, respectively (P=0.004).
Outcome at six weeks
At six weeks 212 children were
examined. Middle ear effusion was present in 69/107 (64%) in the
amoxicillin group and in 70/105 (67%) in the placebo group (3%;
10% to 16%). The proportion of children with bilateral effusion
was 48% in both groups. In addition, no clear differences were
observed between the two groups as regards recurrent acute otitis
media, use of antibiotics in this period, referrals to the
otolaryngologist or paediatrician, or surgery.
Adverse effects
De novo diarrhoea was reported on day
four in 17% (20/117) of the amoxicillin group and in 10% (12/123) of the placebo group (difference
7%;
16% to 2%). On day 10 these figures were 12% (14/117) and 8% (10/123), respectively (difference
4%;
12% to 4%). Of the children lost to follow up, five were withdrawn (all between day four and day 11) because of possible side
effects, two because of diarrhoea (both in the amoxicillin group) and
three because of skin rashes (all in the placebo group).
Compliance
According to the diaries the mean number of
doses of study medication taken was 24.6 (82% of possible total) in the amoxicillin group and 23.2 (76%) in the placebo group (P=0.9). According to the suspension remaining in the returned bottles, 80% of
the children in both groups had received the full amount, and 95%
received at least 80% of the amount prescribed.
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this study resolution of symptoms on day four was more common in those treated with amoxicillin than in those taking placebo. At day 11, no significant differences in symptoms and otoscopy results were observed. Amoxicillin shortened the duration of fever by one day, and analgesics were used more often in the placebo group.
|
What is already known about this subject
Several meta-analyses have shown that the effectiveness of antibiotics for acute otitis media is limited in terms of clinical improvement For children under 2 years of age This randomised study shows that seven to eight children, aged 6 to 24 months, with acute otitis media need to be treated with amoxicillin to improve symptomatic outcome at day four in one child This is not sufficiently important clinically to prescribe antibiotics for every child with acute otitis media in this age group Watchful waiting at the first visit is therefore justified for these children |
The significant reduction of the duration of fever observed in the amoxicillin group is in accord with the results of Burke et al in children aged 3 to 10 years.2 We observed no difference between the two groups in pain or crying. This was also reported by Burke et al, and the amounts of analgesics taken in their study were comparable with those in ours.2 The fact that more analgesics were used in the placebo group could explain the lack of difference in duration of pain or crying.
The number of children with persistent symptoms in our study was high compared with other studies. 2 19 Burke et al, however, included only older children and in young children symptoms are often prolonged. 4 9 Contrary to our results complete resolution of symptoms was not mentioned by Kaleida et al.19
Our diagnoses were based on acute signs of infection and abnormality of the ear drum; this has shown to be adequate in other studies 3 4 and is in accord with day to day practice in the Netherlands. An abnormal ear drum had to be seen because diagnosis based only on symptoms is not specific.20 According to the baseline characteristics the results in our sample are generalisable to the population seen in primary care in the Netherlands. 1 21
The treatment regimen we used (amoxicillin 40 mg/kg/daily) is still the treatment of first choice.22 The dosage was deemed sufficient because incidences of resistant Streptococcus pneumonia and Haemophilus influenzae in the Netherlands remain low at <1 %23 and 6% (data on file 1998, Dutch National Institute of Public Health and Environmental Protection), respectively, and compliance in this study was good.
As primary outcome measure we combined earache, crying, and
irritability because in these little children it is difficult to
establish earache as such. We have shown that seven to eight children
aged 6 to 24 months with acute otitis media needed to be treated to
improve symptomatic outcome at day four in one child. This is not
sufficiently important clinically to prescribe antibiotics for every
affected child within this age group. Routine prescription of
antibiotics would not prevent all cases of meningitis.24 Our conclusion is that watchful waiting at the first visit is justified
for these children. Instead of antibiotics analgesics could be given
for proper resolution of symptoms but more research is needed as to
whether this is a good alternative.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank all the general practitioners who included patients for this trial.
Contributors: RAMJD was responsible for the planning of the study, data collection and analysis. FAMvB, and RAdM designed the protocol and were the supervisors of RAMJD. AWH and TJMV assisted with the analysis of the results. The manuscript was prepared by RAMJD and commented on by all authors. RAMJD is the study guarantor.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Funding: Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (grant no 904-58-074).
Competing interests: Nasivin nose drops for this study were donated by E Merck Nederland BV.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Froom J, Culpepper L, Grob P, Barteld A, Bowers P, Bridges-Webb C, et al. Diagnosis and antibiotic treatment of acute otitis media: report from International Primary Care Network. BMJ 1990; 300: 582-586. |
| 2. | Burke P, Bain J, Robinson D, Dunleavy J. Acute red ear in children: controlled trial of non-antibiotic treatment in general practice. BMJ 1991; 303: 558-562. |
| 3. | Van Buchem FL, Dunk JHM, van't Hof MA. Therapy of acute otitis media: myringotomy, antibiotics, or neither? A double blind study in children. Lancet 1981; ii: 883-887. |
| 4. | Appelman CLM, Claessen JQPJ, Touw-Otten FWMM, Hordijk GJ, de Melker RA. Co-amoxiclav in recurrent acute otitis media: placebo controlled study. BMJ 1991; 303: 1450-1452. |
| 5. |
Froom J, Culpepper L, Jacobs M, de Melker RA, Green LA, van Buchem FL, et al.
