Eccentric conformist Carl Gray analyses diversity in medical style
Medical teachers are understandably concerned to equip their
students with the necessary skills, attitudes, and knowledge for work
in the profession. There used to be traditional assumptions of style in
appearance, clothing, and manners. This was exemplified by Trevor
Howard"s character in Brief Encounter: a well-scrubbed doctor in
fustian gents" outfitting with mild manners and understated passion.
Teachers at medical school said, `Look smart, get your hair cut, and
keep your finger nails short: the patients, especially elderly
patients, want their doctors, and therefore you students, to look like
doctors." The message was a little spoilt by their embroidered Afghan
goatskin coat and flares, but we listened in kindly disbelief.
Conventional manners and style were part of civilisation, part of the
contract between strangers that enabled them to interact with
predictable success.
Alas, the world has changed, and the question of style v quality
has returned with a vengeance. British reserve is increasingly replaced
by transatlantic style, pan-European chic, or Australasian informality.
The world is asking for accountable standards of performance from
doctors. How far should professionalism determine style and conformity
in a medical career? Can medical eccentrics survive the new quality environment?
 |
Diversity |
Doctors are as delightfully varied as humankind. We can all bring
to mind the traditional medical stereotypes: bombastic surgeons, sinister physicians, jolly general practitioners, baffled pathologists, and the rest. And we know that in most cases such types are false. In
our evidence base of acquaintances, we can perhaps find contrary examples of baffled surgeons, jolly physicians, sinister general practitioners, and bombastic pathologists. Real doctors differ from
typecasting by miles, and if you compute the infinite parameters of
individuality you rapidly become the unique example of your kind of
doctor, and number one in your class.
Medical students are amazed by discordance between appearances and
reality. Hippies of the 1970s have become professors of surgery,
Gilbert and George lookalikes have turned into trendy psychiatrists,
and medical directors everywhere can have beards, pony tails, sandals,
and short skirts (and that"s just the men).Despite the initially
normative valve of medical education, doctors will naturally diverge
thereafter along their individual career paths: into hospital or
general practice, into different specialties, into rapid or postponed
success, into international travel, into family commitments, into
programmatic life satisfaction or mere medical existence. Individual
peculiarities flourish in medicine, where most doctors are their own
boss and, up to a point, have been able to run their lives as they wish.
 |
Conformity |
Teenagers converge towards the norm; it"s just that their
parents do not like the normal teenager. Nowadays, doctors also are
having to converge into conformity, but under the influence of external
forces. There soon will be guidelines for everything, and a substantial
degree of standardisation is inevitable in all parts of practice. We
may not like it, but nice men and women in suits will say what we
should do and cute chimps in police helmets will check that we are
doing it. Comfortable conformity removes exploration and innovation.
Conformity is comfortable for those who make rules, enforce rules, and
accept rules, but not, alas, for eccentrics.
 |
Eccentricity |
Eccentricity is part of the British way of life. Whether you look
odd, act odd, or really are odd, you will fit in somewhere. We enjoy
diversity and combine it with tolerance and ridicule, but we don"t
mind at all. Mild eccentricity is the basis of much loved situation
comedies. Mavericks, non-conformists, and the person who disagrees
(there is always at least one) are secretly valued. The late Screaming
Lord Such and his Monster Raving Loony Party were much admired
not
much voted for
but admired and necessary.
Eccentricity varies by degrees: you are eccentric, she is bizarre,
I am creative. One person"s weirdness is another"s weekend hobby or
even way of life. There are differences between being eccentric and
acting eccentrically: showing lack of insight or consciously
cultivating behaviour. The real eccentric thinks he"s normal; he is
blind to the rules and is naively surprised at the response he
engenders everywhere. The normal reference ranges for humans are indeed
very wide. Humans are also subject to peer group pressure and fashion.
