BMJ 2000;320:98-101 ( 8 January )
Clinical review
Recent advances
Nephrology
C R V Tomson, consultant renal physician.
North Bristol NHS Trust, Richard
Bright Renal Unit, Southmead Hospital, Westbury on Trym, Bristol BS10
5NB
tomson_c{at}southmead.swest.nhs.uk
Most doctors qualify with a knowledge that the kidney is an
important organ, that the diseases affecting it are complex, and that
renal physiology is difficult to understand. Once in clinical practice
confusion persists particularly over which patients should be referred
and when and, for instance, over whether angiotensin converting enzyme
inhibitors are uniquely effective at preventing progressive renal
failure or contraindicated in renal failure. Much of this confusion is
now unnecessary. Recent advances have clarified some aspects of renal
physiology: now the teachers understand them there is more hope of
explaining them to students. Knowledge of the various types of
glomerulonephritis is not necessary in deciding when a patient should
be referred: this decision is becoming increasingly important as the
potential for prevention of progressive renal disease increases.
 |
Methods |
This is an unsystematic review of those areas of nephrology in
which there have been recent advances, selected for a general readership. Space precludes coverage of advances in renal
transplantation. I have relied on personal files, recent articles in
the journals of international nephrology societies, Medline searches,
and discussions with colleagues.
|
Recent advances
Identification of the genetic basis for some rare disorders has
led to increased understanding of normal renal physiology and opened up
the possibility of new treatments for hyperparathyroidism and
hyponatraemic states
Major advances have occurred in the understanding of the pathogenesis
of IgA nephropathy and adult polycystic kidney disease, but as yet
these have not led to breakthroughs in the treatment of these
conditions
The reduction of proteinuria by antihypertensives slows the
progression towards end stage renal failure of many types of renal
disease angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors may have particular
value in reducing proteinuria unless systemic blood pressure is lowered
far enough
Although only a small proportion of affected patients benefit from
renal revascularisation, the high frequency of renal artery stenosis in
patients with atherosclerosis mandates regular monitoring of renal
function if angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors are used
|
 |
Renal physiology |
Identification of the genetic basis of some rare conditions has
led to increased understanding of normal renal physiology.
Water handling: aquaporins
Water reabsorption is stimulated by vasopressin, which is now
known to act by causing insertion of a water channel, aquaporin-2, into
the cell membrane of the collecting duct. Congenital nephrogenic
diabetes insipidus is caused by mutations in the vasopressin receptor
or the aquaporin-2 gene. Some forms of acquired nephrogenic diabetes
insipidus are associated with decreased expression of aquaporin-2.
Conversely, increased expression of aquaporin-2 results in increased
water reabsorption. Measurement of urinary aquaporin-2 concentrations
may prove useful in diagnosing disorders of sodium concentration, and
drugs that interfere with the vasopressin-aquaporin-2 axis are likely
to prove useful in the management of these disorders.1
Calcium handling: extracellular calcium receptors
Some rare genetic disorders of calcium homoeostasis illustrate the importance of the extracellular calcium receptor, which
allows parathyroid and renal tubular cells, among others, to
respond to changes in concentration of extracellular ionised calcium.
An increase in serum calcium concentration inhibits parathyroid hormone
secretion, 1-hydroxylation of vitamin D, and reabsorption of
sodium, chloride, calcium, magnesium, and water.
2 3
Mutations that decrease the receptor's sensitivity cause familial
benign hypercalcaemia with hypocalciuria; mutations that increase
sensitivity cause hypocalcaemia with hypercalciuria. Drugs that
stimulate the receptor are now under study for use in primary and
secondary hyperparathyroidism.
4 5
Sodium handling: monogenic causes of hypertension and salt
wasting
Several genetic causes of severe hypertension have been
identified, all of which affect renal sodium handling, supporting the
concept that hypertension is frequently caused by impaired ability to
excrete excess dietary sodium. Examples include Liddle's syndrome
(increased activity of a sodium reabsorbing channel in the distal
tubule and collecting duct); glucocorticoid remediable hypertension
(causing stimulation of aldosterone production by adrenocorticotrophic
hormone); and pseudohyperaldosteronism (genetic defect in
11-
-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase, which normally prevents cortisol
from having an aldosterone-like action in the kidney).
