Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Nicholas J Talley a Department of Medicine, University of Sydney,
Nepean Hospital, Penrith, New South Wales 2751, Australia, b KUL
Gasthuisberg, Dienst Maag-en Darmziekten, Leuven, Belgium 3000, c Department of
Medical Gastroenterology, Odense University, Denmark 5000, d Petz Aladar
Teaching and County Hospital, Eyôr, Hungary 9002, e Department of Biomedicine and
Surgery, University of Linköping, Molndal, Sweden 581 85
Correspondence to: Professor Talley talley{at}pnc.com.au
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Objectives:
To determine whether eradication of
Helicobacter pylori relieves the symptoms of functional dyspepsia.
Design:
Multicentre randomised double blind placebo controlled trial.
Subjects:
278 patients infected with H
pylori who had functional dyspepsia.
Setting:
Predominantly secondary care centres in
Australia, New Zealand, and Europe.
Intervention:
Patients randomised to receive
omeprazole 20 mg twice daily, amoxicillin 1000 mg twice daily, and
clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily or placebo for 7 days. Patients were
followed up for 12 months.
Main outcome measures:
Symptom status (assessed by
diary cards) and presence of H pylori (assessed by
gastric biopsies and 13C-urea breath testing using urea
labelled with carbon-13).
Results:
H pylori was eradicated in 113 patients (85%) in the treatment group and 6 patients (4%) in the
placebo group. At 12 months follow up there was no significant
difference between the proportion of patients treated successfully by
intention to treat in the eradication arm (24%, 95% confidence
interval 17% to 32%) and the proportion of patients treated
successfully by intention to treat in the placebo group (22%, 15% to
30%). Changes in symptom scores and quality of life did not
significantly differ between the treatment and placebo groups. When the
groups were combined, there was a significant association between
treatment success and chronic gastritis score at 12 months; 41/127
(32%) patients with no or mild gastritis were successfully treated
compared with 21/123 (17%) patients with persistent gastritis
(P=0.008).
Conclusion:
No convincing evidence was found that
eradication of H pylori relieves the symptoms of
functional dyspepsia 12 months after treatment.
|
Key messages
|
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Most patients with dyspepsia do not have any peptic ulceration or other disease1-4; they are classed as having functional dyspepsia. About 50% of patients with functional dyspepsia have co-existent Helicobacter pylori gastritis, 3 5-7 but it is unclear whether H pylori causes symptoms in the absence of peptic ulceration.8-10
Carefully conducted trials should be able to determine whether or not H pylori is a cause of functional dyspepsia, as symptoms would be expected to abate when H pylori was eradicated.11 Previous trials, however, have been conflicting and the methods have been generally suboptimal. 8 9 Moreover, few studies have tested whether eradication of H pylori improves dyspepsia long term. As it may take at least 12 months for gastritis, as confirmed by histology, to return to normal, prolonged follow up may be required to observe resolution of symptoms in functional dyspepsia. 12 13
We postulated that H pylori is a direct cause of around
20% of cases of functional dyspepsia. To test this hypothesis, we conducted a controlled trial. The study protocol was approved by the
appropriate ethics committees, and written informed consent was
obtained from the participants.
| |
Subjects and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Overall, 278 consecutive patients were recruited from 40 centres in Australia, New Zealand, and nine European countries; 244 patients (89%) were from secondary care. The remaining 31 patients (11%) were from primary care and were recruited only from the United Kingdom. Twenty centres recruited six or more patients.
Protocol
Study population
Dyspepsia was defined as pain or
discomfort centred in the upper abdomen.1 We enrolled
adult patients with dyspepsia for at least 3 months, normal endoscopic
findings, and a positive result for H pylori on a
screening test (Helisal, Cortecs Diagnostics, UK). Patients with
oesophagitis (any mucosal break), Barrett's oesophagus, gastric or
duodenal ulceration, duodenal erosions, malignancy, more than five
gastric erosions, or alarm symptoms were excluded. H2
receptor antagonists, prostaglandins, or prokinetics during the 7 days
before enrolment, or proton-pump inhibitors, antibiotics, or bismuth
during the 30 days before enrolment, were not permitted. Patients with
documented peptic ulcer disease or gastro-oesophageal reflux disease
were excluded.
After endoscopy, patients were required to fill out a diary card with scores for their symptoms during a 7 day
run-in period. Only patients who had at least 3 days of at least
moderate dyspepsia symptoms were randomised. No study drug was
dispensed during the run-in.
Treatment period
Patients underwent a breath test using
urea labelled with carbon-13 at the randomisation visit. They were randomised to receive either omeprazole 20 mg twice daily, amoxicillin 1000 mg twice daily, and clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily or placebo
for 1 week. If patients had taken at least 12 out of 14 doses of drug
or placebo they were considered to be compliant; no patients were
withdrawn from the study because of poor compliance.
Follow up period
The patients were followed up 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after cessation of treatment. Diary cards (filled out the
week before each visit) were collected at each visit, quality of life
forms were filled out by the patients at the 6 and 12 month visit, and
a urea breath test and upper endoscopy were performed at the 3 and 12 month visits. A weak antacid (with a neutralising capacity of around
13 mmol of hydrochloric acid per tablet) was dispensed at each visit
and its consumption was recorded. During follow up, patients could
receive treatment for dyspeptic symptoms from their doctor but all
drugs used were recorded.
Primary outcome measures
Patients recorded the severity of their dyspepsia symptoms on
diary cards using a validated Likert scale comprising 7 grades: none,
minimal, mild, moderate, moderately severe, severe, very
severe.14
Secondary outcome measures
The gastrointestinal symptom rating scale was used to score
dyspepsia symptoms. This validated instrument measures symptoms
including abdominal pain.
