Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
how to do it
Aarne Lahdensuo Department of Pulmonary
Diseases, Tampere University Hospital, 36280 Pikonlinna, Finland
aarne.lahdensuo{at}tays.fi
Almost 75% of admissions for asthma are avoidable,
and potentially preventable factors are common in deaths from
asthma.
1 2
At least 40% of people with asthma do not
react appropriately when their symptoms worsen, and over 50% of
patients admitted with acute asthma have had alarming symptoms for at
least a week before admission.
3 4
As many as 60% of
asthmatic patients are poor at judging their dyspnoea.5
Self management of asthma involves the patient making therapeutic,
behavioural, and environmental adjustments in accordance with advice
from healthcare professionals.6 Guided self management of
asthma is a treatment strategy in which patients are taught to act
appropriately when the first signs of asthma exacerbations appear.
In a recent Cochrane review, self management of asthma in
adults was compared with usual care in 22 studies.7 Self
management education reduced hospital admissions (odds ratio 0.57, 95%
confidence interval 0.38 to 0.88), emergency room visits (0.71, 0.57 to
0.90), unscheduled visits to the doctor (0.57, 0.40 to 0.82), days off work or off school (0.55, 0.38 to 0.79), and nocturnal asthma (0.53, 0.39 to 0.72). Self management programmes that contained a written
action plan showing patients how to act in early exacerbations showed a
greater reduction in admissions to hospital than did programmes without
a plan (0.35, 0.18 to 0.68).
Box 1
: Reasons for self management of asthma
![]()
Introduction
Top
Introduction
Methods
Setting up a self...
References
Cost effectiveness studies of self management programmes for asthma have shown positive results, with cost benefit ratios between 1:2.5 and 1:11.228; the programme with the most favourable result saved $11.22 (£7) for every $1 (£1.60) spent.
|
Summary points
|
| |
Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article is based largely on my experience as a pulmonary
specialist, in charge of organising asthma treatment in my hospital district, and on studies of self management of asthma. I have also
included the views of several national and international working groups
in which I have participated, and I have supplemented reviews and
articles from high quality journals.
| |
Setting up a self management programme for asthma |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although the reasons for starting a self management programme for asthma are obvious (box 1), it is not always an easy task to start this kind of programme. Giving asthmatic patients more responsibility and independence may be a cultural challenge for healthcare staff, and starting a new programme means additional workload. Patients' willingness to make decisions in their own asthma care can also be poor.9 Educating and motivating both patients and healthcare teams are crucial for a successful self management programme. The good results achieved with self management programmes should be emphasised and shown, and information supplied should be kept as clear and simple as possible.
There is reasonable consensus on the self management skills that
patients should possess as a result of education (box
2).12 Although research evaluating education for
asthma has been conducted in many settings
hospitals, emergency rooms,
general practices, community organisations, hospital outpatient
clinics
there have been no studies assessing the effect of the setting
on education. It would seem reasonable to expect that education should
be available at every patient contact for each setting and that the
information should be given in a structured form. In my experience,
group sessions plus personal counselling is the most effective method for educating asthmatic patients. Good audiovisual material can give
help and increase interest. Although asthmatic patients have a strong
desire to be informed about their illness,9 their individual backgrounds will influence the extent to which they utilise
information. The patient's own responsibility for treatment is
crucial, and building a firm partnership with the patient is the key to
success. The responsibility for treatment is borne by the patient and
the primary healthcare system, supported by specialised medical care.
In asthma self management the patients should not be seen as objects
for treatment but rather as active participants in a treatment
team.
|
|
Information alone is insufficient, and successful interventions combine the provision of information with individualised self treatment plans. Such action plans may be based on symptoms, peak expiratory flow values, or both.13 It is essential that patients notice exacerbations in their asthma (box 3) early enough and start appropriate interventions by themselves. Self management programmes for asthma have used different action limits or zones for peak expiratory flow or symptoms. Clear peak flow charts or pocket sized cards with colours to mark different action limits can be used. For example14:
use regular treatment
double dose of inhaled steroids
start course of oral prednisone
go to emergency room immediately.
Programmes for self management of asthma should be aimed primarily at those patients who probably will benefit the most (box 4), and programmes should be individualised to suit the patient.
|
In Finland, regional asthma networks according to the Finnish
national asthma programme15 have been built up between
general practice and specialised care to enforce the quality and
continuity of asthma care. The experiences of these networks are good
and they help asthma self management to work.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Competing interests: None declared.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Blainey D, Lomas D, Beale A, Partridge MR.
The cost of acute asthma how much is preventable?
Health Trends
1991;
22:
151-153.
|
| 2. | Johnson AJ, Nunn AJ, Somner AR, Stableforth DE, Stewart CJ. Circumstances of death from asthma. BMJ 1984; 288: 1870-1875. |
| 3. | Avery CH, March J, Brook RH. An assessment of the adequacy of self-care by adult asthmatics. J Community Health 1980; 5: 167-180[Medline]. |
| 4. | Partridge MR. Patients' self assessment and treatment strategies for acute asthma. Res Clin Forums 1993; 15: 65-73. |
| 5. | Kendrick AH, Higgs CMB, Whitfield MJ, Laszlo G. Accuracy of perception of severity of asthma: patients treated in general practice. BMJ 1993; 307: 422-424. |
| 6. | Partridge MR. Self-management in adults with asthma. Patient Educ Counseling 1997; 32: 1-4[Medline]. |
| 7. | Gibson PG, Coughlan J, Wilson AJ, Abramson M, Bauman A, Hensley MJ, et al. Self-management education and regular practitioner review for adults with asthma. In: Cochrane Collaboration ed. Cochrane Library. Issue 2. Oxford: Update Software, 1999. |
| 8. | Liljas B, Lahdensuo A. Is asthma self-management cost-effective? Patient Educ Counseling 1997; 32: 97-104. |
| 9. |
Gibson PG, Talbot PI, Toneguzzi RE, the Population Medicine Group.
Self-management, autonomy and quality of life in asthma.
Chest
1995;
107:
1003-1008 |
| 10. |
Osman LM, Abdalla MI, Beattle JAG, Ross SJ, Russell IT, Friend JA, et al.
Reducing hospital admissions through computer supported education for asthma patients.
BMJ
1994;
308:
568-571 |
| 11. | Kleiger JH, Dirks JF. Medication compliance in chronic asthma patients. J Asthma Res 1979; 16: 93-96[Medline]. |
| 12. | American Lung Association Working Group. Standards for comprehensive asthma education programs. New York: ALA, 1998. |
| 13. | Charlton I, Charlton G, Broomfield J, Mullee MA. Evaluation of peak flow and symptoms only self management plans for control of asthma in general practice. BMJ 1990; 301: 1355-1359. |
| 14. |
Lahdensuo A, Haahtela T, Herrala J, Kava T, Kiviranta K, Kuusisto P, et al.
Randomised comparison of guided self management and traditional treatment of asthma over one year.
BMJ
1996;
312:
748-752 |
| 15. | Ministry of Social Affairs and Health. Asthma programme in Finland 1994-2004. Clin Exp Allergy 1996; 26(suppl1): 1-24. |
Read all Rapid Responses