6 7
These diseases are rare, but such insights may lead to the
identification of more common polymorphisms in genes controlling sodium
excretion and enhance our understanding of "essential" hypertension.
Conversely, two diseases characterised by low blood pressure have been
shown to be caused by mutations that decrease sodium reabsorption:
Bartter's syndrome
caused either by impaired activity of the
sodium-potassium-2-chloride cotransporter (the major target for loop
diuretics) or by two related transporters; and Gitelman's syndrome
caused by impaired activity of the thiazide sensitive sodium
chloride cotransporter.8 The physiological
abnormalities in these syndromes illustrate the effects of high dose
permanent diuretic therapy.
 |
Glomerulonephritis |
Immunoglobulin A nephropathy is the commonest type of
glomerulonephritis and an important cause of end stage renal failure. The primary abnormality seems to be the production of abnormally glycosylated IgA in the bone marrow, resulting in decreased hepatic clearance of IgA1, mesangial deposition of IgA, and
glomerular inflammation.
9 10
No specific treatment is yet
available,11 although a recent trial showed benefit from
high dose steroids.12 Patients with risk markers for
progressive renal dysfunction (hypertension, proteinuria,
increasing serum creatinine concentration) should be offered treatment
based on existing trials or entered into a trial.
Uncertainty remains about how patients with microscopic or dipstick
haematuria without any of the above risk markers should be investigated
and managed once urological malignancy, stone disease, and crystalluria
have been excluded. A major proportion of these patients have IgA
nephropathy or another chronic glomerular disease that may be detected
by biopsy, but they have a low relative risk of end stage renal
disease,13 and it is reasonable to defer biopsy if
adequate (for example, annual) monitoring of risk markers for
progressive disease can be ensured.
 |
Small vessel vasculitis |
Wegener's granulomatosis and microscopic
polyangiitis
two major causes of pauci immune rapidly
progressive glomerulonephritis
are now often suggested by positive
tests for autoantibodies against enzymes present in the cytoplasm of
human neutrophils (antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies), although
false positives and false negatives still occur making biopsy
confirmation of the diagnosis mandatory. Whether these antibodies are
directly pathogenic remains uncertain.
 |
Adult polycystic kidney disease |
Adult polycystic kidney disease can be caused by mutation in one
of several genes, two of which have been identified. Polycystin-1 is a
large membrane bound protein, which probably regulates the interaction
between the cell and extracellular matrix or other cells.14 Polycystin-2 is probably a membrane bound ion
channel. Only 1%-2% of tubules become cystic although all cells carry
the mutation, suggesting that the cystic tubules are also affected by a
second somatic mutation either in the polycystin-1 gene or in another
gene encoding a protein that interacts with
polycystin-1.15 Patients are liable to progress more
rapidly if they are male or have polycystin-1 mutations, early onset
hypertension, episodes of gross haematuria,16 or a family
history of hypertension in the unaffected parent,17 but
these only account for a fraction of the variability of disease
progression. Despite the association of hypertension with more rapid
disease progression there is no convincing evidence that tighter blood
pressure control retards progression.18 Cyst decompression
may help to relieve pain but does not alter the rate of progression.
Indeed, there is currently no intervention that is known to alter the
clinical course of polycystic kidney disease, although several agents
are being tested in animal models.
 |
Chronic renal failure |
Patients who are referred for dialysis close to or at end stage
renal failure have a much poorer prognosis than those managed for at
least 3 months before needing dialysis or
transplantation.
