Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Andrew Vickers
Osteopathy and chiropractic share
a common origin. Their roots can be found in folk traditions of "bone
setting," and both were systematised in the late 19th century in the
United States: Daniel D Palmer, the founder of chiropractic, is said to
have met with Andrew Taylor Still, the founder of osteopathy, before setting up his own school. The therapies remain relatively similar, and
many textbooks and journals are relevant to both. The term "manipulative therapy" refers to both osteopathy and chiropractic.
Osteopathy and chiropractic are therapies of the
musculoskeletal system: practitioners work with bones, muscles, and
connective tissue, using their hands to diagnose and treat
abnormalities of structure and function.

View larger version (68K):
[in a new window]
High velocity thrust delivered by a levered thrust, the
technique usually used by osteopaths
![]()
Background
Top
Background
What happens during a...
Therapeutic scope
Safety of osteopathy and...
Practitioners

View larger version (64K):
[in a new window]
High velocity thrust given as a direct thrust on the spine, as
favoured by chiropractors
The best known technique is the "high velocity thrust," a short, sharp motion usually applied to the spine. This manoeuvre is designed to release structures with a restricted range of movement. High velocity thrusts often produce the sound of joint "cracking," which is associated with manipulative therapy. There are various methods of delivering a high velocity thrust. Chiropractors are more likely to push on vertebrae with their hands, whereas osteopaths tend use the limbs to make levered thrusts. That said, osteopathic and chiropractic techniques are converging, and much of their therapeutic repertoire is shared.
Practitioners also use a range of soft tissue techniques that do not involve high velocity thrusts. For example, the "muscle energy techniques" (known as "proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation" by physiotherapists) make use of post-isometric relaxation to increase restricted ranges of movement.
|
Osteopaths and chiropractors may also use what are termed "functional techniques," such as treating hip pain by applying a gentle, prolonged pull to the leg while slowly rotating it in the hip joint. If a restriction is detected, however slight, the leg is held at the point of restriction until a release of muscle tension occurs. Techniques like these are based on an understanding of subtle neuromuscular behaviour, which conforms to mainstream theory. In practice, they also rely on finely developed palpatory skills.
Some osteopaths also practise a technique known as cranial osteopathy or craniosacral therapy. Practitioners place their hands on the cranium and sacrum and gently handle the bones of the skull. They say that, by feeling for and working with subtle rhythmic pulsations of the cerebrospinal fluid, they can correct disturbances in the neuromuscular system. There are some therapists, usually known as craniosacral therapists, who use similar techniques but who do not have an osteopathic background.
A relatively recent branch of chiropractic, the McTimoney school, has developed some of its own manipulative techniques that do not place as great an emphasis on high velocity thrusts as do osteopathy and mainstream chiropractic.
With the exception of cranial osteopathy, many of the treatment methods used by osteopaths and chiropractors are similar to techniques used by those physiotherapists with additional training in manipulative therapy. From a general practitioner's perspective, there are few important practical differences between the three types of practitioner.
|
| |
What happens during a treatment? |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Manipulative therapists take a history, palpate for significant changes in muscle tension and skin circulation, and look for any restricted movements in order to diagnose musculoskeletal abnormalities and "neuromuscular dysfunction" (such as "trigger points" or signs of "pain-spasm cycles"). Chiropractors may use x rays to assist diagnosis, whereas osteopaths do so largely only for the purposes of excluding serious pathology.
A typical treatment session lasts 15-30 minutes, although
first consultations may take longer. A variety of the techniques described above will be used. Not more than four high velocity thrusts
are usually given in a single treatment session. A course of
chiropractic treatment for back pain might consist of six sessions, initially frequent and then at weekly intervals. Osteopaths are more
likely than chiropractors to treat on an "as needed" basis.
| |
Therapeutic scope |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Both osteopathy and chiropractic were originally regarded as complete systems of medicine. For example, Andrew Taylor Still treated infectious diseases and blindness among a range of conditions. Interestingly, the treatment of back problems features only rarely in his writings. Similarly, early chiropractors believed that most diseases could be attributed to misalignments of the spine and were therefore amenable to treatment with chiropractic.
