Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Comparing the old world (before evidence based practice) and the
new world (with evidence based practice)
| Old world | New world | |
| Source of knowledge | Expert opinion | Systematic analysis of the evidence |
| Nature of clinical skills | Semi-mystical | Open to systematic analysis |
| Position of research | Marginal | Central |
| Essential skills | Clinical | Clinical plus ability to appraise evidence |
| Analysis of research | Haphazard | Systematic |
| Importance of gathering new evidence on patients | Low | High |
| Type of research | Clinical (often descriptive)
Pathophysiological Basic |
Clinical but based on epidemiological
principles
Evaluative |
| Essential information sources | Experts
Textbooks Selected journals |
Electronic access to all research
evidence
Cochrane Library |
| Importance of statisticians, epidemiologist, economists, etc | Low | High |
| Assumption that medical care is producing benefit | High | Low |
| Recognition that much of medical care may be ineffective or harmful | Low | High |
| Importance of keeping up to date, learning new skills | Lip service | Essential |
| Importance of access to research evidence | Low | High |
| Importance of systematic analysis of performance | Low | High |
| Organisational model | Hierarchical | Democratic, based in part on knowledge of evidence and ability to interpret it |
| Capacity of managers to get involved in the clinical process | Low | High |
| Nature of relationship to patients | Expert to pupil | Potentially much more equal |
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+