Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Greg A Knoll Division of
Nephrology, Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, University of
Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8L6, Canada
Correspondence to: Dr Knoll gknoll{at}ogh.on.ca
Objective:
To compare tacrolimus with cyclosporin for immunosuppression in renal transplantation.
The number of new patients requiring dialysis or renal
transplantation for permanent kidney failure is increasing worldwide. In the United Kingdom 46% of patients with permanent renal failure have a functioning kidney transplant.1 Much of the success in organ transplantation has been credited to the use of cyclosporin; after its introduction renal graft survival at 1 year increased from
64% to 78%.2 Despite the improvement in early graft
function, long term kidney graft survival has not changed dramatically
since the introduction of cyclosporin.2 The chronic loss
of transplanted kidneys and the potential toxicity of cyclosporin has
prompted the development of other immunosuppressant drugs. Tacrolimus
(FK506), a drug which has a similar mode of action to cyclosporin, was first used in clinical transplantation in 1989.3 Benefits
of treatment with tacrolimus have included a reduction in steroid dose,
4 5
a decreased need for antihypertensive
drugs,4 and a lower serum cholesterol
concentration.4
In 1995 Gjertson et al reported a significant improvement in long term
renal graft survival for recipients of tacrolimus based immunosuppression.2 Patients who received tacrolimus had a renal allograft half life of 13.8 years compared with 8.8 years for
recipients of cyclosporin based treatment.2 A recent
analysis of this database, however, has failed to confirm these early
findings.6 In addition, no randomised trial has shown an
improvement in renal graft survival at 1 year for patients receiving
tacrolimus.
4 7-9
Despite the conflicting data concerning
allograft survival, the use of tacrolimus in kidney transplantation has
increased considerably.6 To help clarify the role of
tacrolimus in renal transplantation we conducted a systematic review of
randomised trials that compared tacrolimus with cyclosporin for immunosuppression.
Literature search
Study selection
Quality assessment
Data analysis
![]()
Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
Design:
Meta-analysis of randomised trials of two treatments after kidney transplantation.
Identification:
Four studies involving 1037 patients.
Trials were included if they were randomised, the intervention
group received tacrolimus, the control group received cyclosporin, the patients were followed for a minimum of 12 months, and patient survival, graft survival, incidence of acute rejection, need for antilymphocyte treatment, or the prevalence of diabetes mellitus after
transplant was reported.
Main outcome measures:
Pooled estimates of patient
mortality, allograft loss, and episodes of acute rejection 1 year after transplantation.
Results:
The odds ratio for loss of allograft with tacrolimus compared with cyclosporin was 0.95 (95% confidence interval
0.65 to 1.40). The odds ratio for mortality with tacrolimus was 1.07 (0.47 to 2.48). Treatment with tacrolimus was associated with a
reduction in episodes of acute rejection (0.52; 0.36 to 0.75), a
reduction in the use of antilymphocyte antibodies to treat rejection
(0.37; 0.25 to 0.56), and an increased prevalence of diabetes mellitus
after transplantation (5.03; 2.04 to 12.36) compared with treatment
with cyclosporin.
Conclusions:
After renal transplantation,
immunosuppression with tacrolimus results in a significant reduction in
acute rejection compared with cyclosporin. Follow up studies of high
methodological quality are needed to determine whether tacrolimus
improves long term renal graft survival.
Key messages
![]()
Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
The Medline database was searched for relevant studies published
between 1985 and September 1998. The following terms were used:
tacrolimus, FK506, Prograf, and kidney transplantation. A similar
search strategy was carried out on the Embase database for studies
published from 1989 to January 1998 as well as on the Cochrane Library
(issue 3, 1998) database. Issues of Transplantation (1987 to September 1998) and Transplantation Proceedings
(1987 to September 1998) were hand searched for relevant publications. The reference lists from all identified studies and review articles were examined for any relevant articles. To locate any unpublished studies the medical editors' trial amnesty (Cochrane Library) was
searched and the manufacturer of tacrolimus (Fujisawa USA, Deerfield,
Illinois) was contacted.
