Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Sharon Conroy a Academic Division of Child Health (University
of Nottingham), Derbyshire Children's Hospital, Derby DE22 3NE, b University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden, c University Children's Hospital, Marburg, Germany, d Mario Negri
Institute, Milan, Italy, e Department of Paediatrics
(Erasmus University Rotterdam), Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam,
Netherlands
Correspondence to: I Choonara
Imti.choonara{at}nottingham.ac.uk
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Objective:
To determine the extent of use of
unlicensed and off label drugs in children in hospital in five European countries.
Design:
Prospective study of drugs administered to children in general paediatric medical wards over four weeks.
Setting:
Children's wards in five hospitals (one each in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Germany, Italy, and the Netherlands).
Subjects:
Children aged 4 days to 16 years admitted to
general paediatric medical wards.
Main outcome measure:
Proportion of drugs that were
used in an unlicensed or off label manner.
Results:
2262 drug prescriptions were administered to
624 children in the five hospitals. Almost half of all drug prescriptions (1036; 46%) were either unlicensed or off label. Of
these 1036, 872 were off label and 164 were unlicensed. Over half of
the patients (421; 67%) received an unlicensed or off label drug prescription.
Conclusions:
Use of off label or unlicensed drugs to
treat children is widespread. This problem is likely to affect children throughout Europe and requires European action.
|
Key messages
|
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Many drugs used to treat children in hospital are either not licensed for use in children or are prescribed outside the terms of their product license (off label prescribing). 1 2 Examples of use of off label drugs include diazepam rectal solution in children under 1 year (not licensed for age group), amiloride tablets in any children (formulation), or rectal injection of lorazepam for a child with an acute seizure (route). An example of unlicensed use is the preparation of a suspension from a tablet by the hospital pharmacy.
Considerable concern exists within Europe3 and the
United States
4 5
about the use of unlicensed and off
label drugs in children. There is, however, little information
available on the extent to which these types of treatments are used.
The extent of use of unlicensed and off label drugs in the United
Kingdom has been reported in a paediatric intensive care
unit,6 paediatric medical and surgical
wards,2 and a neonatal intensive care unit.7
We wished to determine the extent of unlicensed and off label drug use
in several countries within the European Union. This is important in
view of the new European guidance on the clinical investigation of
medicinal products in children.8
| |
Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We studied a paediatric medical ward in each of the participating centres (Derby, United Kingdom; Uppsala, Sweden; Marburg, Germany; Bergamo, Italy; Rotterdam, Netherlands) prospectively for four consecutive weeks during 1998. The wards in Derby and Bergamo admitted mainly general paediatric patients, with Derby including children who had had surgery. The wards in Marburg and Uppsala had a mixture of general paediatric and respiratory cases (including cystic fibrosis). The ward in Rotterdam had the fewest general paediatric cases, containing children with cardiac, oncological, renal, and respiratory disease. Data on all patients admitted to the ward were collected by the investigator in each centre. The child's age, date of birth, weight, and diagnosis were recorded as well as details of all drugs administered (route of administration, dose, and indication for use). We did not include standard intravenous replacement solutions, flushes of 0.9% sodium chloride or heparin, blood products, oxygen, or drugs in clinical trials.
We assessed all drugs administered to determine if their use was
unlicensed and off label using a previously described classification system.
1 2
Categories of unlicensed use were modification of licensed drugs (such as crushing tablets to prepare a suspension); drugs that are licensed but the formulation is manufactured under a
special licence (such as a liquid preparation of a drug that is
licensed only in tablet form); new drugs available under a special
manufacturing licence (such as caffeine injections for apnoea of
prematurity); use of chemicals as drugs when no pharmaceutical grade
preparation is available; drugs used before a licence has been granted;
and imported drugs (drugs imported from a country where they are
licensed). Off label use included use of a drug in situations not
covered by the product licence or the summary of product
characteristics
that is, at a different dose or frequency, in
different clinical indications, in different age groups, administration by an alternative route, or in a formulation not approved for use in children.
The primary reference sources for determining licensed indications were
the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry's Data
Sheet Compendium in the United Kingdom; the Swedish
Physician's Desk Reference 1998 in Sweden; the Rote Liste
1996 and FachInfo compact disc (1997) in Germany; the
Informatore Farmaceutico 1998 (national formulary) and
technical leaflets in Italy; and the Repertorium 98/99 and
Farmacotherapeutisch Kompas 1998 in the Netherlands.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A total of 624 children were admitted to the general paediatric wards in the five participating centres and received 2262 drug prescriptions (table 1). The prescribing habits in the five centres differed greatly. Paracetamol was the most widely prescribed drug and analgesic in four of the five centres. Dipyrone was frequently used in Italy only. Salbutamol and cefuroxime were both widely used (table 2). Almost half of all drug prescriptions (1036) were either unlicensed or off label (table 1). Many more prescriptions were off label (872) than unlicensed (164). The results were remarkably similar in Derby, Uppsala, and Marburg. Use of unlicensed and off label drugs was greatest in Bergamo and Rotterdam, with Bergamo having the highest percentage of off label prescriptions (66%) and Rotterdam the highest percentage of unlicensed prescriptions (14%).
|
|
Over half of the children (421; 67%) received an unlicensed or off label drug prescription during their stay in hospital. Analgesics and bronchodilators were among the five most frequently prescribed off label drugs in four centres (table 3). The commonest category of off label drug use was dose and frequency in three centres (Uppsala, Marburg, and Bergamo), accounting for more than half of off label use. In the other two centres (Derby and Rotterdam) dose and frequency accounted for 31-32% of off label drug use. The main category for off label drug use in Rotterdam was formulation. Formulation was also an important category in Bergamo but not in the other centres. Age was the commonest category of off label drug use in Derby (table 4). Table 5 shows examples of off label drug use. In Bergamo 53% of the children who received beclometasone were under 12 months old, although it is licensed only for children aged 2 years and over in Italy.
|
|
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The drug use in the five paediatric wards differed. This is not surprising as each of the wards had different subspecialty interest and prescribing habits are different within each country.9 Unlicensed drug use was highest in Rotterdam, which had the highest number of patients with complex diseases. Many of these children received drugs that are not available in a paediatric formulation and therefore had to be modified by the pharmacy department to make them suitable for administration to children. Stability data are rarely available for such products, which are rendered unlicensed by this modification. Dipyrone is no longer available in many European countries because of the risk of agranulocytosis.10 It is, however, widely used in Italy. About half of the children in each of the five countries received drugs that are either unlicensed or off label.
