Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Jenny Firth-Cozens a See pp 1636, 1648Centre for Clinical
Psychology and Health Care Research, University of Northumbria at
Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7XA, b Sperrin Lakeland Health
and Social Care Trust, Erne Hospital, Enniskillen, Northern Ireland
Correspondence to: J Firth-Cozens
jenny.firth-cozens{at}unn.ac.uk
On 15 August 1998 a bomb exploded in the main street of
Omagh. It killed 29 people, including nine children, and injured over 300. The local hospital, Tyrone County Hospital, took most casualties into its very small accident and emergency department, and others were
sent to the Erne Hospital in Enniskillen, 40 miles away. A postal
questionnaire study of the health of all staff of Sperrin Lakeland
Health and Social Care Trust, which covers both hospitals, took place
four months later, and analyses are continuing. This paper presents
findings on the 41 doctors who replied in terms of their levels of
post-traumatic stress disorder.
All 115 doctors employed by the trust were sent questionnaires
that included a well validated measure of post-traumatic stress disorder,1 which requires particular symptoms to be
present and a total score above 6 as an indicator of the disorder.
Other questions concerned the doctors' involvement in the event, their prior experiences of serious trauma, and what help they had received since the bombing.
In total, 47 doctors returned questionnaires, with 41 (31 men, 10 women) giving sufficiently complete answers for analysis. Of these, 32 were involved in the bombing in a professional capacity, and one was
involved in a civilian capacity only. Eight of those involved
professionally had scores above threshold for a diagnosis of
post-traumatic stress disorder. Higher mean scores were found among
those working at Tyrone County Hospital (8.1) rather than at the Erne
Hospital (3.9). Junior doctors' mean scores (7.7) were higher than
senior doctors' (5.1), but this difference was not significant. The
highest mean scores were reported by those who had informed relatives
of a person's death (14.5) and those who felt responsible for the care
of an individual after death (12.0). The 19 doctors who had previously
experienced frightening trauma had significantly higher mean scores
than the 13 who had not (7.95 v 3.38, t=2.35, P<0.05). Of these, the six who had had previous
emotional disturbance linked to these earlier experiences had
significantly higher mean scores than those who had not (15.5 v 4.2, t=3.4, P<0.01).
Only half (16/32) of those involved professionally in the trauma sought
any kind of help afterwards, and, similarly, only half (4/8) of those
with scores indicating post-traumatic stress disorder had sought any help.
Estimates of post-traumatic stress disorders in health workers
after events such as this are rare. The numbers in this study are
small, but the warning for doctors is clear: a quarter of those
professionally helping the victims of the Omagh bombing had
post-traumatic stress disorder. Although this percentage has probably
declined over the past few months, disorder present at three months
after the trauma is seen as chronic.
Involvement with death was associated with the highest scores,
despite the fact that doctors usually report this to be a somewhat minor stressor.2 Doctors should be prepared for this
response in themselves if they are involved in major traumas,
particularly if they have previously experienced traumatic events.
Recognising post-traumatic stress disorder should be taught at medical
school, not just so that doctors can identify the disorder in patients but because some of them will suffer from it themselves, and it becomes
increasingly hard to treat the longer it has been
present.3 Despite the trust providing considerable help
for staff, half of those doctors with a clear diagnosis had not sought
or received any help for their condition, which is in line with
previous studies of doctors' help seeking for illness.4
In a review of post-traumatic stress disorder in emergency staff,
Bamber highlights the popular myth that professional helpers are
somehow immune from the same stresses as those they are
helping.5 They are perceived to be strong, resourceful,
and in control. Because of such perceptions, professionals may feel
unable to seek help when they need it, for fear of being seen as weak
or a failure. Consequently, they are at risk of developing more severe and entrenched symptoms.
![]()
Participants, methods, and results
Top
Participants, methods, and...
Comment
References
![]()
Comment
Top
Participants, methods, and...
Comment
References
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
Contributors: JF-C designed the study and wrote the paper. SJM conducted the analyses and literature search. CB arranged for the study to take place and contributed to the original questionnaire design. JF-C is guarantor for the study.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Funding: Sperrin Lakeland Health and Social Care Trust.
Competing interests: None declared.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Foa EB, Riggs DS, Danai CV, Rothbaum BO. Reliability and validity of a brief instrument for assessing post-traumatic stress disorder. J Traumatic Stress 1993; 6: 459-473. |
| 2. | Firth-Cozens J. Sources of stress in junior doctors and general practitioners. Yorkshire Med 1995; 7: 10-13. |
| 3. |
Freedman SA, Brandes D, Peri T, Shalev A.
Predictors of chronic post-traumatic stress disorder: A prospective study.
Br J Psychiatry
1999;
174:
353-359 |
| 4. |
Baldwin P, Dodd M, Wrate RM.
Young doctors' health II. Health and health behaviour.
Soc Sci Med
1997;
45:
41-44.
|
| 5. | Bamber M. Providing support for emergency service staff. Nurs Times 1994; 90(22): 32-33[Medline]. |
(Accepted 6 December 1999)