Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
EDITOR In connection with this we are working within the Cochrane
Collaboration to ensure that the impact of any updating of a Cochrane review is more transparent when the revised version is published in the
Cochrane Library.2 It would be helpful if all systematic reviewers could ensure that they inform readers if their review has
been published elsewhere. This is already the case with Cochrane reviews, where details are given of other published versions within each review.
We would encourage anyone preparing guidelines for the reporting
of systematic reviews to urge that reviewers are explicit about the
existence of other versions. We have struggled for some time with the
problems caused by the multiple publication of randomised trials
without appropriate cross referencing3; as reviewers we
should ensure that we do not set the same traps for users of our research.
It would be helpful if journals could develop a mechanism by
which readers are made aware of updated versions of any research that
the journals have published. The advent of electronic forms of the
journals will facilitate this. It needs to be made much easier for
readers and users of medical research to identify the most up to date
description and findings of that research.
Erny and Maradit-Kremers (and the editor in his reply to
their letter) note some difficulties caused by the fact that Cochrane
reviews are not indexed in Medline.1 This has made it
difficult for people to identify these maintained systematic reviews
and to keep track of them. We agree that this is a problem for anyone
wishing to have access to up to date evidence of the effects of
different healthcare interventions. Fortunately, this is set to change
shortly as Cochrane reviews will soon be indexed in Medline. In
addition, whenever a Cochrane review is updated substantively a record
for the new version will be added to Medline with a reference to the
earlier record.
UK Cochrane Centre, Oxford OX2 7LG mclarke{at}cochrane.co.uk
Andy Oxman
Health Services Research Unit, National Institute of Public
Health, Postboks 4404 Torshov, Oslo N-0403, Norway
| 1. |
Erny S, Maradit-Kremers H.
What is publication?
BMJ
1999;
319:
317-318 |
| 2. | Clarke M, Oxman AD, eds. Cochrane reviewers' handbook 4.0 [updated July 1999]. In: Review manager (RevMan) [Computer program], version 4.0. Oxford: Cochrane Collaboration, 1999. |
| 3. | Gotzsche P. Multiple publication of reports of drug trials. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1989; 36: 429-432[Medline]. |
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+