19 20
Possible reasons for this include a
higher prevalence of comorbid illness in those referred late;
suboptimal management of anaemia, phosphate retention, bone disease,
acidosis, hypertension, dyslipidaemia, or nutritional state; and
inadequate medical and psychological preparation for dialysis, for
instance timely construction of arteriovenous fistulae. All
patients with potentially progressive chronic renal failure should
therefore be seen by a nephrologist unless the patient and doctor agree
that dialysis would be pointless; but it should be borne in mind that
many borderline patients who believe they are unsuitable for dialysis
and who may have the most to gain from earlier referral often change
their minds in extremis and end up being referred as a uraemic emergency.
 |
Progression of diabetic and non-diabetic renal disease |
Prevention of end stage renal failure is the main goal of
nephrology owing to the high morbidity and mortality from dialysis and
transplantation. For instance, 5 year survival rates for patients with
type 1 diabetes on renal replacement therapy are around 50%, similar
to the mortality from grade 2 stomach cancer. Although there are
occasional opportunities for primary prevention, the greatest potential
for prevention is in patients with slowly progressive renal
disease
for example, due to diabetes or chronic glomerulonephritis. Numerous mechanisms play a part in the progressive destruction of
glomeruli and tubules, some independent of the initiating disease process: these include glomerular hypertrophy, glomerular hypertension, and collagen deposition, all of which may be enhanced by angiotensin II. The DD genotype of angiotensin converting enzyme (the "D" allele conferring higher tissue and plasma angiotensin II
concentrations) is probably not a risk factor for the development of
diabetic nephropathy but may be associated with more rapid
progression.
11 21
In a wide variety of renal diseases hypertension and proteinuria
are potent predictors not only of cardiovascular disease but also
progressive deterioration in renal function. Proteinuria may be
quantified by measuring the protein:creatinine concentration in a spot
morning urine sample, and these measurements are as reliable as 24 hour
urine collections in predicting progression.22 For a given
reduction in systemic blood pressure, angiotensin converting enzyme
inhibitors reduce proteinuria to a greater extent than most other
antihypertensives, whereas dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers may
actually increase proteinuria despite a reduction in systemic blood
pressure. Proteinuria itself may be pathogenic, and the extent of
treatment induced reduction in proteinuria correlates with the
subsequent reduction in rate of loss of glomerular filtration rate. A
simplistic explanation for the antiproteinuric effect of angiotensin
converting enzyme inhibitors is that their intrarenal actions reduce
intraglomerular pressure thereby "protecting" the glomerulus from
systemic hypertension. This effect is amplified by restriction of
dietary sodium particularly in patients with the DD
genotype.23 The advantages of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors over other antihypertensives in slowing progression has been shown in several studies in diabetic and non-diabetic renal
disease,24-28 but this advantage may be lost if blood
pressure is lowered far enough, independent of the agent
used,
29 30
and is seen only in patients with significant
proteinuria. Two large studies have shown a higher risk of
cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes randomised to a
dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker compared with those receiving
an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor.
31 32
In the
UK prospective diabetes trial the absence of any benefit from
angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors over
blockade may have
been because of the extent to which blood pressure was lowered or to
the comparative infrequency of proteinuric nephropathy in the study
population.33 Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors may
also confer protection against progressive renal disease by
non-haemodynamic actions, such as suppression of other effects of
angiotensin II including glomerular hypertrophy (which may be
maladaptive), glomerulosclerosis, and altered basement membrane
permeability (fig 1).

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig 1.
Some mechanisms of progressive renal failure
and effects of treatment. Comparative contributions of high
intraglomerular pressure, maladaptive trophic changes resulting in
glomerular fibrosis, and tubular damage are debated and may vary
according to underlying disease. Not shown are possible contributions
of dyslipidaemia, intrarenal vascular damage, and phosphate retention
|
|
 |
Ischaemic renal vascular disease |
In most patients starting dialysis the only identifiable cause of
renal failure is atherosclerotic renal artery
disease.