It is concerning that most bronchodilator drug prescriptions for children in hospital with asthma are off label, since this is a common condition for which there has been considerable research. The efficacy of bronchodilators in children under the age of 2 years is variable, especially in infants under the age of 12 months. A particular problem was the widespread use of inhaled corticosteroids in children under the age of 2 years (off label for age and dose); few data exist on the effect of inhaled corticosteroids on growth suppression in this age group. Studies are required to determine whether the off label use of bronchodilators is justified by good scientific evidence.
The most common reasons for off label use were that the medicine was prescribed at a different dose or frequency, in a different formulation, or in an age group for which it had not been licensed. There were also some children who received the drug for a different indication or by an alternative route. It is ironic that it is children who are most likely to receive medicines that are either unlicensed or used off label since the regulations for the licensing of medicines were introduced after cases of drug toxicity in the developing fetus (thalidomide) and newborn infant (chloramphenicol induced grey baby syndrome).3
Not all off label drug use is inappropriate. Drug toxicity is more likely with aminoglycosides if they are used in neonates as recommended by the manufacturers at intervals of 8-12 hours rather than at longer intervals. In many cases, however, the risk of off label drug use is not known because there are inadequate data. A recent study has shown that adverse drug reactions are an important problem in children after unlicensed or off label drug prescriptions.11
Reducing the risk
The new European guidance on the clinical investigation of
medicinal products in children encourages pharmaceutical companies that
wish to introduce new products to investigate these in children when
clinically appropriate. Changes have also been made in the United
States to encourage pharmaceutical companies to carry out clinical
trials in children. These changes in regulations may improve knowledge
for new products, although a recent study found little improvement in
new drugs licensed in Europe.12 However, a major problem
remains with many existing drugs commonly used in children. Health
professionals concerned about the lack of information regarding the use
of drugs in children are in a difficult situation. They need to raise
awareness of the problem in society as a whole without causing undue
anxiety among parents.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
Contributors: IC initiated and designed the study, supervised the collection of data, analysed the data, and was involved in writing the paper. SC designed the data collection forms, coordinated and was involved in collecting and analysing the data, and was involved in writing the paper. AM, MPR, FR, GJ, and MH were involved in analysis of the data and in writing the paper. PI, HA, AR, CK, HS, CP, MB, and JA were involved in the design of the study, helped collect the data, analysed the data, and were involved in writing the paper.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Funding: None.
Competing interests: IC, AR, HS, and JA attended a round table meeting of experts on the use of new medicines in children organised by EMEA in 1997. IC has a grant from the Medicines Control Agency in the United Kingdom in relation to drug reaction surveillance in children.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Turner S, Nunn AJ, Choonara I. Unlicensed drug use in children in the UK. Paediatr Perinat Drug Ther 1997; 1: 52-55. |
| 2. |
Turner S, Longworth A, Nunn AJ, Choonara I.
Unlicensed and off label drug use in paediatric wards: prospective study.
BMJ
1998;
316:
343-345 |
| 3. |
Choonara I, Dunne J.
Licensing of medicines.
Arch Dis Child
1998;
78:
402-403 |
| 4. | Nahata MC. Licensing of medicines for children in the USA. Paediatr Perinat Drug Ther 1997; 1: 50-51. |
| 5. |
Cote CJ, Kauffman RE, Troendle GJ, Lambert GH.
Is the "therapeutic orphan" about to be adopted?
Pediatrics
1996;
98:
118-123 |
| 6. | Turner S, Gill A, Nunn T, Hewitt B, Choonara I. Use of "off-label" and unlicensed drugs in paediatric intensive care unit. Lancet 1996; 347: 549-550. |
| 7. |
Conroy S, McIntyre J, Choonara I.
Unlicensed and off label drug use in the neonate.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed
1999;
80:
F142-F145 |
| 8. | EMEA. Note for guidance on clinical investigation of medicinal products in children. London: EMEA, 1997. |
| 9. | Bonati M. Epidemiological evaluation of drug use in children. J Clin Pharmacol 1994; 34: 300-305[Abstract]. |
| 10. | International Agranulocytosis and Aplastic Anemia Study. Risk of agranulocytosis and aplastic anemia. A first report of their relation to drug use with special reference to analgesics. JAMA 1986; 256: 1749-1757[Abstract]. |
| 11. | Turner S, Nunn AJ, Fielding K, Choonara I. Adverse drug reactions to unlicensed and off-label drugs on paediatric wards: a prospective study. Acta Paediatrica 1999; 88: 965-968[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 12. | Impicciatore P, Choonara I. Status of new medicines approved by the European Medicines Evaluation Agency regarding paediatric use. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1999; 48: 15-18[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 13. | Bonati M, Choonara I, Hoppu K, Pons G, Seyberth H. Closing the gap in drug therapy. Lancet 1999; 353: 1625[Medline]. |
(Accepted 1 November 1999)
Read all Rapid Responses