One investigator assessed all the titles and abstracts identified
in the literature review. A hard copy was obtained for every study
considered to be potentially relevant. Studies published in any
language were eligible for inclusion. Both investigators assessed every
potentially relevant article. To be included in the analysis the
following criteria had to be met: the study was a randomised controlled
trial; the study population consisted of recipients of primary or
repeat renal transplants (cadaveric or living donor); the intervention
group received tacrolimus as prophylaxis against acute rejection in the
early period after transplantation; the control group received
cyclosporin as prophylaxis against acute rejection in the early period
after transplantation; the study reported one of the following
outcomes: patient or graft survival, incidence of acute rejection, need
for antilymphocyte treatment, or the prevalence of post-transplant
diabetes mellitus; and the study had a minimum of 12 months' follow
up. Agreement between observers for study selection was assessed with
the
statistic. Any disagreement on study inclusion was resolved by discussion.
The methodological quality of all included studies was assessed
with the Jadad scale.10 This validated scale measures
blinding, randomisation, withdrawals, and drop outs. A maximum score of
5 represents the highest quality. All included studies were assessed
independently by both investigators. Any disagreement on quality score
was resolved by discussion.
Data were abstracted by one investigator and verified by the
other. From each report we determined year of publication, number, age,
and sex of participants, donor source, number of previous transplants,
original renal disease, and dose and duration of immunosuppressive
medications. The main outcome measures were graft loss at 1 year
(defined as death with a functioning allograft or return to dialysis)
and patient mortality at 1 year. Secondary outcome measures included
the incidence of acute rejection in the 1st year after transplantation,
the need for antilymphocyte treatment for acute rejection, and the
prevalence of post-transplant diabetes mellitus 1 year after
transplantation (defined as the need for insulin at 1 year in patients
without a history of diabetes).
0.1 considered significant.
Sensitivity analysis
To assess the robustness of the analysis we calculated
the summary odds ratio, firstly, for studies that had a
methodological quality score >2 and, secondly, for studies that used antilymphocyte antibodies immediately after transplantation (induction immunosuppression).
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The search strategy identified 499 articles, of which 129 were considered potentially relevant and were reviewed as full
articles. Eight articles fulfilled the inclusion
criteria
4 7-9 12-15
and 121 were excluded. The
for
interobserver agreement on study inclusion was 0.91. The 121 studies
were excluded for the following reasons: 45 were not randomised
controlled trials, 48 had no comparison with cyclosporin, 15 were
editorial or review articles, six had inadequate follow up or outcome
measures, three were laboratory studies, and four focused on an
unrelated topic. Five studies reported different aspects from the same
group of patients.
7 12-15
Only the original publication
that thoroughly outlined the study methods was selected for inclusion
in this meta-analysis.7 Analysis of data from the same
patient more than once would have resulted in a biased estimate of
treatment effect.16 Thus the final analysis was based on
four studies involving 1037 patients.
4 7-9
Table 1 summarises the baseline characteristics of the studies included in the analysis. Three studies used cadaveric donors only,7-9 and one study included both cadaveric and living donors.4 Most participants were receiving their first renal transplant. The proportion of patients who received tacrolimus was significantly higher in two studies. 8 9 One study randomised patients in a 2:1 ratio of tacrolimus or cyclosporin to gain experience with tacrolimus.8 One study was designed to test a range of concentrations so patients were randomised to one of three tacrolimus regimens or to a cyclosporin based regimen.9 The methodological quality scores were low. All four studies were randomised, and three reported complete follow up information.7-9 None of the studies used a double blind method or described the method of randomisation.
|
|
Table 2 summarises the immunosuppressive protocols of the included studies. Two studies used induction immunosuppression with antilymphocyte antibodies, 7 9 one study did not use induction,8 and the remaining study did not specify if the randomised patients received induction treatment or not.4 Although one study did not specify the initial prednisone dose,4 by the end of the study 55% of the tacrolimus patients were not taking prednisone while most of the cyclosporin group were taking 7.5 mg to 15 mg daily.
