, reader in neuroscience.
Department of Anatomy,
University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3DY
Every day we experience profound changes in our mental and
physical condition as body and brain alternate between states of high
activity during the waking day and recuperation, rest, and repair
during night time sleep. These cycles are not a passive response to the
world around us: they are pre-adapted, driven by an internal clock. We
know this because when human volunteers are held in experimental
isolation and deprived of any temporal or social cues, they still show
daily cycles of sleep and wakefulness, in core body temperatures, and
urinary output (fig 1).
1 2
As with all biological
processes, the clock driving these cycles is slightly imperfect,
therefore the measurable rhythms free run with periods of slightly less
than or greater than one solar day, hence circadian (approximately a
day). Notwithstanding this inaccuracy, the circadian clock is extremely
robust. It is capable of continuing for several months and with a
reproducibility to within a few minutes per
cycle.
|
Summary points
Circadian timekeeping is a fundamental property of all higher
forms of life
In mammals the principal circadian mechanism lies in the individual
neurones of the suprachiasmatic nuclei
Comparative studies of the clock in mammals and fruit flies have
provided a model of autoregulatory feedback to explain its basic
properties
The genes encoding this feedback loop, and how they and their protein
products respond to synchronising cues, are being characterised
This opens the way for an understanding of how genes regulate a basic
aspect of behaviour and what are suitable targets for intervention when
this timing mechanism breaks down
|

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig 1.
Most aspects of physiology and behaviour are
governed by a central clock mechanism in the hypothalamus. The clock
acts on neural and endocrine pathways to regulate individual circadian
rhythms so that internal state varies predictably over 24 hours. This
enables adaption to daily and seasonal environment and enhances
efficiency by separating anabolic and catabolic processes in time
|
|
 |
The clock in our brain: the suprachiasmatic nuclei |
In humans and other mammals the primary body clock is located in
the suprachiasmatic nuclei, a cluster of around 10 000 neurones located on either side of the midline above the optic chiasma, about
3 cm behind the eyes.
3 4
If these nuclei are destroyed, either experimentally in animals or as a result of disease in humans
for example, compression by expanding pituitary tumours
the ability to express any overt circadian rhythms is destroyed. The temporal programme of behaviour and physiology is scrambled.
In experimental animals with such ablation, central grafting of
neonatal hypothalamic tissue containing the suprachiasmatic nuclei can
restore circadian patterning to the activity-rest cycle. Not only is
this compelling evidence that the clock is an autonomous property of
the suprachiasmatic nuclei, it is also an excellent example of the
restoration of function by neural grafting. Also, when neonatal
suprachiasmatic nucleic tissue is dissociated and held in vitro, the
individual neurones show robust circadian rhythms of electrical firing,
each of them with a slightly different period from its neighbours as
they free run in the culture dish.5 The circadian
mechanism is therefore autonomous in cells, and the clock is so
powerful that the rhythms of a single neurone can be recorded
continuously for several weeks with only the slightest deviation from
24 hours.
 |
Circadian clock molecules in flies |
The expression of circadian timing in individual neurones shows
that it is not an emergent property of a neural circuitry or system but
an integral feature of the biochemistry of the cells. An early
indication that the machinery is specified genetically came from
studies of the circadian rhythms of cortisol secretion in twins, but as
in so many other biomedical fields, the real impetus to molecular
genetic analysis of the clock has come from fruit flies (Drosophila
spp). By analysing the circadian patterns of activity and emergence
from the pupal case of mutant flies, several genes have been identified
that encode essential elements of the clock.
6 7
Mutations
of these genes can either speed up or slow down the clock, giving flies
with days of 20 or 28 hours. Alternatively, mutations can destroy
altogether the ability of a fly to be rhythmic.
|
Fig 2.
Circadian clock molecules in drosophila.
Early cycle: Expression of the clock genes period (per) and timeless
(tim) is stimulated by the factors Bmal and Clock (blue/green circles).
