Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Low vision aids are a simple way of alleviating impairment
Visual impairment is responsible for much individual
suffering and economic hardship. Magnifying devices and other types of low vision aid can significantly reduce the degree of handicap associated with impaired vision. Two thirds of the people who would
benefit from a low vision aid (about 600 000 people in the United
Kingdom), however, do not possess one.1 What are the reasons for this disturbing situation?
Currently about 316 000 people are registered as blind or partially
sighted. However, the registers underestimate the number of people with
low vision by a factor of three,2 so almost 1 000 000
people in the United Kingdom have untreatable low vision. Community
based surveys support this estimate and have shown that around 20% of
those aged 75 and over have visual acuity less than 6/12.3
With the advent of annual screening for patients over 75 and the high
prevalence of visual impairment, general practitioners are becoming
increasingly familiar with low vision and its associated problems such
as depression and falls.
4 5
Demographic trends indicate that the situation is likely to get
worse because the causes of low vision are predominantly age related.
Unfortunately, medical intervention is unlikely to offer much help. No
treatment currently exists for age related maculopathy, the primary
cause of visual impairment in the United Kingdom. Furthermore, although
continuing advances in the management of conditions such as glaucoma
and diabetes are likely to reduce the degree of visual impairment
associated with these conditions, the overall number of people with
impaired sight may not diminish because the benefits of improved
management are likely to be offset by the general trend toward
increased life expectancy.
In the absence of a cure for blindness, rehabilitation is of paramount
importance. The most effective way to reduce the degree of handicap
associated with visual impairment is by providing low vision aids as
part of a comprehensive low vision service.1 When
dispensed appropriately these simple magnifying devices enhance residual vision and often permit people with impaired sight to perform
daily tasks such as reading. Regrettably, evidence based on
observational studies and expert opinion collated by the Partially Sighted Society suggests that many people are not benefiting from this
simple form of management.1 The greatest consequence of this failure is that many old people require residential care because
they can no longer live alone.1 So why are low vision aids underused?
One reason might be that the benefits to be gained from the use
of low vision aids are not widely recognised in the community. Yet the
ability of these devices to alleviate the problems associated with
visual impairment is well established,
1 6-8
and has been highlighed at Cardiff University's low vision clinic, which provides low vision services for the people of south Wales. Data collected over
six months from 168 new referrals showed that, although only about 20%
of those referred could read normal print when they first came to the
clinic, this figure rose to almost 90% after provision of a suitable
low vision aid and some training (unpublished data). Rarely can medical
intervention be so effective. The improvement in reading performance
addresses the primary complaint of people with age related maculopathy,
and it is perhaps for this reason that more than 80% of people report
a benefit from attending low vision clinics.6 Other
reasons why people with impaired vision do not benefit from a low
vision assessment include the fact that some may fail to recognise
their degree of visual impairment or fear treatment, the stigma of
blindness, and differences in ophthalmological referral criteria.
Nevertheless, low vision aids provide a simple and effective means of
alleviating the problems associated with visual impairment. Greater
provision of these inexpensive devices would greatly reduce both the
social and economic impact of low vision.
Department of Optometry and Vision Sciences, Cardiff
University, Cardiff CF1 3XF
| 1. | Lomas GM. Low vision in the UK: toward a framework for delivering low vision care. London: Partially Sighted Society , 1998. |
| 2. | Bruce I, McKennell A, Walker E. Blind and partially sighted adults in Britain: the RNIB survey. , Vol 1 London: HMSO , 1991. |
| 3. | Wormald RP, Wright LA, Courtney P, Beaumont B, Haines AP. Visual problems in the elderly population and implications for services. BMJ 1992; 304: 1226-1229. |
| 4. | Rovner BW, Zisselman PM, Shmuely-Dulitzki Y. Depression and disability in older people with impaired vision: a follow up study. J Am Geriatr Soc 1996; 44: 181-184[Medline]. |
| 5. | Felson DT, Anderson IJ, Hannan MT, Milton RC, Wilson MC, Kiel DP. Impaired vision and hip fracture, the Framingham study. J Am Geriatr Soc 1989; 37: 495-500[Medline]. |
| 6. | Leat SJ, Fryer A, Rumney NJ. Outcome of low-vision aid provision-the effectiveness of a low vision clinic. Optom Vis Sci 1994; 71: 199-206[Medline]. |
| 7. | Virtanen P, Laatikainen L. Low-vision aids in age-related macular degeneration. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 1993; 4: 33-35[Medline]. |
| 8. | Farrall H. Optometric management of visual handicap. London: Blackwell Scientific , 1991. |
Read all Rapid Responses
Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.