Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Richard Woodman New data suggest that screening for ovarian cancer may increase
survival in women found to have the disease, but it will be at least
another six years before larger studies can confirm the extent of the
survival advantage.
The findings are based on a pilot feasibility study of ovarian cancer
screening in postmenopausal women aged 45 years or older. The women
were randomised into two groups-10997 were offered screening and 10958 were not. Those in the screening group were offered annual screens for
three years that entailed measurement of the cancer antigen, Ca125, and
ovarian ultrasonography.
The results showed that screening identified 29 women with possible
ovarian cancers. Only six cancers were confirmed, however, and the
remaining 23 cases were false positives. During the seven year follow
up after the screening phase, 10 more cases of ovarian cancer were
found in the screened group and 20 in the control group. The median
survival time of women with the cancer was 73 months in the screened
group and 42 months in the control group (P=0.01). There were nine
deaths from cancer in the screened group compared with 18 in the
control group, but this was not statistically significant
(95%confidence interval 0.78 to 5.13) (Lancet 1999;353:1207-10).
The investigators suggested that the results showed that screening for
ovarian cancer was feasible, had a satisfactory positive predictive
value of 21%and showed preliminary evidence of survival benefit. They
said, however, that a larger randomised trial was needed to confirm
this and to establish all the implications of screening before a
national programme was considered.
One of the researchers, Ian Jacobs, consultant gynaecological
oncologist at St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, said: "The results
are exciting, because for the first time we have evidence that there
may be a survival benefit as a result of screening." But he warned
that it would be "unscrupulous" of the private sector to publicise
provision of screening for ovarian cancer. He said: "There may be a
temptation in the private sector to try to offer ovarian cancer
screening. I would say that this is totally wrong, unless the women are
properly counselled about the possible limitations and disadvantages,
such as the false positive rate. We don't yet know if screening makes
any difference in terms of mortality." A bigger trial that is being
coordinated at St Bartholomew's Hospital and includes 120000 women
should eventually provide definitive answers.
© BMJ 1999
Read all Rapid Responses
Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.