As cytoplasmic concentrations of per mRNA increase, Period protein
(Per) is produced (red circles). Initially it is unstable and degraded.
Mid-cycle: As the concentrations of Per and Timeless (Tim) proteins
increase, the proteins form heterodimers (red and grey clusters), which
enter the nucleus and suppress the expression of per and tim genes.
Late cycle: Transcription of the genes is halted. With time Per and Tim
proteins are inactivated, and without mRNA no new proteins can be
produced. Consequently, Bmal and Clock are able to exert their
stimulatory actions and the cycle begins again after about 24 hours
|
|
The proteins encoded by these genes are components of a self sustaining
negative feedback loop, which is now thought to form the driving
oscillation of the timing system.8 Period (Per) and
Timeless (Tim) proteins move around the cell, their abundance and
location defining circadian time (fig 2). The genes encoding these
proteins (per and tim respectively) are active in the early part of the
night, producing mRNA; proteins start to accumulate later in the night.
Initially the proteins are rapidly degraded within the cytoplasm,
especially Per. However, the Per protein has a specialised binding
site, which enables it to associate with Tim as heterodimers. These
dimers are much more resistant to degradation, and in the act of
association, surfaces of the protein that hold Per in the cytoplasm are
obscured and the dimers become able to enter the nucleus. This is a key
event because these clock proteins have another property
they can
control the activity of various genes. Expression of the per and tim
genes is suppressed by their own dimerised protein products, closing the feedback loop. As a result, once the dimers gain access to the
nucleus, the clock genes are turned off and no new clock mRNA or
protein is synthesised. After a lag the existing proteins in the
nucleus start to be broken down and the genes are released from
inhibition to become active again and reinitiate the cycle. Because of
the long lags between gene activation and turn off, the whole sequence
takes about 24 hours and is self sustaining.
|
Scanning electron micrograph of a mutant fruit fly with leg
antennae
|
|
 |
Circadian clock molecules in mammals |
Studies in mammals have advanced our understanding of the clock
mechanism in two ways.
Firstly, the human and mouse equivalents of the drosophila per gene
have now been identified,
7 8 9
and studies showing the
presence of mammalian tim are likely to be published in the next few
months. The parallels between the fly and mammalian forms of the genes
show that evolution has conserved not only the property of circadian
timing but also its molecular basis, indicating how deeply the clock is
entrenched in our make up.
Secondly, molecular genetic approaches have revealed another pair of
essential clock parts. What the feedback model of drosophila does not
explain is why removal of inhibition would be followed by gene switch
on
in other words, what positive factors are responsible for
activating per and tim when the heterodimer proteins are inactivated? These positive factors have now been identified as the Clock and Bmal
proteins: positive transcriptional regulators which act together to
stimulate the per and tim genes.10 Mutations of clock in mice and of the equivalent genes in drosophila ablate circadian rhythmicity, probably because the per and tim genes need this positive
drive to trigger a new cycle. In its absence the clock is unwound.
As might be expected, the mammalian per genes, clock, and bmal are all
expressed in the suprachiasmatic nuclei, but whereas the genes encoding
Clock and Bmal are turned on permanently, expression of the per gene is
rhythmic, being highest in the middle of the day and suppressed at
later stages of the cycle. The assumption is that the inactivation
reflects the negative feedback of Per (and possibly Tim) proteins
antagonising the positive drive from Clock and Bmal, just as it does in drosophila.
