Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Susan O'Connor a United
Bristol Healthcare Trust, Directorate of Mental Health, Barrow
Hospital, Bristol BS19 3SG, b ICRF/NHS Centre for
Statistics in Medicine, Institute of Health Sciences, Oxford OX3 7LF, c University of
Oxford, Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, Oxford OX3 7JX, d University of Oxford,
Nuffield Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, John Radcliffe Hospital,
Oxford OX3 9DU, e Glasgow University Media Unit, Glasgow G12 8LF
Correspondence to: Dr
O'Connor
Paracetamol is the drug most commonly taken in overdose in
the United Kingdom,1 causing a substantial number of
deaths.2 We have investigated the impact of the fictional
portrayal of a potentially fatal paracetamol overdose in the television
drama Casualty (seen by 12.8 million viewers) on short
and long term knowledge related to paracetamol
poisoning.
The episode (described in detail in accompanying
article3) depicted a man suffering potentially fatal liver
damage after an untreated paracetamol overdose. Although the particular
dose (50 tablets) and delay before presentation (2 days) were
mentioned, the episode did not specify minimal toxic doses or
maximum safe delays.
At one week and 32 weeks after this episode was broadcast, we sent
questionnaires to members of the BBC Television Opinion Panel. Panel
members are recruited by structured sampling to be representative of
the adult UK population and are sent weekly questionnaires related to
their viewing. At one week after the broadcast, we asked them whether
they had viewed the relevant Casualty episode and
questions to test their knowledge of the delayed hepatotoxic effects of
paracetamol in overdose, maximum safe delays before seeking help, and
fatal doses of several drugs commonly used for self poisoning (see
table). The test questions were repeated at 32 weeks after
thebroadcast, together with further questions about members'
interest in medical matters and viewing of other medical dramas and
documentaries. General medical knowledge was tested by two multiple
choice questions: "What is a crash team?" and "What is a
laparotomy?" Responses from the two surveys were linked. At one week,
2792 out of 3115 panel members participated, 1030 (37%) of whom
reported watching the episode. At 32 weeks, 1282 of these participants
remained in the panel, of whom 475 (37%) had seen the episode.
Non-viewers were more likely not to respond or respond "don't
know" to all questions in both surveys. At one week, significantly more viewers (85%) than non-viewers (45%) correctly identified paracetamol as having hepatotoxic effects. By 32 weeks, this knowledge had declined by 12% in viewers (P<0.0005) and increased by 5% in
non-viewers (P=0.004). The effects were little changed by using a
logistic regression model to adjust for demographic factors and
measures of medical interest, knowledge, and viewing habits.
Viewers indicated longer minimal safe delays before seeking help than
non-viewers, the differences being small but significant. There was no
difference between viewers and non-viewers in lethal doses of
paracetamol or the ranking of paracetamol toxicity compared with that
of other drugs.
Rates of deliberate self harm continue to increase: overdose is
the most common method, and paracetamol the most commonly used
substance.1 Baseline knowledge in this study was high: 45% of those who did not see the episode knew of the delayed
hepatotoxicity of paracetamol, possibly reflecting recent extensive
media attention.
Television is an important potential source of medical
information,4 with programmes such as
Casualty attracting audiences of over 10 million. Our
study showed that viewers of a Casualty episode
registered and retained information about paracetamol toxicity
presented in the programme among other distracting story lines.
Interestingly, it also revealed that the knowledge obtained was
strictly restricted to the presented facts and that incomplete messages
might have been misinterpreted. There was also an increase in overdose
presentations to general hospitals after the broadcast.3 Medical messages broadcast within television programmes are likely to
have an impact on the knowledge of the general public: editors should
be aware of this and ensure that they are accurate and complete.
![]()
Subjects, methods, and results
Top
Subjects, methods, and results
Comment
References
![]()
Comment
Top
Subjects, methods, and results
Comment
References
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank the BBC for its help with this project, in particular, Barbara Machin (script writer Casualty), Christine Hamar Brown (script editor Casualty), the Casualty production team, the BBC television opinion panel, the BBC Information Department, and Dr G Hughes (consultant to Casualty).
Contributors: All authors participated in the design of the study and preparing the report. SO'C and KH designed the questionnaires. SO'C and JJD took major responsibility for analysing the results, interpreting the findings, and preparing the report. AK coordinated data collection, DGA provided statistical advice. CB initiated the study. SO'C is guarantor for the study.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Funding: The study was funded by the Nuffield Trust. KH and SS were also supported by Anglia and Oxford NHS Executive Research and Development Committee.
Competing interests: None declared.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(Accepted 18 March 1999)
Read all Rapid Responses