Most succumb to some extent.In British professional life we have had
the unspoken doctrine of maximum permissible oddity: that one major
oddity, or two minor oddities, as long as everything else is
conventional, is still OK. Selection boards in the armed forces,
professions, and civil service have long struggled to deal with the
slightly odd chap. Pragmatically, the chap might be permitted a major
oddity or two minor oddities so long as everything else was
reassuringly conventional. The definitions of oddity have varied
through the ages: at one time having a beard or being a female chap, a
gay chap, or a foreign chap were major oddities, while wearing bow
ties, being drunk, keeping newts, playing the accordion or guitar,
ladies wearing trousers, and anyone discussing religion, money, sex,
culture, or football were minor oddities. Alas, standards have slipped: these days bearded ladies in trousers discuss whether the football culture is the sexy new religion all over the place.Modern oddities might include smoking a pipe, editing a periodical, studying chafing in
cyclists, and not enjoying football. Happily, the increase in cultural
diversity in Britain has led to a massive broadening of minds in recent
years. Unhappily, racial and sex discrimination may not yet be
completely extinct. Dislike of eccentricity is closely related to
larger scale xenophobia. Slightly odd chaps everywhere are still wise
to cultivate reassuring normality so far as they can manage. Different
settings encourage conformity and diversity (see box), and in a working
day doctors may fluctuate between convention and eccentricity.
 |
Pros and cons of being odd |
The value of diversity
including its extreme form,
eccentricity
lies in creativity, adaptability, and the bypassing of
the limits of convention. Innovation springs from dissatisfied minds and strives in new directions. Many currently accepted views were once
unorthodox, until they were challenged, tried, and finally adopted. The
people who ask "Why?" are those who find the answer.
The downside of eccentricity is its potential to cover mediocrity
and non-cooperation. Flamboyant weirdness is captivating but also
confusing. How is this person performing behind his or her persiflage
or camouflage? Strip off the make-up, the mannerisms, the body piercing
devices, and the affected Viennese politesse and what is left: anything
or nothing? If this is self expression then what is being expressed? Is
the chap under the cowboy hat or the girl in the fishnet tights any
bloody good? Are mere stylistic choices inappropriately obstructing function?
 |
Professionalism |
Professionalism means delivering the same service to the patient
whoever you are and however you are feeling or looking today. A
paediatrician in a clown costume or one in a white coat should be
delivering the same paediatrics to the sick child. One should still
wake up whether the anaesthetist looks funny or merely peculiar, whether he has come in through the door or the window. A doctor who
cultivates Jane Austen mannerisms or who, like Black Adder"s King
George, says "penguin" at the end of every sentence should be just
as alert to drug interactions or the subtle downward trend in vital
signs in the acutely ill.
 |
Acting the doctor |
We know how doctors should look and act; we"ve seen them in
films and even some examples on the wards. But medicine is changing, and diverse professional personalities are adapting in different ways.
Some retreat into traditionalism and conservatism
indeed, all those
young fogeys at medical school now turn out to be perfectly equipped
country general practitioners. Others leap into the new ways and
language and the fashionable thing, whatever it is this week. Many are
wondering, `Am I good enough for these challenges?" Which would you
rather be: the mountebank or his zany? Trainee doctors must flourish in
their chosen styles: it does not matter how you look or seem, it"s
what you can do that will be evaluated. The patients must understand
and value their doctors. Open communication must mean what it says. The
days of coded messages, secret societies, and closed conventions are
over. What is understood to be understood may be misleading. Spit it
out, man!
The answer surely lies in cultivating diversity and doing our own
thing while identifying the essentials of good practice and
communication and ruthlessly proving we can do them. Confusions between
quality, message, and style will continue until quality standards are
more fully assessed. This is the direction the profession is taking.
Under the new rules, doctors will be legislators, enforcers, conformists, or eccentrics. Politicians will set the aims on behalf of
society. Clever doctors will set the rules. Enforcers will implement
them gleefully. Conformists will follow them, grumbling. And eccentrics
will set about ignoring them, breaking them, or looking odd. But they
might at least wonder "Why?"This is the new medicine. Why not ask
your consultants or colleagues for permission to change your style, or
theirs? You"re looking stylish today, Doctor, but how will you fit
in?
|
Locating conformity and diversity
Settings that deserve conformity
- Interprofessional liaison
Settings which encourage diversity
- Learned societies and associations
|
|
|
Table: Medical types in relation to new rules |
|
|
Original Thinking |
No original thinking |
| In authority |
Legislators |
Enforcers |
| Subject to authority |
Eccentrics |
Conformists |
|