17 18
The psychological general
well being index was used to score the patients' quality of life. This
validated instrument measures subjective well being.18-20
Statistical analyses
Patients were excluded from the intention to treat analysis who
were negative for H pylori at pre-entry or who were
without any assessment of treatment efficacy after randomisation (fig
1). The treatment groups were compared for symptom relief with a
Mantel-Haenszel test stratified by country and for healing of gastritis
with a Mantel-Haenszel test stratified by baseline
gastritis.
|
level of 0.05 based on a two sided
2 test). The
placebo response was based on data for symptom turnover.21
Randomisation was in blocks of four in proportions of 1:1 according to
a computer generated list.
Identical placebos were used. Investigators and patients were blinded
to all data, including H pylori assessments after
randomisation, until the study was fully completed.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
One hundred and thirty five patients (52 men) were randomised to treatment and 143 patients (48 men) were randomised to placebo (fig 1). Three patients (two in the treatment group and one in the placebo group) were withdrawn from the analysis because of unavailability of data after randomisation.
The two groups were well balanced for demographic and clinical features (table 1).
|
Analysis
Eradication of H pylori and healing of gastritis
Both urea breath testing and histology results were available for
237 patients (86%). At 12 months, 113 patients (85%) in the treatment
arm had been successfully cured of H pylori infection
compared with 6 patients (4%) in the placebo group. However, 108 patients (81%) in the treatment group had no or mild chronic gastritis
at 12 months compared with 18 patients (13%) in the placebo group
(table 2). Overall, 98% of patients consumed at
least 12 of 14 doses in both groups.
|
Symptom relief
By an intention to treat analysis, 32 patients (24%) in the
treatment group and 31 patients (22%) in the placebo group were
successfully treated (minimal or no dyspepsia) at 12 months (table 2).
There was no significant difference in treatment success among those
who were negative for H pylori (35, 29%) and those who
remained positive for H pylori (28, 21%). At the 12 month follow up, no dyspepsia symptoms were reported by 20 patients (15%) in the treatment group and 16 patients (11%) in the placebo group. A similar proportion of patients in each treatment arm had no or
minimal dyspepsia symptoms at each follow up (fig 2). The mean symptom
score was not significantly different at each time point (fig 3). There
was no inhomogeneity among countries (Breslow-Day test,
P>0.20).
|
|
|
There was no
association between the severity of symptoms at baseline and gastritis
scores on initial biopsies. Patients at follow up were subdivided
regardless of treatment into those with a chronic gastritis score of 0 or 1 (none or mild gastritis) and those with a score of 2 or 3 (moderate or severe gastritis) in a secondary analysis. At the 12 month
follow up, 41/127 patients (32%) with no or mild gastritis were
treatment successes (no or minimal dyspepsia) compared with 21/123
patients (17%) with moderate or severe gastritis (P=0.008). This
association was not explained by age. Of the 41 patients with none or
mild gastritis at follow up, only nine had received placebo (of whom only one had complete resolution of gastritis and eight had mild gastritis).
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Few large trials have rigorously evaluated the role of H pylori eradication in functional dyspepsia, and the results are conflicting. 22 23 We found no convincing evidence that successful eradication of H pylori infection relieves or reduces symptoms in patients with functional dyspepsia over 12 months.
Trial design issues
We aimed to overcome previous methodological limitations.
8 9
In particular, the outcome measures were valid and responsive to change.
14 17-20
Scrupulous
attention was paid to blinding of patients and investigators.
Prospective assessment of symptoms reduced the issue of recall
bias.9
Predictors of symptom relief
A persistent inflammatory response could promote the development
of dyspepsia.11 We observed an association between healing
of chronic gastritis and symptom relief but this secondary analysis
requires confirmation.
A popular management strategy in
otherwise healthy young patients with uninvestigated dyspepsia is to
non-invasively test for H pylori and to treat all
infected cases.25 Although controversial, such a strategy
may have a number of potential benefits.26 On the basis of
our results, however, only a minority who are treated would be likely
to gain long term symptomatic relief, because most infected patients
with dyspepsia have functional dyspepsia rather than peptic ulcer
disease.25
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank members of the Optimal Regimen Cures Helicobacter Induced Dyspepsia Study Group: S Kiilerich, L Weywadt, U Tage-Jensen (Denmark); RJLF Loffeld, JA Beker, PWE Haeck (Netherlands); B Collins, J Karrasch, M Korman, R Watts (Australia); K Vetvik, K Hveem, J Østborg, S Wetterhus (Norway); GO Barbezat (New Zealand); A Obrador, J Viver, E Quintero, M Torres, J Hinojosa (Spain); M Rasmussen, R Grönfors, PE Wingren (Finland); J Hosie, S Rowlands, M Scott, C Stoddard, G Walker (United Kingdom); MA Bigard, D Goldfain, JY Begue, D Schmitz (France); Z Döbrönte, L Juhász, L Lakatos, Z Tulassay (Hungary). We also thank Ola Junghard, Niilo Havu, and Gudrun Sjögren from Astra Hässle, Sweden.
Contributors: NJT, JJ, KL, IR, and EB-S participated in the design, execution, and analysis of the study. NJT will act as guarantor for the paper.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Funding: Astra Hässle (Molndal, Sweden).
Competing interests: NJT has been a consultant for Astra Hässle (Sweden) and Abbott Laboratories (USA). EB-S is an employee of Astra Hässle.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
any controversies left?
Gastroenterology
1996;
110:
302-306[Medline].
positive functional dyspepsia.
Gastroenterology
1994;
106:
1174-1183[Medline].(Accepted 21 January 1999)
Read all Rapid Responses