Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Matthias Schlegel a Department
of Medicine, Kantonsspital, 9007 St Gallen, Switzerland, b Emergency Department,
Kantonsspital, 9007 St Gallen, c Institute for Clinical Microbiology and
Immunology, 9001 St Gallen
Correspondence to: Dr Vernazza
Pietro.Vernazza{at}kssg.ch
After the introduction of immunisation against measles,
mumps, and rubella, numerous outbreaks of mumps were reported in the 1980s and '90s in Switzerland and southern Europe.
1 2
The Rubini strain is still widely used in Europe,3 and we
report here a large outbreak of mumps in a population with a high
vaccination rate and examine the differential efficacy of the three
vaccine strains.
An outbreak was investigated in a small village in
Switzerland. All children (ages 5-13) were included in the cohort.
Information on immunisation status was obtained from vaccine
certificates. The person who investigated the cases of mumps was
blinded with regard to the vaccination status. A case was defined if
mumps virus was isolated on culture, if a doctor confirmed the
diagnosis, or if the typical clinical picture was described in a
sibling of a patient with confirmed disease. The absence of IgG
antibodies to mumps virus served as confirmation of full susceptibility
to mumps in non-vaccinated children without clinical signs of the disease.
The cohort comprised 165 children. All questionnaires sent to
their parents were returned and evaluated (response rate 100%). All
immunised children had received their immunisation before the age of 2 years, almost half with the Rubini strain (table). Sixty six cases of
epidemic parotitis occurred, resulting in an overall attack rate of
40%. Altogether 11(16%) children had parotid enlargement without
fever; only one case (vaccinated with the Rubini strain) had a
complicated course that required hospital admission. The attack rate
was similar in unvaccinated children (63%) and children vaccinated
with the Rubini strain (67%) but significantly lower in those
vaccinated with the Jeryl-Lynn (14%) or the Urabe strain (8%)
(table). When the attack rate for the two currently available vaccine
strains was compared the relative risk of developing mumps was 4.8-fold
greater (95% confidence interval 2.1 to 11.1) in children vaccinated
with the Rubini compared with the Jeryl-Lynn strain. The low vaccine
efficacy of the Rubini strain was observed throughout all age groups.
In contrast, cases of mumps in children vaccinated with the Jeryl-Lynn
or Urabe strains occurred only at the age of 8 or older. In the three
vaccine categories no difference in the severity of mumps was
observed.
More than a decade after systematic vaccination was
introduced, the incidence of mumps is still high in Switzerland, Spain, and Italy. Several explanations for this are under discussion: inadequate vaccination rates, natural periodicity, and other factors such as differences in viral strains and loss of mucosal immunity. This
study is notable because it describes an outbreak in a rural population
with a high vaccination rate (95%). The attack rate of 63% in the
unvaccinated group is consistent with other published reports. When
compared with no vaccination, immunisation with the Rubini strain
resulted in no detectable benefit.
Several serological surveys show comparable seroconversion rates for
the Rubini, Jeryl-Lynn, and Urabe strains, but under field conditions
other variables might be more relevant. This study supports the general
importance of postmarketing surveillance.
To eliminate a disease a vaccination programme must achieve a high
coverage with a vaccine that results in a substantial (>85%) vaccine
efficacy.4 The Rubini strain investigated in this study clearly did not fulfil the second requirement. From a public health perspective, immunisation against mumps with the Rubini strain should
be strongly discouraged unless the field efficacy of this vaccine is
convincingly shown.
A second vaccination dose is generally recommended between the ages of
7 and 10 years. Other countries, such as Finland, eliminated indigenous
mumps by instituting a two dose regimen with the Jeryl-Lynn strain.5 In agreement with this recommendation, we found
no cases of mumps in children under 7 vaccinated with the Jeryl-Lynn or
Urabe strain.
![]()
Participants, methods, and results
Top
Participants, methods, and...
Comment
References
![]()
Comment
Top
Participants, methods, and...
Comment
References
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank the parents and children for providing the information for this study. We especially thank Diane Feldman for editing the manuscript, Dr Thomas Ammann (general practitioner) for the clinical data collection, Dr Hanspeter Zimmermann for general advice, Dr Christoph Minder for statistical advice, Dr Detlev Schultze and Edith Zwicky for laboratory support, and Isabella Brenner for logistical support. PLV is supported by a grant from the Swiss National Foundation (3233-48902.96).
Contributors: MS was the primary investigator involved in the discussion of the core ideas, study design, development of the questionnaire, data collection, and analysis and wrote the manuscript. PLV initiated the study; participated in the study design, data documentation, and analysis; and contributed to the writing of the paper. JJO discussed core ideas, participated in the study design, performed the statistical analysis, and edited the paper. RLG discussed core ideas, participated in the protocol design and interpretation of the data, and edited the paper. PLV is guarantor for the study.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Funding: None.
Competing interests: None declared.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Expanded Programme on Immunization. Immunization coverage against measles, mumps and rubella. Wkly Epidemiol Rec 1993; 68: 83-86[Medline]. |
| 2. | Germann D, Ströhle A, Eggenberger K, Steiner CA, Matter L. An outbreak of mumps in a population partially vaccinated with the Rubini strain. Scand J Infect Dis 1996; 28: 235-238[Medline]. |
| 3. | D'Argenio P, Citarella A, Selvaggi MT, Benvento CPN. Field evaluation of the clinical effectiveness of vaccines against pertussis, measles, rubella and mumps. Vaccine 1998; 16: 818-822[Medline]. |
| 4. | Anderson RM, May RM. Modern vaccines: immunisation and herd immunity. Lancet 1990; 335: 641-645[Medline]. |
| 5. |
Peltola H, Heinonen OP, Valle M, Paunio M, Virtanen M, Karanko V, et al.
The elimination of indigenous measles, mumps, and rubella from Finland by 12-year, two-dose vaccination program.
N Engl J Med
1994;
331:
1397-1402 |
(Accepted 5 March)
Read all Rapid Responses