Antimicrobials for acute otitis media? A review from the International Primary Care Network.
BMJ
1997;
315:
98-102 |
| 6. | Rosenfeld RM, Vertrees JE, Carr J, Cipolle RJ, Uden DL, Giebink GS, et al. Clinical efficacy of antimicrobial drugs for acute otitis media: meta-analysis of 5400 children from thirty-three randomized trials. J Pediatr 1994; 124: 355-367[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 7. |
Del Mar C, Glasziou P, Hayem M.
Are antibiotics indicated as initial treatment for children with acute otitis media? A meta-analysis.
BMJ
1997;
314:
1526-1529 |
| 8. | Appelman CLM, Bossen PC, Dunk JHM, Lisdonk EH, de Melker RA, van Weert HCPM. NHG standard otitis media acuta. (Guideline on acute otitis media of the Dutch College of General Practitioners.) Huisarts Wet 1990; 33: 242-245. |
| 9. | Hoberman A, Paradise JL, Burch DJ, Valinski WA, Hedrick JA, Aronovitz GH, et al. Equivalent efficacy and reduced occurrence of diarrhea from a new formulation of amoxicillin/clavulanate potassium for treatment of acute otitis media in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1997; 16: 463-470[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 10. | Laxdal OE, Merida J, Jones RHT. Treatment of acute otitis media: a controlled study of 142 children. Can Med Assoc J 1970; 102: 263-268[Medline]. |
| 11. |
Mandel EM, Casselbrant ML, Rockette HE, Bluestone CD, Kurs-Lasky M.
Efficacy of 20- versus 10-day antimicrobial treatment for acute otitis media.
Pediatrics
1995;
96:
5-13 |
| 12. | Alho OP, Laara E, Oja H. What is the natural course of recurrent acute otitis media in infancy? J Fam Pract 1996; 43: 258-264[Medline]. |
| 13. | Iino Y, Nakamura Y, Koizumi T, Toriyama M. Prognostic factors for persistent middle ear effusion after acute otitis media in children. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1993; 113: 761-765[Medline]. |
| 14. |
Hathaway TJ, Katz HP, Dershewitz R, Marx TJ.
Acute otitis media: who needs posttreatment follow-up?
Pediatrics
1994;
94:
143-147 |
| 15. | Damoiseaux RAMJ, van Balen FAM, Hoes AW, de Melker RA. Antibiotic treatment of acute otitis media in children under two years of age: evidence based? Br J Gen Pract 1998; 48: 1861-1864[Medline]. |
| 16. | Wormald PJ, Browning GG, Robinson K. Is otoscopy reliable? A structured teaching method to improve otoscopic accuracy in trainees. Clin Otolaryngol 1995; 20: 63-67[Medline]. |
| 17. | Jerger J. Clinical experience with impedance audiometry. Arch Otolaryngol 1970; 92: 311-324[Medline]. |
| 18. | Zielhuis GA, Heuvelmans-Heinen EW, Rach GH, van den Broek P. Environmental risk factors for otitis media with effusion in preschool children. Scand J Prim Health Care 1989; 7: 33-38[Medline]. |
| 19. |
Kaleida PH, Casselbrant ML, Rockette HE, Paradise JL, Bluestone CD, Blatter MM, et al.
Amoxicillin or myringotomy or both for acute otitis media: results of a randomized clinical trial.
Pediatrics
1991;
87:
466-474 |
| 20. | Kontiokari T, Koivunen P, Niemela M, Pokka T, Uhari M. Symptoms of acute otitis media. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1998; 17: 676-679[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 21. | Bruijnzeels MA, van Suijlekom-Smit LWA, van der Velden J, van der Wouden JC. The child in general practice. Dutch national study of morbidity and interventions in general practice. Utrecht: NIVEL, 1993. |
| 22. |
Berman S.
Otitis media in children.
N Engl J Med
1995;
332:
1560-1565 |
| 23. | Hermans PWM, Sluijter M, Elzenaar K, van Veen A, Schonkeren JJM, Nooren FM, et al. Penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in the Netherlands: results of a 1-year molecular epidemiologic survey. J Infect Dis 1997; 175: 1413-1422[Medline]. |
| 24. |
Rothrock SG, Harper MB, Green SM, Clark MC, Bachur R, McIlmail DP, et al.
Do oral antibiotics prevent meningitis and serious bacterial infections in children with streptococcus pneumoniae occult bacteremia? A meta-analysis.
Pediatrics
1997;
99:
438-444 |
(Accepted 11 November 1999)
Read all Rapid Responses
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+