But unravelling the workings of the clock does not stop there
the most
recent gene to be identified in flies, double-time, encodes a kinase
enzyme thought to be responsible for phosphorylation of Per
protein.11 Mutation of double-time in flies speeds up the
clock because without phosphorylation the breakdown of Per protein in
the cytoplasm is attenuated. This allows Per concentrations to rise
faster, thereby shortening the lag between gene activation and the
entry of heterodimer proteins into the nucleus. This illustrates the
important point that the integrity and speed of the core oscillation of
the clock depends on several intracellular events
that is, the
clock's biochemical context. Many factors independent of the core
oscillation might be manipulated to affect circadian timing, and these,
rather than the core oscillator itself, may be more suitable targets
for both experimental and therapeutic purposes.
 |
Synchronising body time |
How can internal time based on the Per-Tim loop be synchronised to
the outside world? In flies light seems to destabilise the heterodimers
by breaking down Tim.7 In mice, however, light acts
through the retina and direct neural pathways to the suprachiasmatic nuclei to stimulate per gene expression. Perturbations by light can
advance or delay the clock, depending on the stage at which a new pulse
of Per is injected into the ongoing cycle. Under normal circumstances
this ensures that small daily adjustments to the clock around dawn and
dusk are sufficient to keep it tightly synchronised to the
environment.
1 2
In addition, our habits may affect the
clock independently of light because recent work has shown that applied
schedules of physical activity can alter circadian period. Although the
neural pathways mediating these non-photic effects are being mapped,
how arousal might affect the behaviour of clock molecules in the
suprachiasmatic nuclei is not known. Nevertheless, these findings have
important therapeutic considerations in situations where the clock is
desynchronised
for example, in jet lag, shift work, and particular
forms of depression.12
Firstly, resetting can proceed only at a rate of around 1-2 hours a
day, so it may well take the clock the best part of a week to adapt to
a reversed shift pattern. While the readjustment occurs, the
unfortunate person may be expected to perform demanding mental and
physical tasks at a time when the clock is driving reaction times and
mental performance to their nocturnal nadir.13
Secondly, the recognition of the potency of non-photic resetting
stimuli adds to the potential range of compounds that might be
convenient "chronotherapeutics"
that is, compounds useful for regularising clock function. The pineal hormone melatonin is one such
compound.12 Synthetic derivatives are now being tested clinically and may prove to be useful as alternatives to
benzodiazepines in managing sleep disorders.
 |
How many circadian clocks are there? |
Recent work in drosophila has shown that when they are excised and
cultured in isolation many tissues continue to express circadian
patterns in their biochemistry, some tissues being directly photoresponsive.14 A fly's body therefore consists of a
series of independent clocks, which must in life be synchronised by
endocrine, neural, and other linkages. Until recently, the view for
higher vertebrates was that the principal clock structures are the
lateral eyes, the pineal organ, and the suprachiasmatic nuclei, with
the suprachiasmatic nuclei being predominant in
mammals.
3 4
However, when mammalian cell lines were first
deprived of serum and then exposed to a high concentration of serum
with all of its rich soup of signalling factors, the cells in culture
very quickly turned on a large number of genes, among them mammalian
per.9 This wave of gene expression then subsided, a
typical response to serum. On continued sampling, however, the
investigators found that after one, two, and even three circadian
periods after serum stimulation, the cultures spontaneously turned on
per and some other genes.9 This showed that cultures of
immortalised cell lines, which had been held in the laboratory for 25 years, had the capacity to express endogenous free running circadian
cycles.
This landmark study opens up an enormous range of opportunities and
questions, not the least of which is whether every cell in our body has
the potential to be a circadian clock. If so, how do they talk to each other?