34 35
Such patients frequently have widespread
atherosclerosis and a poor prognosis on dialysis. Atherosclerotic renal
artery stenosis, usually at the ostium or involving the proximal renal
artery, can be shown by angiography in 30%-50% of patients undergoing peripheral or coronary angiography and in a similar proportion of
patients with congestive cardiac failure. How to select patients for
renal angiography with a view to revascularisation is therefore an
important, and complicated, question. Not all patients with renal
artery disease, even if bilateral, have a major reduction in renal
function when treated with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors,
and most die from cardiovascular disease not from or with end stage
renal failure. Moreover, renal function does not always improve after
revascularisation and may even deteriorate,36 because
renal dysfunction in renal artery disease may result from nephrosclerosis, atheromatous ("cholesterol") embolism (fig
2),
37 38
or coincident renal disease as well as from
impaired renal perfusion.

View larger version (135K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig 2.
Renal biopsy showing two glomeruli and a vessel
that has been occluded by atheromatous embolism. Needle shaped clefts
in vessel are due to presence of cholesterol crystals, which are
dissolved out during processing
|
|
Indications for investigation with a view to revascularisation
include spontaneous progressive loss of renal function in a patient
with widespread atherosclerosis, a progressive increase in serum
creatinine concentration after initiation or increase in dose of an
angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, and recurrent pulmonary oedema
despite good left ventricular function.39 In all these
situations bilateral renal involvement is likely and this selection
policy does not therefore identify patients with unilateral disease,
which may progress to complete occlusion if undetected. Hypertension is
not always present and does not always improve after successful
revascularisation.
40 41
Further clinical research is
needed to refine these criteria, but indiscriminate angiography in
other patients with atherosclerosis and renal impairment should be
avoided. In most centres the utility of isotope renography, with or
without angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or aspirin, in
predicting success of revascularisation in preventing or reversing renal impairment is limited; these investigations are more useful in
identifying patients with renovascular hypertension and comparatively well preserved renal function. For most patients with congestive cardiac failure the cardiac benefits from angiotensin converting enzyme
inhibitors outweigh the renal risks42 provided that there is adequate biochemical monitoring to detect progressive deterioration in renal function in patients with ischaemic renal disease, in whom
continued use of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors is contraindicated.
 |
The future |
Given the costs of dialysis and transplantation, which may
eventually use up 2% of the NHS budget, together with the high morbidity and mortality from end stage renal failure, there is a need
for advances in prevention. Much could be achieved by applying existing
knowledge, for instance in the use of angiotensin converting enzyme
inhibitors and tight glycaemic control in diabetic nephropathy and in
early identification and referral of patients with progressive renal
disease. The recent discovery of the genetic basis for a rare form of
congenital nephrotic syndrome43 may lead to rapid advances
in understanding of the control of glomerular permeability. Additionally, there are likely to be major advances in understanding of
the pathogenesis of polycystic disease and glomerulonephritis, greater
understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of progressive renal
fibrosis and atrophy, and identification of new genetic markers for
susceptibility to progressive renal disease, all of which may lead to
effective treatments to prevent progressive renal failure.
 |
Footnotes |
Competing interests: CRVT has received
honoraria or consultancy fees from Astra, Baxter, Bayer, Fujisawa,
Janssen-Cilag, and Novartis.
 |
References |
| 1.
|
Connolly DL, Shanahan CM, Weissberg PL.
Water channels in health and disease.
Lancet
1996;
347:
210-212[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Hebert SC.
Extracellular calcium-sensing receptor: implications for calcium and magnesium handling in the kidney.
Kidney Int
1996;
50:
2129-2139[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Brown EM, Hebert SC.
A cloned extracellular Ca2+-sensing receptor: molecular mediator of the actions of extracellular Ca2+ on parathyroid and kidney cells?
Kidney Int
1996;
49:
1042-1046[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Silverberg SJ, Bone HG, Marriott TB, Locker FG, Thys-Jacobs S, Dziem G, et al.
Short-term inhibition of parathyroid hormone secretion by a calcium-receptor agonist in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism.
N Engl J Med
1997;
337:
1506-1510[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Nemeth EF, Bennett SA.
Tricking the parathyroid gland with novel calcimimetic agents.
Nephrol Dial Transplant
1988;
13:
1923-1925[Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Lifton RP.
Molecular genetics of blood pressure variation.
