Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
John J Reilly a University of Glasgow Department of Human
Nutrition, Yorkhill Hospitals, Glasgow G3 8SJ, b ALSPAC Study Team, Unit of Paediatric and Perinatal
Epidemiology, Institute of Child Health, University of Bristol, Bristol
BS8 1TH
Correspondence to: Dr Reilly
jjr2y{at}clinmed.gla.ac.uk
Estimates of the prevalence of obesity among children are
necessary so that the need for preventive measures can be assessed, secular trends monitored, and high risk population groups
identified.1 The aim of this study was therefore to
provide current estimates of the prevalence of obesity among British children.
Subjects consisted of a birth cohort randomly selected
from a larger geographically defined total population cohort born in the Bristol-Avon area in 1991-2. The cohort has been described elsewhere2 and is broadly representative of children in
the United Kingdom. Height (to 0.1 cm, measured with a Leicester height meter) and weight in underwear (to 0.1 kg, measured with Seca scales)
were measured in children at 24, 49, and 61 months of age.
There is a consensus that childhood obesity should be defined by using
the body mass index (weight (kg)/(height
(m))2),
1 3
a simple proxy for body
fatness that is interpreted relative to population reference
data.
1 3 4
The following recommended cut
offs3 were applied to United Kingdom reference data4: a standard deviation score >1.04 for body mass
index (above the 85th centile) was defined as overweight, and a
standard deviation score >1.64 (above the 95th centile) was defined as obese. These definitions set the percentage of children expected to be
overweight (15%) and obese (5%) and "fix" these expected frequencies at the time of the United Kingdom 1990 reference
data.
1 4
The cut off used to define obesity is not
arbitrary: children with a body mass index above the 95th centile are
likely to be excessively fat,
3 5
and obesity defined in
this way has a strong likelihood of persisting to adulthood and is
associated with several adverse health outcomes.3
The table shows data on the prevalence of overweight and
obesity. Differences in prevalence between boys and girls were not significant. The prevalence of obesity significantly exceeded expected
frequencies at 49 and 61 months (
This study showed an excess of overweight and obesity in
children before the age of school entry. These data are consistent with
evidence of an epidemic of adult obesity and support the view that
efforts to prevent obesity should begin in early childhood.
Updating growth charts to allow for secular trends would obscure such
trends and so the prevalence of obesity should be expressed relative to
contemporary reference data at a fixed point in time.1 We
used contemporary United Kingdom reference data in this
way.4 Given the rise in the prevalence of obesity and
overweight since these were compiled, monitoring of secular trends in
childhood obesity is indicated. Trends in prevalence might be obscured, however, if only body mass index is monitored because changes in this
index cannot be readily separated into changes in fat mass and fat free
mass (body mass index is a proxy for both).3-5 Secular
trends would be more easily identified by monitoring other variables
such as skinfold thickness or body fat percentage.5
The definitions of overweight and obesity used in this study are based
on a simple proxy for body fatness-body mass index-rather than direct
measurements of body fatness. As a proxy, body mass index is highly
specific for obesity
3 5
(it identifies few non-obese
children as obese) but insensitive5 (it fails to identify
relatively large numbers of obese children). Since our definition of
obesity is conservative, the true prevalence of childhood obesity in
the United Kingdom will be higher than the estimates generated in this study.
![]()
Subjects, methods, and results
Top
Subjects, methods, and results
Comment
References
2
goodness of fit tests).
![]()
Comment
Top
Subjects, methods, and results
Comment
References
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank Dr Jan Love of the Robertson Centre for Biostatistics for statistical advice and are grateful to all the parents and children for their cooperation. The ALSPAC (Avon longitudinal study of pregnancy and childhood) study team consists of interviewers, technicians, clerical workers, scientists, volunteers, and managers: we are grateful for their help and advice.
Contributors: JJR initiated core ideas; supervised ARD; participated in data analysis, data interpretation, and writing of the paper; and is guarantor. ARD discussed core ideas, carried out data analysis, and participated in data interpretation and writing of the paper. PME discussed core ideas; was involved in training staff and quality control of data collected; and participated in data analysis, interpretation, and writing of the paper.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Funding: The ALSPAC study was supported by various groups, including the Wellcome Trust, Department of Health, and Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. ARD was sponsored by the Iranian Ministry of Health and Medical Education.
Competing interests: None declared.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Prentice AM.
Body mass index standards for children.
BMJ
1998;
317:
1401-1402 |
| 2. | ALSPAC. Children of the nineties. http://alspac2.ich.bris.ac.uk/alspacext/Default.html (accessed 30 Sep 1998). |
| 3. |
Barlow SE, Dietz WH.
Obesity evaluation and treatment: expert committee recommendations.
Pediatrics
1998;
102:
e29 |
| 4. |
Cole TJ, Freeman JV, Preece MA.
Body mass index reference curves for the UK, 1990.
Arch Dis Child
1995;
73:
25-29 |
| 5. | Reilly JJ, Savage SAH, Ruxton CHS, Kirk TR. Assessment of obesity in a community sample of prepubertal children. Int J Obes 1999; 23: 217-219. |
(Accepted 29 July)
Read all Rapid Responses