Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Elise Kosunen a Department of General Practice, Medical
School, University of Tampere, PO Box 607, FIN-33101 Tampere, Finland, b Tampere School of Public Health, University of
Tampere,, c National Research and Development Centre for
Welfare and Health, PO Box 220, FIN-00531 Helsinki, Finland
Correspondence to: Dr Kosunen meelko{at}uta.fi
Easy accessibility and availability of emergency
contraception raises contradictory opinions. Education about emergency
contraception is resisted because of a fear that it might lead to
irresponsible sexual behaviour and repeated use of emergency
contraception instead of regular contraception.1
In Finland, sales of emergency contraception (the Yuzpe method)
increased 10-fold from 1987 to the mid-1990s. In 1994 a national survey
among 18-44 year old women showed that knowledge and use of the method
was concentrated in the youngest respondents.2 Reports
from other countries confirm that young women and even teenagers are
well aware of the method.
3 4
However, only a few reports
have been published on use of emergency contraception among
adolescents. We studied knowledge of emergency contraception and
frequency of use among teenagers.
The school health promotion study was introduced to
provide data on adolescent health behaviours in Finland. Regional and local school authorities were told about the study, and 96 out of 452 municipalities joined it in 1996. Pupils anonymously completed a
structured questionnaire during one lesson under the supervision of
their teacher and enclosed the questionnaire in an envelope directed to
the research group.
The total number of respondents was 52 700, and the response rate
was 88-91% for comprehensive schools and 82% for upper secondary schools. We report here data on girls in comprehensive schools born in
1981 (mean age 14.8 years, range 14.3-15.2) and 1980 (15.8 years, range
15.3-16.2) and girls in upper secondary schools born in 1978 (17.8 years, 17.3-18.2); the total number of girls was 21 940.
The question on emergency contraception asked: "Have you ever
used emergency contraception?" Alternative responses were: (1) No;
(2) Yes. How many times altogether? Number of times? or (3) I do not
know what emergency contraception is. The questionnaire also asked
whether the respondent had ever had sexual intercourse.
Only 3% of the 14-15 year olds and 1.5% of the 17 year olds did
not know what emergency contraception was (table). The proportion of
girls who had used emergency contraception increased with age from
2.1% to 15.1%. About two thirds of all girls who had used emergency
contraception had used it only once (table). The proportion of multiple
users did not suggest any systematic increase with age.
![]()
Participants, methods, and results
Top
Participants, methods, and...
Comment
References
In comprehensive schools, 13.3% of 14 year olds and 28.8% of 15 year olds had had sexual intercourse at least once, while among 17 year
olds the prevalence was 51.5%.
| |
Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In Finland, emergency contraception is delivered as a part of primary health care in local health centres and family planning clinics.5 Adolescents get information on contraception in sex education lessons at schools. School health care advises on problems of sexuality, including need of emergency contraception.
The adolescent girls were widely aware of emergency contraception, which is consistent with results for younger women in other countries. 3 4 We only asked about knowledge of the existence of the method: the results may not indicate that adolescents were well informed of details of its use. British studies have shown that although adolescents know about emergency contraception, they are unclear how to obtain the pills and how to use them.3 4
Emergency contraception has not become a contraceptive choice
replacing conventional methods among adolescents. Only a small proportion of teenagers had used emergency contraception repeatedly. Our results suggest that easy access to contraceptive services (including emergency contraception) and intensive sex education have
not increased adolescent sexual activity. The proportion of sexually
experienced teenagers in our study was not higher than in Finnish
studies in the late 1980s or early 1990s when emergency contraception
was not widely used.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
Contributors: EK participated in planning the questionnaire, formulated the present study, and had main responsibility for writing the paper. She is the study guarantor. AV and HH carried out the statistical analyses. MR initiated and designed the school health promotion study, organised collection and recording of data, and participated in analysis of data. AR participated in planning the study and analysing data. The results were interpreted and the paper was written jointly by all authors.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Funding: Ministry of Social Affairs and Health has supported the study from the health promotion fund. Local municipalities have financed the data collection at schools.
Competing interests: None declared.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Stubblefield R.
Self-administered emergency contraception a second chance.
N Engl J Med
1998;
339:
41-42 |
| 2. | Kosunen E, Sihvo S, Hemminki E. Knowledge and use of hormonal emergency contraception in Finland. Contraception 1997; 55: 153-157[Medline]. |
| 3. | Smith B, Gurney E, Aboulela L, Templeton A. Emergency contraception: a survey of women's knowledge and attitudes. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 103: 1109-1116[Medline]. |
| 4. |
Graham A, Green L, Glasier AF.
Teenagers' knowledge of emergency contraception: questionnaire survey in south east Scotland.
BMJ
1996;
312:
1567-1569 |
| 5. | Rimpela M, Rimpela A, Kosunen E. From control policy to comprehensive family planning: success stories from Finland. Int J Health Promotion Educ 1996; 3: 28-32. |
(Accepted 19 January 1999)
Read all Rapid Responses