BMJ 1999;319:0 ( 13 November )

Editorial

New technologies in medicine and medical journals

ABI BERGER, SCIENCE EDITOR

BMJ

RICHARD SMITH, EDITOR

BMJ

For most of medicine the future is highly uncertain

Edwina Clark, a 42 year old woman with diabetes, no longer needs to test her blood sugar concentrations every day because she now has a glucose sensor implanted under the skin of her thigh. Her toilet at home provides a double check because it can analyse glucose, protein, and bacteria concentrations in her urine. Instead of giving herself daily injections of insulin, she now relies on an implanted insulin reservoir that automatically adjusts her insulin dose. Her blood sugar concentrations are so well controlled that she is unlikely ever to develop any of the vascular and neurological complications that used to be common.

The futuristic technology Edwina is using is almost here. Exciting advances and new technologies are appearing every day. We already have computer systems that make diagnoses, and telemedicine is beginning to challenge the need for hospitals. Patients are visiting the internet for many of their health needs. Future family doctors will provide expert guidance to patients who are better educated about their condition than their doctors. Some doctors have experienced this already--and enjoyed it. And once science enables us to know our own genome, we will be able to anticipate future health problems, change any risk taking behaviour, and have personalised treatments designed for us.

In this unusual issue of the BMJ, which shares its theme with many other journals including JAMA, we are not only looking towards this rosy future, but also trying to figure out which route to take. We examine a number of new technologies and promising scientific advances, but we have set them in the context of a world which is having to make harsh choices about what should be made available and to whom. Whether Edwina gets her implantable devices will depend both on financial resources and inequities in access that are already being faced.

In the shorter term we must question whether the presumed benefits of new technologies, invention, and discovery outweigh the costs. Sometimes more harm than good may occur. For example, Edwina may in future learn that she carries a gene for another disease that remains untreatable. She may also discover that implantable devices are only available to the rich or that they cause some unexpected harm. New information and options spawn new responsibilities.

For most of medicine the future is highly uncertain. Most diseases have multiple causes, and treatment decisions will have to be made through sophisticated risk analysis. So, while new technologies are exciting, better scientific understanding and limited resources are likely to make the decisions that Edwina and her doctors face not less but more difficult.

The future of medical journals is still more uncertain. Medical journals that comprise mostly research articles (most of them) are almost certain to disappear. Instead research studies will be published on a huge electronic database. The primary job of the surviving journals will not be to publish research studies but rather to visit the database, scavenge the studies that are important for clinicians (a small minority), and present them in as sexy and appealing a form as they can manage.

We have made an attempt with this theme issue to create the medical journal of the future. (Don't worry if you hate it: normal service will be resumed next week.) The paper version of the journal will present information in a condensed and attractive form as a trailer for the electronic version, which will be multimedia and rich in links to other information sources. Knowledge will come not in distinct chunks (an issue of a journal) but rather as part of a rich web that will cater simultaneously both for those who want a bite and those who want a full banquet. Thus this week's paper journal consists of many short and, we hope, readable, articles: long versions of each of these appear on our website (see the URL on each page for the specific address), together with more illustrations and several video clips.

Don't be scared of the future. Sit back and enjoy it with this recyclable BMJ.


Also on the BMJ's website this week is a questionnaire on our ELPS (electronic long-paper short) experiment for research articles. We've produced several different types of "short" articles and we'd like to know which you prefer and why.



