Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Douglas Carnall Cyclists are advised to wear helmets but legislation to make them
compulsory is likely to reduce the number of people choosing to cycle
and would not be in the interests of health, concludes the BMA's Board
of Education and Science.
International evidence shows that the compulsory use of helmets results
in a fall in the number of cyclists. The Australian state of Victoria
made the use of helmets compulsory in 1990, and in the following year
deaths and head injuries among cyclists fell between 37%and
51%However, 40%fewer adults and 60%fewer children continued to cycle
after the introduction of the laws.
About one in five cyclists in Britain currently wears a helmet. This
proportion would have to be increased by promotional campaigns
encouraging voluntary action before legislation could hope to be effective.
Some cyclists are opposed to wearing helmets. Research by the European
Cycling Federation found that non-cyclists tended to be most in favour
of helmets. In fact, a much greater number of lives would be saved if
pedestrians and car occupants were encouraged to wear helmets.
The board's previous reports have concluded that the benefit to health
of regular exercise from cycling outweighs the British cyclist's
comparatively high risk of trauma. In countries such as the Netherlands
and Denmark pedestrians and cyclists form a much smaller proportion of
those injured or killed on the road, though helmets are little used.
Instead, these countries have concentrated on safety programmes to
reduce motor traffic speeds to 30 km/h in urban areas and separate
cyclists from fast moving traffic.
Properly fitted helmets manufactured to accepted standards can reduce
the severity of head injury in a crash, though the tests on which these
standards are based mimic a fall from a cycle rather than collision
with a fast moving vehicle, which is most likely to harm an adult cyclist.
Children are more likely to simply fall off their bicycles and may
therefore derive more benefit from wearing a helmet. However, the
cost The report recommends that the government should consider subsidising
this cost, along with other measures to promote helmets manufactured to
the highest standard (Snell B95). It also recommends that every child
should be given the opportunity to learn cycling proficiency and that
the driving test should be modified to test specifically for awareness
of cyclists and other road users.
between £12 and £90
and the necessity of replacing helmets every few years as the child grows may be prohibitive.

(Credit: PETE SALOUTOS/THE STOCK MARKET)
Children may derive more benefit than adults from cycle helmets
Read all Rapid Responses
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+