 |
A longer term view of biological time? |
The daily clock is crucial for longer term processes in many
animals. Migration, hibernation, fattening, and fur growth are all
adaptations to winter, while the annual rut of large animals and the
summer population explosion of smaller ones are all cued, months in
advance, by the change in day length. The circadian clock is central to
this effect because the signal it gives out changes its shape to
reflect the longer nights of winter.2 As a result, the
nocturnal peak of melatonin secretion by the pineal gland, which is
tightly controlled by the suprachiasmatic nuclei, provides an internal
endocrine calendar. A lengthening melatonin signal from night to night
indicates the season is moving through autumn to winter, while
progressive shortening means the worst of winter may soon be
over.15
So the daily clock provides an endocrine calendar, but is it important
for humans? There are certainly reports of seasonal changes in mood,
especially winter depression with atypical features of increased
appetite and amelioration by bright artificial lighting,12 but for most of us our physiology remains almost immune to season. However, recent studies have shown that the photoperiodic timing system
may be latent in our bodies, especially for sleep.16 Human
subjects held in isolation under a summer-like long day length have a
single consolidated nocturnal sleep bout, a sharply defined core body
temperature minimum, and a short melatonin signal. When the nights are
prolonged, the melatonin profile lengthens, sleep breaks into two
components at the beginning and end of the night, with an intervening
interval of quiet wakefulness, and the nocturnal nadir of the core body
temperature rhythm either broadens or shifts phase towards one or other
sleep interval. This vestigial seasonal reorganisation of the circadian
temporal programme is probably not of great importance to most of us
living a modern life. However, the subjective descriptions of the quiet wakefulness, with the mind hovering back and forth between dream-filled sleep and conscious awareness suggest a deep psychological resonance with season which may underlie seasonal changes in normal and disordered mood. Perhaps we do all have a primitive need, driven by our
clock, to turn down the lights, put another log on the fire, and sit
back and rest, waiting for the winter to pass.
 |
References |
-
Aschoff J.
Handbook of behavioural neurobiology. Vol 4. Biological rhythms.
New York: Plenum
, 1981.
-
Pittendrigh CS.
Temporal organisation: reflections of a Darwinian clock-watcher.
Annu Rev Physiol
1993;
55:
16-54[Medline].
-
Hastings MH.
Central clocking.
Trends Neurosci
1997;
20:
459-464[Medline].
-
Klein DC, Moore RY, Reppert SM.
Suprachiasmatic nucleus: the mind's clock.
New York: Oxford University Press
, 1991.
-
Welsh DK, Logothetis DE, Meister M, Reppert SM.
Individual neurons dissociated from rat suprachiasmatic nucleus express independently phased circadian firing rhythms.
Neuron
1995;
14:
697-706[Medline].
-
Hall JC.
Genetics of circadian rhythms.
Annu Rev Genet
1990;
24:
659-697[Medline].
-
Rosato E, Piccin A, Kyriacou CP.
Molecular analysis of circadian behaviour.
Bioessays
1997;
19:
1075-1082[Medline].
-
Reppert SM.
A clockwork explosion!
Neuron
1998;
21:
1-4[Medline].
-
Balsalobre A, Damiola F, Schibler U.
A serum shock induces circadian gene expression in mammalian tissue culture cells.
Cell
1998;
93:
929-937[Medline].
-
Gekakis N, Stalonis D, Nguyen HB, Davis FC, Wilsbacher LD, King DP, et al.
Role of the CLOCK protein in the mammalian circadian mechanism.
Science
1998;
280:
1564-1569[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Price JL, Blau J, Rothenfluh A, Abodeely M, Kloss B, Young MW.
double-time is a new Drosophila clock gene that regulates PERIOD protein accumulation.
Cell
1998;
94:
83-95[Medline].
-
Arendt J.
Melatonin and the mammalian pineal gland.
In:
London: Chapman and Hall
, 1995.
-
Smith L, Folkard S, Poole CJM.
Increased injuries on night-shift.
Lancet
1994;
344:
1137-1139[Medline].
-
Plautz JD, Kaneko M, Hall JC, Kay SA.
Independent photoreceptive circadian clocks throughout Drosophila.
Science
1997;
278:
1632-1635[Abstract/Free Full Text].
-
Hastings MH, Maywood ES, Ebling FJP.
The role of the circadian system in photoperiodic time measurement in mammals.
NATO Advanced Studies Institute Series A
1995;
277:
95-106..
-
Wehr T.
The durations of human melatonin secretion and sleep respond to changes in daylength (photoperiod).
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
1991;
73:
1276-1280[Abstract].
© BMJ 1998