Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
We still know too little about what will ease babies' pain
Parents know that babies cry because they are either
in pain or distressed. They also know that babies cry to attract their attention so that they can comfort them. Pain is a subjective experience so one cannot prove that a newborn baby is in pain. One can,
however, confirm that the baby is exhibiting signs of distress,
probably caused by a painful procedure (such as venepuncture). Parents
know that a crying baby needs comforting and will hold the infant
close. Breast feeding mothers will give their infants the opportunity
to breast feed, even if they are not hungry.
The study by Carbajal et al in this week's issue confirms that these
actions of mothers are appropriate (p 1393).1 This is
important not because parents are likely to change their behaviour but
because it will encourage health professionals to modify their behaviour when caring for newborn infants. Observational studies have
shown that many procedures carried out on newborn infants in hospital
are likely to result in pain.2 More invasive procedures, including surgical interventions, are likely to result in significant pain and distress. The use of interventions, be they pacifiers, sucrose
solutions, cuddling, or analgesia, needs to be evidence based. This
requires well designed clinical trials using validated pain assessment tools.
The classic observational analysis of an infant in pain was
reported by Charles Darwin in 1872. His description of an infant in
pain forms the basis of many of today's pain assessment scales: "Infants, when suffering even slight pain or discomfort, utter violent and prolonged screams ... their eyes are
firmly closed, so that the skin round them is wrinkled, and the
forehead contracted into a frown. The mouth is widely opened with the
lips retracted in a peculiar manner, which causes it to assume a
squarish form."3 It has taken health professionals 100 years to develop these observations of facial expression and crying,
alongside observations of sleep-arousal state and tone-posture-motor
activity, into objective pain assessment tools and distress scales for
the newborn infant. Such a validated scale was used by Carbajal et al
to determine that non-nutritive sucking on a pacifer provided a better
analgesic effect during venepuncture than the use of solutions of
glucose or sucrose.
Most neonatal pain assessment tools have been developed for use in full
term infants.4 Few have been developed for premature infants, who may show different responses.5 Yet it is
preterm infants who are most likely to experience the greatest number of invasive procedures. Also the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of analgesic agents in premature infants are often different from those
in full term infants.
6 7
Clinical trials are needed to determine which interventions are
appropriate after different procedures. Randomised controlled trials
have shown the value of both topical and local anaesthesia in infants
undergoing circumcision.
8 9
Similarly, venepuncture has been shown to be more effective and less painful than the use of a
lancet (for heel pricks) in newborn infants.
10 11
Health
professionals involved in the care of the newborn infant have the
responsibility to try to ensure changes in clinical practice on the
basis of published clinical trials. We cannot avoid all painful
procedures in the newborn but we can minimise the pain and distress
after such procedures.
Unfortunately there have been few studies on the dose response to
analgesic agents such as morphine and paracetamol in relation to
postoperative pain in newborn infants (either full term or preterm).
There will always be interindividual variation among babies to a
standardised painful procedure. We still, however, do not know what
dose of morphine will provide sufficient analgesia after major surgery
in most newborn infants. The challenge in the next decade is to answer
questions like this, alongside the dose and place of mild analgesic
agents such as paracetamol and the value of pacifiers in the newborn infant.
University of Nottingham, Derbyshire Children's
Hospital, Derby DE22 3NE
IC has research grants from Astra and Chiroscience in the management of pain in children.
| 1. |
Carbajal R, Chauvet X, Couderc S, Olivier-Martin M.
Randomised trial of analgesic effects of sucrose, glucose, and pacifiers in term neonates.
BMJ
1999;
319:
1393-1397 |
| 2. | Barker DP, Rutter N. Exposure to invasive procedures in neonatal intensive care unit admissions. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1995; 72: F47-F48[Abstract]. |
| 3. | Darwin CR. The expression of the emotions in man and animals. 3rd ed. London: Fontana, 1999. |
| 4. | Choonara I. Pain in neonates, assessment and management. Semin Neonatol 1998; 3: 137-142. |
| 5. | Stevens B, Johnston C, Petryshen P, Taddio A. Premature infant pain profile: development and initial validation. Clin J Pain 1996; 12: 13-22[Medline]. |
| 6. | Barker DP, Rutter N. Lignocaine ointment and local anaesthesia in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1995; 72: F203-F204[Abstract]. |
| 7. | Bhat R, Abu-Harb M, Chari G, Gulati A. Morphine metabolism in acutely ill preterm newborn infants. J Pediatr 1992; 120: 795-799[Medline]. |
| 8. | Stang HJ, Gunnar MR, Snellman L, Condon LM, Kestenbaum R. Local anaesthesia for neonatal circumcision. Effects on distress and cortisol response. JAMA 1988; 259: 1507-1511[Abstract]. |
| 9. | Benini F, Johnston CC, Faucher D, Aranda JV. Topical anesthesia during circumcision in newborn infants. JAMA 1993; 270: 850-853[Abstract]. |
| 10. | Shah VS, Taddio A, Bennett S, Speidel BD. Neonatal pain response to heel stick vs venepuncture for routine blood sampling. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1997; 74: F143-F144. |
| 11. |
Larsson BA, Tannfeldt G, Lagercrantz H, Olsson GL.
Venipuncture is more effective and less painful than heel lancing for blood tests in neonates.
Pediatrics
1998;
101:
882-886 |
Read all Rapid Responses
Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.