Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Include coronary artery disease and reduced bone mineral density
The long term social impact of depressive illness
has been extensively investigated,1 but far less attention
has been paid to its physical consequences. There is, however, an
important and accumulating body of evidence to indicate that the
physical consequences of depression are far from benign. In particular, the increased risk of coronary artery disease and the impact on bone
mineral content have both received recent attention.
A 55 year prospective study that examined the relation between
mood disorder and physical health in a male population showed the
damaging effects of depression.2 Among 237 healthy men recruited at college entry and assessed at the age of 70, 45% of those
who had suffered a depressive episode were dead at follow up
compared with only 5% of those in good psychological health. The
differences in longevity could not be explained in terms of cigarette
smoking, diet, or alcohol intake. In a similar 35 year study of
1198 male university entrants Ford et al found that major depression
increased the risk of coronary artery disease, with a mean lag phase of
10 years between the report of depression and the first report of
cardiovascular disease.3 The Kuoppio ischaemic heart
disease study investigated 2428 men over six years.4 Again, among those with no prior history of cardiac disease, those who
suffered a depressive episode were at significantly greater risk of
myocardial infarction, even when all other risk factors, including
smoking, were controlled for.
The epidemiological catchment area study, performed in a cohort of 1551 healthy subjects in Baltimore, is important because it used modern
diagnostic criteria for depression.5 After an episode of
major depression the risk of myocardial infarction increased fourfold
to fivefold when other medical risk factors were controlled for.
Individuals who had subsyndromal forms of depression, but who never
fulfilled criteria for major depression, had a twofold increased risk
of myocardial infarction.
Is this increased risk of myocardial infarction after depression gender
specific? Barefoot and Schroll studied 409 men and 321 women, all
living in Glostrup, Denmark and born in 1914.6 Baseline
physical and psychiatric assessments were conducted in 1964 and 1974. The study ended in 1991, at which point there had been 290 deaths.
Depression was associated with an increased risk of myocardial
infarction, and no sex differences in effect size were observed. A
relation did exist between severity of depression and risk.
Similarly clearcut findings have been found in relation to bone mineral
density. A preliminary study in depressed patients by Schweiger et al
showed decreases in lumbar spine density measured by computed
tomography.7 A recent rigorously controlled study of a
younger patient group provided similar results.8 Twenty four women with a current or past history of major depression were
matched individually for age, body mass index, and menopausal status;
women were excluded if they had known risk factors for decreased bone
density. Bone mineral density was then measured using a dual energy
x ray absorptiometer. Women with a current or past
history of depression had decreased bone mineral density at each
trabecular bone site studied, both in absolute values and in deviations
from expected peak bone density. In the hip, for example, a decreased
density of 10-14% was found. Serum osteocalcin levels (an indicator of
bone formation) were lower in depressed women and urinary free cortisol
excretion was higher. These changes in bone density are clinically
relevant. Decreases in bone density of 10% increase hip fracture rates
by more than 40% over a 10 year period.9 Once bone
density is decreased it is difficult to re-establish, and, given the
recurrent nature of depression, these effects on bone will probably be cumulative.
The most consistently shown biological abnormality in major
depression is increased activation of the
hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. Hypercortisolism is known to
decrease bone mineral density9 and to redistribute body
fat, increasing the risk of coronary artery disease.10
Thakore et al matched women with depression who were not taking drugs
with age matched healthy controls of similar height and body mass index
and performed computed tomography, measuring the total number of pixels
of fat density.11 Intra-abdominal fat content was twice as
high in the depressed women as in the healthy controls. Increased
intra-abdominal fat is a known risk factor for coronary artery disease.
Depression is an illness with major social, psychological, and
biological consequences. Clinicians are well aware of the potential cardiac impact of tricyclic antidepressants, but for too long we have
ignored the important physical sequelae of depression itself.
Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin 2, Ireland
© BMJ 1999
Read all Rapid Responses