|
Contemporary practitioners have moved away from this position and concentrate primarily on musculoskeletal disorders. Low back pain is the most common presenting complaint. Guidelines from the Royal College of General Practitioners recommend physical therapy (any of the manipulative techniques) within six weeks of the start of persisting uncomplicated back pain.
|
Key studies of efficacy
Systematic reviews
Randomised controlled trials
|
Other conditions often seen include neck and shoulder pain, sports injuries, repetitive strain disorders, and headache. Practitioners also treat various conditions such as arthritis; although they cannot affect disease pathology or progression, they claim to be able to treat secondary symptoms such as pain from associated muscle spasm. Cranial osteopathy has a particular reputation for treating children with conditions such as infantile colic, constant crying, and behavioural problems.
Research evidence
There is considerable evidence from randomised controlled
trials of the effectiveness of spinal manipulation for back and neck
pain. Although this evidence is largely positive, it has been
criticised for failing to exclude non-specific effects of treatment.
|
| |
Safety of osteopathy and chiropractic |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The most important potential adverse effects of osteopathy and chiropractic are stroke and spinal cord injury after cervical manipulation. Estimates of such severe adverse events vary widely, ranging from 1 in 20 000 patients undergoing cervical manipulation to 1 per million procedures. In recent years the osteopathic and chiropractic professions have shown greater appreciation of the risks of cervical manipulation, and it is possible that improved practice is leading to a reduction in the rate of severe complications.
|
Contraindications to high velocity thrusts
Based on the Mercy guidelines from the proceedings of the Mercy Center Consensus Conference, Burlingham CA, USA, 1992 |
More common adverse effects (25-50% of all patients) are mild
pain or discomfort at the site of manipulation, slight headache, and
fatigue; 75% or more of such complaints resolve within 24 hours.
Contraindications to various manipulative techniques have been
developed by the appropriate professional bodies, and practitioners are
trained to screen patients and assess individual risk factors. Even
when some techniques, such as high velocity thrusts, are contraindicated, other manipulative treatments may be safe.
| |
Practitioners |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Osteopathy and chiropractic are almost exclusively based in the community and in the private sector. Many practitioners work alone, often from converted rooms in their own homes. Others work in group clinics, in multidisciplinary practices, or in general practices. Some independent manipulative practitioners have established contracts with health authorities, fundholding practices, or primary care groups. Most private health insurance schemes now offer some cover for manipulative treatment.
|
Regulatory bodies and sources of further information
General Osteopathic Council
General Chiropractic Council
Manipulative Association of Chartered Physiotherapists
|
Regulation
Osteopathy and chiropractic are the only two complementary
therapies that are regulated by statute. Two acts of parliament passed
in the mid-1990s established a General Osteopathic Council and a
General Chiropractic Council with the aim of regulating the professions
by the millennium. These organisations operate in a similar way to the
General Medical Council and have the authority to remove practitioners
from the register in disciplinary hearings.
Training
Most osteopaths take a four year, full time course leading to a
BSc degree (BOst). Chiropractors undertake a four to five year, full
time training, which includes a BSc in human sciences and chiropractic
and a year of postgraduate training in an approved practice, leading to
a diploma in chiropractic (DC). McTimoney and McTimoney Corley
practitioners complete a four year, part time course. Biological and
clinical sciences form a substantial component
of all these training courses. Sometimes chiropractors are referred to
as "doctors of chiropractic." This is purely a courtesy title and
has been used since chiropractic began.
|
Further reading
|
|
Educational organisations for doctors
British Institute of Musculoskeletal Medicine
Society of Orthopaedic Medicine
London College of Osteopathic Medicine
|
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
The pictures of manipulative techniques and of cranial osteopathy are reproduced with permission of BMJ/Ulrike Preuss. The picture of a physiotherapist is reproduced with permission of Science Photo Library.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
The ABC of complementary medicine is edited and written by Catherine Zollman and Andrew Vickers. Catherine Zollman is a general practitioner in Bristol, and Andrew Vickers will shortly take up a post at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York. At the time of writing, both worked for the Research Council for Complementary Medicine, London. The series will be published as a book in Spring 2000.
Read all Rapid Responses
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+