Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
A modest measure
with big
effects
Hospital acquired infection damages patients,
prolongs hospital stays, consumes scarce hospital resources, and thus
presents a major challenge for clinical governance.1 In a
seminal intervention study 150 years ago Semmelweis insisted that
doctors performing necropsies washed their hands before delivering
babies, so reducing mortality due to streptococcal puerperal sepsis
from 22% to 3%.2 Many studies since have confirmed that
doctors decontaminating their hands between seeing patients can reduce
hospital infection rates.3 Nevertheless, healthcare
workers still fail to wash their hands and fail to appreciate the
importance of doing so.3 This month the Department of
Health has had another attempt at reminding them by sending a document
and health circular to all NHS chief executives, public health
directors, and microbiologists in England.
Many observational studies, mainly conducted in intensive care units,
show low rates of hand washing, especially among doctors.4 Bartzokas et al observed that, despite frequent patient contacts, senior doctors washed their hands only twice during 21 hours of ward
rounds.5 Though doctors spend less time than nurses in direct patient contact and may think that they need to decontaminate their hands less often, they have many transient contacts and move from
ward to ward. The same is true for phlebotomists, physiotherapists, radiographers, and various technicians.
Self reporting overestimates compliance. After unobtrusive observation
of doctors to obtain a baseline hand washing rate, Tibballs asked a
sample to estimate their own hand washing rates before patient contact.
Their perceived rate of 73% (range 50%-95%) contrasted sharply with
the observed frequency of just 9%.6 Pritchard and Raper
were astonished that "doctors can be so extraordinarily self-delusional about their behaviour."7
Why is compliance so poor? Even when taught the theoretical basis of
hand washing, healthcare workers do not seem to understand the risks
associated with non-compliance.8 Hospital acquired infections usually present as sporadic cases, perceived as
insignificant or unrelated to non-compliance. Staff horrified by lice
on a patient fail to consider the potentially far more serious
consequences of bacteria present on their hands.
The failure of healthcare workers to decontaminate their hands reflects
fundamentals of attitudes, beliefs, and behaviour, and there are no
simple solutions. Many attempts have been made to improve hand washing
compliance through education, and indeed elementary hygiene practice
should be taught explicitly in medical schools. Principles taught in
the lecture theatre can be reinforced by experiential learning, such as
demonstrating the need for proper hand washing technique by showing
microbial growth from unwashed hands9 and by using
fluorescent oil-based dyes to illustrate the effectiveness of hand
washing. Such methods increase personal impact, but, though they may be
temporarily improve compliance, behavioural changes tend not to be maintained.
Role models are important in hospital practice. Junior doctors washed
their hands more often when consultants set an example (although they
were not perfect, washing their hands on fewer than half the indicated
occasions) (Larson and Larson, conference of Association of
Practitioners in Infection Control, San Diego, 1983). Unfortunately,
poor practice can also be learnt at the bedside. Junior staff and
students taught to wash their hands abandoned the habit when others,
especially more senior ward staff, did not bother.10
Senior staff should take the lead to achieve lasting behavioural
change. To increase compliance, medical staff could police each
other,11 and it has even been suggested that patients
should be encouraged to ask their carers to wash their hands.
It is clear that healthcare workers fail to understand the importance
of hand washing. This issue is so crucial that we need a greater
commitment from management to influence their behaviour. It is now time
for an explicit standard to be set, that hands should be decontaminated
before each patient contact. If such a policy is not in place or being
followed, the trust concerned may be liable in the event of litigation.
The culture change required for this new practice may be forbidding,
but similar challenges such as the safe disposal of sharps and, in
another setting, the use of seat belts in cars, have been faced and
overcome. Hand decontamination should have similar status to other
health and safety policies, where individuals are accountable for day
to day operational practices. Hand washing should be regarded as part
of the normal duty of care.
c/o Louise Teare, Chelmsford Public Health Laboratory,
Chelmsford CM2 0YX (L.Teare{at}btinternet.com)
Acknowledgments
* Of the Hospital Infection Society, Association of Medical Microbiologists, Department of Health, Infection Control Nurses Association, Royal College of Nursing, Public Health Laboratory Service: Barry Cookson, Gary French, Dinah Gould, Elizabeth Jenner, J McCulloch, Anne Pallett, M Schwieger, Geoffrey Scott, Jennie Wilson.
Semmelweis' heritage.
Hyg Med
1997;
22:
332-339.
Read all Rapid Responses