Education and the BMJ: could we do better?

The BMJ wants to continue improving its educational content - to help doctors educate themselves and to help them to educate others. As part of this process, we have published the first version of our guidelines for evaluating papers on educational interventions. These are aimed at authors, editors, reviewers, and readers, and are by no means final.

We welcome your comments on these guidelines, as well as your views on our clinical review section which comprises fortnightly reviews; articles on recent advances; lessons of the week; evidence based case reports; and articles on science, medicine, and the future.

What do you think?

Are the guidelines useful?

How could they be improved?

Are articles in our clinical review section clear, useful, and relevant to clinicians?

Do we need to change our approach? If so, how?

We would greatly value your response.