All four studies reported on graft loss and patient mortality at 1 year (table 3). There was no significant heterogeneity across the studies for these two outcome measures. There was no significant effect of tacrolimus on graft loss at 1 year (odds ratio 0.95; 95% confidence interval 0.65 to 1.40). Similarly, there was no significant effect of tacrolimus on patient mortality at 1 year (1.07; 0.47 to 2.48).
|
Three studies reported on the incidence of acute rejection in the 1st year after transplantation (see table 4). Treatment with tacrolimus was associated with a significant reduction in episodes of acute rejection (0.52; 0.36 to 0.75). Also, the use of antilymphocyte antibodies to treat rejection was significantly reduced in patients receiving tacrolimus (0.37; 0.25 to 0.56). Three studies reported on the prevalence of post-transplant diabetes mellitus at 1 year.7-9 All three showed that a higher proportion of patients treated with tacrolimus had post-transplant diabetes mellitus. The data from one study, however, were not presented in a manner that permitted inclusion in a summary odds ratio.8 In the combined studies treatment with tacrolimus was associated with a significant increase in the prevalence of post-transplant diabetes mellitus at 1 year (5.03; 2.04 to 12.36).
|
As none of the studies had a methodological quality score >2 the
sensitivity analysis based on study quality was not performed. A
sensitivity analysis of studies that used antilymphocyte induction treatment produced results similar to those from the original analysis
that is, treatment with tacrolimus did not have a significant effect on graft loss (0.68; 0.38 to 1.22) or patient mortality (0.80;
0.20 to 3.21).
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This meta-analysis shows that immunosuppression with tacrolimus results in a significant decrease in episodes of acute rejection and use of antilymphocyte antibody when compared with cyclosporin based treatment. This review, however, did not show any effect of tacrolimus on survival of patients or grafts 1 year after transplantation.
Clinical implications of results
Although there was no difference in patient or graft survival, a
48% reduction in acute rejection is a clinically significant finding.
This means that seven patients would need to be treated with
tacrolimus, rather than cyclosporin, to prevent one episode of acute
rejection.17 Acute rejection often leads to readmission to
hospital, increased diagnostic testing (including allograft biopsy),
and increased immunosuppression with concomitant increased risk of
infection and malignancy, as well as increased costs. More importantly,
acute rejection has been shown to be a major determinant of long term
graft survival.
18 19
Lindholm et al found that the graft
half life was 6.6 years for patients with a history of acute rejection
compared with 12.5 years for recipients without
rejection.18 The impact of a reduction in acute rejection
on graft survival may require a longer follow up period than the 1 year
period used in this study.
Limitations of study
A major limitation of this study is the small number of trials
that were available for analysis. Although there are many publications
on tacrolimus, most have not involved randomised trials. We could have
included non-randomised studies to increase the sample size of our
analysis, but such studies have been shown to produce an exaggerated
treatment effect that is probably biased.24
Conclusions
This meta-analysis of randomised trials has shown that after renal
transplantation tacrolimus based immunosuppression is associated with a
significant reduction in acute rejection, a significant reduction in
use of antilymphocyte antibodies, and a significant increase in the
prevalence of post-transplant diabetes mellitus at 1 year compared
with cyclosporin.
for example, double blinding and adequate
randomisation
to produce more reliable estimates of treatment effect.
Finally, outcome studies with longer follow up are needed to see if the
early reduction in acute rejection translates into improved long term
graft survival.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
Contributors: GK coordinated the study, participated in database and hand searching, study identification, study selection, quality assessment, data extraction, data analysis, data interpretation, and writing of the paper. RB participated in hand searching, study selection, quality assessment, data verification, data interpretation, and writing of the paper. GK is guarantor.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Funding: None.
Competing interests: GK has been reimbursed by Sangstat to attend a meeting on induction therapy in transplantation. RB has spoken at a meeting sponsored by Fujisawa (manufacturers of Prograf (tacrolimus)) but did not receive any financial support or honorarium.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(Accepted 10 February 1999)
Read all Rapid Responses