Science
1996;
272:
676-680[Abstract].
|
| 7.
|
Cusi D, Bianchi G.
A primer on the genetics of hypertension.
Kidney Int
1998;
54:
328-342[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Kurtz I.
Molecular pathogenesis of Bartter's and Gitelman's syndromes.
Kidney Int
1998;
45:
1396-1410.
|
| 9.
|
Allen AC, Harper S, Feehally J.
Origin and structure of pathogenic IgA in IgA nephropathy.
Biochem Soc Trans
1997;
25:
486-490[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Allen AC, Willis FR, Beattie J, Feehally J.
Abnormal IgA glycosylation in Henoch-Schonlein purpura restricted to patients with clinical nephritis.
Nephrol Dial Transplant
1998;
1998:
930-934.
|
| 11.
|
Donadio JV.
Immunoglobulin A nephropathy: a clinical perspective.
J Am Soc Nephrol
1997;
8:
1324-1332[Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Pozzi C, Bolasco PG, Fogazzi GB, Andrulli S, Altieri P, Ponticelli C, et al.
Corticosteroids in IgA nephropathy: a randomised controlled trial [see comments].
Lancet
1999;
353:
883-887[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Iseki K, Iseki C, Ikeyima Y, Fukiyama K.
Risk of developing end-stage renal disease in a cohort of mass screening.
Kidney Int
1996;
49:
800-805[Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Harris PC, Ward CJ, Peral B, Hughes J.
Polycystic kidney disease 1: identification and analysis of the primary defect.
J Am Soc Nephrol
1995;
6:
1125-1133[Abstract].
|
| 15.
|
Harris PC, Watson ML.
Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: neoplasia in disguise?
Nephrol Dial Transplant
1997;
12:
1089-1090[Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Johnson AM, Gabow PA.
Identification of patients with autosomal dominant polycystic disease at highest risk for end-stage renal disease.
J Am Soc Nephrol
1997;
8:
1560-1567[Abstract].
|
| 17.
|
Geberth S, Stier E, Zeier M, Mayer G, Rambausek M, Ritz E.
More adverse renal prognosis of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease in families with primary hypertension.
J Am Soc Nephrol
1995;
6:
1643-1648[Abstract].
|
| 18.
|
Klahr S, Breyer JA, Beck GJ, Dennis VW, Hartman JA, Roth D, et al.
Dietary protein restriction, blood pressure control, and the progression of polycystic kidney disease.
J Am Soc Nephrol
1995;
5:
2037-2047[Abstract].
|
| 19.
|
Khan IH, Catto G, Edward N, MacLeod AM.
Death during the first 90 days of dialysis: a case control study.
Am J Kidney Dis
1995;
25:
276-280[Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Ismail N, Neyra R, Hakim R.
The medical and economical advantages of early referral of chronic renal failure patients to renal specialists.
Nephrol Dial Transplant
1998;
13:
246-250[Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Kunz R, Bork JP, Fritzsche L, Ringel J, Sharma AM.
Association between the angiotensin-converting enzyme-insertion/deletion polymorphism and diabetic nephropathy: a methodologic appraisal and systematic review.
J Am Soc Nephrol
1998;
9:
1653-1663[Abstract].
|
| 22.
|
Ruggenenti P, Gaspari F, Oerna A, Remuzzi G.
Cross sectional longitudinal study of spot morning urine protein:creatinine ratio, 24 hour urine protein excretion rate, glomerular filtration rate, and end stage renal failure in chronic renal disease in patients without diabetes.
BMJ
1998;
16:
504-509.
|
| 23.
|
Van der Kleij FGH, Schmidt AA, Navis GJ, Haas M, Yilmaz N, de Jong PE, et al.
Angiotensin converting enzyme insertion/deletion polymorphism and short-term renal response to ACE inhibition: role of sodium status.
Kidney Int
1998;
53(suppl 63):
23-6S.
|
| 24.
|
Lewis EJ, Hunsicker LG, Bain RP, Rohde RD.
The effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition on diabetic nephropathy.