© BMJ 1999

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

The BMJ should use technology appropriately
Derek Roskell
bmj.com, 12 Nov 1999 [Full text]
Congratulations!
Eduardo Sancho
bmj.com, 12 Nov 1999 [Full text]
Re: Comment on new technologies issue
Judith C Simpson
bmj.com, 12 Nov 1999 [Full text]
BMJ? I thought it was Wired
Christopher Hart
bmj.com, 12 Nov 1999 [Full text]
Videogames and medicine
Mark Griffiths
bmj.com, 12 Nov 1999 [Full text]
No! No! No! - I want to be allowed to read
Chris Bennett
bmj.com, 12 Nov 1999 [Full text]
Comment on new technologies issue
D G Tweedie
bmj.com, 12 Nov 1999 [Full text]
Have I been asleep, is it the first of April?
A M Cave
bmj.com, 12 Nov 1999 [Full text]
A journal not a tabloid
David Inwald
bmj.com, 12 Nov 1999 [Full text]
Someone should be sacked
Theo Fenton
bmj.com, 12 Nov 1999 [Full text]
Dumbing Down
Jane Smithson
bmj.com, 12 Nov 1999 [Full text]
Gawd ELPS us?
Andrew Morrice
bmj.com, 14 Nov 1999 [Full text]
It''s tough to change
Marc A Swerdloff
bmj.com, 14 Nov 1999 [Full text]
Journalistic coverage should be left to the lay media
Gunther Eysenbach
bmj.com, 14 Nov 1999 [Full text]
I thought it was crap
Andrew Hobart
bmj.com, 14 Nov 1999 [Full text]
Whoops. Another banana skin!
Keith J Russell
bmj.com, 14 Nov 1999 [Full text]
design disaster
Steurer Johann
bmj.com, 15 Nov 1999 [Full text]
Techno toys looking for a purpose
Peter Herbert
bmj.com, 15 Nov 1999 [Full text]
Support from the future
Andrei Morgan
bmj.com, 15 Nov 1999 [Full text]
Dire
Paul Silcocks
bmj.com, 15 Nov 1999 [Full text]
Dire II
David Fitzmaurice
bmj.com, 15 Nov 1999 [Full text]
Dreadful
Jeffrey C McILwain
bmj.com, 16 Nov 1999 [Full text]
Disastrous
Margaret Elmes
bmj.com, 16 Nov 1999 [Full text]
Unreadable
B Meiklejohn
bmj.com, 16 Nov 1999 [Full text]
Well done!
John Pilling
bmj.com, 16 Nov 1999 [Full text]
Ghastly to touch
Robert Allison
bmj.com, 16 Nov 1999 [Full text]
Future Burnout
Thomas Brunoski
bmj.com, 16 Nov 1999 [Full text]
Not worth keeping
M Feldman
bmj.com, 16 Nov 1999 [Full text]
Snappy but sometimes difficult to read
Steve Lazar
bmj.com, 16 Nov 1999 [Full text]
Don''t change!
Elaine Ruthven
bmj.com, 16 Nov 1999 [Full text]
Electronic fine, paper appalling
Rosemary Jones
bmj.com, 16 Nov 1999 [Full text]
Let''s slow down a bit
Jonathan M Glass
bmj.com, 16 Nov 1999 [Full text]
Comments
J J O Donnell
bmj.com, 16 Nov 1999 [Full text]
Snoozing with the journal may not inform you!
Susan Lightman
bmj.com, 16 Nov 1999 [Full text]
Change of presentation and style
D W Ryan
bmj.com, 18 Nov 1999 [Full text]
Response to 13 November journal
Tim Finnegan
bmj.com, 18 Nov 1999 [Full text]
At least it's recyclable.
Melanie Wynne-Jones
bmj.com, 19 Nov 1999 [Full text]
Stick to print on white paper
John Buckels
bmj.com, 20 Nov 1999 [Full text]
Amnesia
Rupert Gude
bmj.com, 22 Nov 1999 [Full text]
Yes!Yes!Yes!
Terence Tilney, et al.
bmj.com, 22 Nov 1999 [Full text]
More feedback
W Clayton
bmj.com, 21 Nov 1999 [Full text]
November
James A S Dickson
bmj.com, 22 Nov 1999 [Full text]
Medicine - the future
Munir Ali-Zubair
bmj.com, 25 Nov 1999 [Full text]
lay B.M.J?
Peter Davies
bmj.com, 26 Nov 1999 [Full text]
Disappointed
Jacqui Bussin
bmj.com, 26 Nov 1999 [Full text]
Its exciting and more challenging.
Richard Ripley
bmj.com, 30 Dec 1999 [Full text]
Fulfilling the vision of the future - today
Jane A Root
bmj.com, 4 Feb 2000 [Full text]



Student BMJ

Risk of surgery for inflammatory bowel disease: record linkage studies

What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+

www.student.bmj.com

Listen to the latest BMJ Interview