Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
EDITOR Instead of searching Medline they could have accessed the relevant data
more rapidly and directly by searching the Cochrane Library. This CD
Rom contains a suite of databases including the Cochrane Database of
Systematic Reviews A search of the Cochrane Library 1999 issue 2 using the single term
"sciatica" identifies two completed Cochrane reviews and six
protocols for systematic reviews. The review of surgery for lumbar disc
prolapse concludes that chemonucleosis is more effective than placebo
and that it is less invasive but also less effective than
discectomy.2 The DARE database has references to several other reviews, which come to similar conclusions. In addition there
were reviews of the effects and side effects of epidural steroids;
although supporting the general safety of this treatment, they are less
confident about its longer term benefits.3 There are also
105 trials identified in the controlled trials register, several
published in the past few years.
Increasingly we would recommend a more efficient strategy for
identifying systematic reviews and clinical trials which starts with a
search of the Cochrane Library and Best
Evidence4 and, since its recent launch,
Clinical Evidence.5 Only if this strategy does
not identify relevant and useful material is it worth investing the
considerable time that can be needed to carry out a search of Medline
and retrieve the relevant papers.
Samanta and Beardsley summarise their search for and use of
research evidence to inform their treatment of a patient with low back
pain due to sciatica that did not respond to conservative treatment.1 They are to be applauded for their explicit
and conscientious use of research, but we are surprised by their method of searching for relevant systematic reviews and trials.
systematic reviews carried out under the auspices
of the Cochrane Collaboration, abstracts of quality appraised
systematic reviews (DARE) prepared by the NHS Centre for Reviews and
Dissemination, and probably the world's largest register of controlled
clinical trials.
Department of Health Studies, University of York, York YO10
5DD tas5{at}york.ac.uk
Julie Glanville
NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York,
York YO10 5DD
| 1. |
Samanta A, Beardsley J.
Sciatica: which intervention?
BMJ
1999;
319:
302-303 |
| 2. | Gibson JNA, Grant IC, Waddell G. Surgery for lumbar disc prolapse. In: Cochrane Review. Cochrane Library. Issue 2. Oxford: Update Software, 1999. |
| 3. | Abram SE, O'Connor TC. Complications associated with epidural steroid injections. Regional Anesthesia 1996; 21: 149-162[Medline]. |
| 4. |
Glanville J, Haines M, Austin I.
Finding information on clinical effectiveness.
BMJ
1998;
317:
200-203 |
| 5. | Clinical evidence. London: BMJ Publishing, 1999. |
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+