Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Douglas G Altman a ICRF Medical
Statistics Group, Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Institute of
Health Sciences, Oxford OX3 7LF, b Department of
Public Health Sciences, St George's Hospital Medical School, London
SW17 0RE
Correspondence to: Professor Altman.
Like all specialist areas, statistics has developed its own
language. As we have noted before,1 much confusion may
arise when a word in common use is also given a technical meaning.
Statistics abounds in such terms, including normal, random, variance,
significant, etc. Two commonly confused terms are variable and
parameter; here we explain and contrast them.
Information recorded about a sample of individuals (often patients)
comprises measurements such as blood pressure, age, or weight and
attributes such as blood group, stage of disease, and diabetes. Values
of these will vary among the subjects; in this context blood pressure,
weight, blood group and so on are variables. Variables are quantities
which vary from individual to individual.
By contrast, parameters do not relate to actual measurements or
attributes but to quantities defining a theoretical model. The figure
shows the distribution of measurements of serum albumin in 481 white
men aged over 20 with mean 46.14 and standard deviation 3.08 g/l. For
the empirical data the mean and SD are called sample estimates. They
are properties of the collection of individuals. Also shown is the
normal1 distribution which fits the data most closely. It
too has mean 46.14 and SD 3.08 g/l. For the theoretical distribution
the mean and SD are called parameters. There is not one normal
distribution but many, called a family of distributions. Each member of
the family is defined by its mean and SD, the parameters1 which specify the particular theoretical normal distribution with which
we are dealing. In this case, they give the best estimate of the
population distribution of serum albumin if we can assume that in the
population serum albumin has a normal
distribution.

View larger version (14K):
[in a new window]
Measurements of serum albumin in 481 white men aged over 20 (data from Dr W G Miller)
Most statistical methods, such as t tests, are called parametric because they estimate parameters of some underlying theoretical distribution. Non-parametric methods, such as the Mann-Whitney U test and the log rank test for survival data, do not assume any particular family for the distribution of the data and so do not estimate any parameters for such a distribution.
Another use of the word parameter relates to its original mathematical meaning as the value(s) defining one of a family of curves. If we fit a regression model, such as that describing the relation between lung function and height, the slope and intercept of this line (more generally known as regression coefficients) are the parameters defining the model. They have no meaning for individuals, although they can be used to predict an individual's lung function from their height.
In some contexts parameters are values that can be altered to see what happens to the performance of some system. For example, the performance of a screening programme (such as positive predictive value or cost effectiveness) will depend on aspects such as the sensitivity and specificity of the screening test. If we look to see how the performance would change if, say, sensitivity and specificity were improved, then we are treating these as parameters rather than using the values observed in a real set of data.
Parameter is a technical term which has only recently found its way into general use, unfortunately without keeping its correct meaning. It is common in medical journals to find variables incorrectly called parameters (but not in the BMJ we hope2). Another common misuse of parameter is as a limit or boundary, as in "within certain parameters." This misuse seems to have arisen from confusion between parameter and perimeter.
Misuse of medical terms is rightly deprecated. Like other language
errors it leads to confusion and the loss of valuable distinction. Misuse of non-medical terms should be viewed likewise.
References
| 1. |
Altman DG, Bland JM.
The normal distribution.
BMJ
1995;
310:
298 |
| 2. |
Endpiece: What's a parameter?
BMJ
1998;
316:
1877 |
Read all Rapid Responses