BMJ 1999;319:455 ( 14 August )

Letters

Patients with tuberculosis can be managed effectively in the community

EDITOR---Coker observes that the urgency of the response to tuberculosis reflects how society views those on its margins.1 In contrast, a recent report from New York stated that, despite a reluctance to impose restrictive measures of mandatory directly observed treatment, over 3% of patients with tuberculosis (over 200 patients) between 1993 and 1995 did receive regulatory orders.2 These are two diametrically opposed positions to the public health response to the same disease.

In New South Wales, Australia, public health orders can be imposed under the Public Health Act 1991. Yet in over eight years, not a single order has led to a patient with tuberculosis being imprisoned. Notifications of over 500 cases of tuberculosis per year mean that over 4000 cases have been effectively managed in the community. Community based services have been able to manage every case of tuberculosis, using clinic based nurses with minimal involvement of medical staff; standardised treatment according to health department protocols; and directly observed treatment, which has been practised for over 30 years. Thus costs have been contained and levels of drug resistance have remained low.3

Rather than investing in a good public health system and well resourced community based services, the United States seems to be using "deprivation of liberty" to solve not only its social problems4 but also its tuberculosis epidemic. This is an abuse of human rights and makes no sense in terms of public health.

Introducing cases of active tuberculosis into the closed environment of a prison is inherently dangerous. High levels of mobility within prisons, and between prisons and the community, facilitate transmission of tuberculosis between the community and prisons (in both directions) and create the situation in which epidemics in prisons occur.5

London ought to be looking to effective programmes rather than copying yet another American mistake.

Michael H Levy, director
Population Health, Corrections Health Service, PO Box 150 Matraville, NSW 2036, Australia

Garth Alperstein, area community paediatrician
Central Sydney Community Health Services, Camperdown, NSW 2050 Australia alpersteing{at}phu.rpa.cs.nsw.gov.au



1. Coker R. Public health, civil liberties, and tuberculosis. BMJ 1999; 318: 1434-1435[Free Full Text]. (24 April.)
2. Gasner RM, Maw KL, Feldman GE, Fujiwara PI, Frieden TR. The use of legal action in New York City to ensure treatment of tuberculosis. N Engl J Med 1999; 340: 359-366[Abstract/Free Full Text].
3. Dawson D. Tuberculosis in Australia: bacteriologically confirmed cases and drug resistance, 1996. Report of the Australian Mycobacterium Reference Laboratory Network. Commun Dis Intell 1998; 22: 183-188[Medline].
4. Stern V. A sin against the future: imprisonment in the world. London: Penguin , 1998.
5. Coninx R, Eshaya-Chauvin B, Reyes H. Tuberculosis in prisons. Lancet 1995; 346: 1238-1239[Medline].


© BMJ 1999

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Article

Public health, civil liberties, and tuberculosis
Richard Coker
BMJ 1999 318: 1434-1435. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Maher, D., Uplekar, M., Blanc, L., Raviglione, M. (2003). Treatment of tuberculosis. BMJ 327: 822-823 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Response
Thomas R Frieden
bmj.com, 29 Sep 1999 [Full text]



Student BMJ

Sepsis

The latest guidlines will affect how we practice medicine

www.student.bmj.com

Listen to the latest BMJ Interview