N Engl J Med
1993;
329:
1456-1462[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Kasiske BL, Kalil RSN, Ma JZ, Liao M, Keane WF.
Effect of antihypertensive therapy on the kidney in patients with diabetes: a meta-regression analysis.
Ann Intern Med
1993;
118:
129-138[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Maschio G, Alberti D, Janin G, Locatelli FF, Mann JFE, Motolese M, et al.
Effect of the angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor Benazepril on the progression of chronic renal insufficiency.
N Engl J Med
1996;
334:
939-945[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
|
The Gruppo Italiano di Studi Epidemiologici in Nefrologia Group.
Randomized placebo-controlled trial of effect of ramipril on decline in glomerular filtration rate and risk of terminal renal failure in proteinuric, non-diabetic nephropathy.
Lancet
1997;
349:
1857-1863[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 28.
|
Giatras I, Lau J, Levey AS.
Effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on the progression of nondiabetic renal disease: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.
Ann Intern Med
1997;
127:
337-345[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Weidmann P, Boehlen LM, de Courten M, Ferrari P.
Antihypertensive therapy in diabetic patients.
J Hum Hypertens
1992;
6(suppl 2):
523-536.
|
| 30.
|
Sawicki PT.
Do ACE inhibitors offer specific benefits in the antihypertensive treatment of diabetic patients?
Diabetologia
1998;
41:
598-602[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 31.
|
Estacio RO, Jeffers BW, Hiatt WR, Biggerstaff SL, Gifford N, Schrier RW.
The effect of nisoldipine as compared with enalapril on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes and hypertension.
N Engl J Med
1998;
338:
645-652[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 32.
|
Tatti P, Pahor M, Byington RP, Di Mauro P, Guarisco R, Strollo G, et al.
Outcome results of the fosinopril versus amlodipine cardiovascular events randomizzed trial (FACET) in patients with hypertension and NIDDM.
Diabetes Care
1998;
21:
597-603[Abstract].
|
| 33.
|
UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group.
Efficacy of atenolol and captopril in reducing risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 39.
BMJ
1998;
317:
713-720[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 34.
|
Devoy MAB, Tomson CRV, Edmunds ME, Feehally J, Walls J.
Deterioration in renal function associated with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor therapy is not always reversible.
J Intern Med
1992;
232:
493-498[Medline].
|
| 35.
|
Preston RA, Epstein M.
Ischemic renal disease: an emerging cause of chronic renal failure and end-stage renal disease.
J Hypertens
1997;
15:
1365-1377[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Mikhail A, Cook GJR, Reidy J, Scoble JE.
Progressive renal dysfunction despite successful renal artery angioplasty in a single kidney.
Lancet
1997;
349:
926[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 37.
|
Vidt DG, Eisele G, Gephardt GN, Tubbs R, Novick AC.
Atheroembolic renal disease: association with renal arterial stenosis.
Cleve Clin J Med
1988;
56:
407-413.
|
| 38.
|
Rhodes JM.
Cholesterol crystal embolism: an important "new" diagnosis for the general physician.
Lancet
1996;
347:
1641[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 39.
|
Missouris CG, Buckenham T, Vallance PJT, MacGregor GA.
Renal artery stenosis masquerading as congestive heart failure.
Lancet
1993;
341:
1521-1522[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 40.
|
Ramsay LE, Waller PC.
Blood pressure response to percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for renovascular hypertension: an overview of published series.
BMJ
1990;
300:
569-572.
|
| 41.
|
Rimmer JM, Gennari FJ.
Atherosclerotic renovascular disease and progressive renal failure.
Ann Intern Med
1993;
118:
712-719[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 42.
|
Krumholz HM.
Time to focus on the more typical heart-failure patients.
Lancet
1998;
352:
3-4[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 43.
|
Kestila M, Lenkkeri U, Manniko M, Lamerdin J, McCready P, Putaala H, et al.
Positionally cloned gene for a novel glomerular protein nephrin is mutated in congenital nephrotic syndrome.
Mol Cell
1998;
1:
575-582[CrossRef][Medline].
|
© BMJ 2000