BMJ 1998;317:1450 ( 21 November )

Letters

Magnetic resonance imaging may be alternative to necropsy

EDITOR---Certification of the cause of death is a valuable source of information about illness in the community. When a death is unexplained the case is referred to the coroner in England and Wales and the procurator fiscal in Scotland. Although Scottish law does not demand explanation of a non-suspicious death, in England a cause of death (or mode of death under certain circumstances) must be determined, which often requires a necropsy.

Necropsy is not allowed by many religions, particularly Islam and Judaism, unless demanded by law. Over the past 18 months we have used magnetic resonance imaging to examine 15 patients whose deaths were unexplained. The patients were from areas in the North West region covered by five coroners. Examination of the brain, thorax, and upper abdomen showed that 10 of the patients had disease that was so severe that, had the patients been alive, they would have been at risk of death. In these cases the coroners accepted the magnetic resonance diagnoses as the cause of death. In the other five cases disease was found but was not deemed to be sufficiently severe to be the definite cause of death. As there was uncertainty about the cause a necropsy was done. In four of the five cases necropsy confirmed that the disease shown by magnetic resonance imaging was the cause of death.

Necropsy will always be the standard for determining cause of death, particularly as magnetic resonance imaging cannot show small vessel coronary artery disease. However, for patients whose religious beliefs make necropsy unwelcome magnetic resonance imaging may offer a reasonable alternative. The cost and availability of magnetic resonance imaging will prevent its widespread use. There is also a good chance that imaging will fail to show the cause of death and a necropsy will be required. Despite these drawbacks radiological investigations may be as valuable in death as they are in life.

Rob Bisset, Consultant radiologist .
X Ray Department, North Manchester General Hospital, Manchester M8 6RB


© BMJ 1998

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Article

Risk of myocardial infarction in patients taking cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors or conventional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: population based nested case-control analysis
Julia Hippisley-Cox and Carol Coupland
BMJ 2005 330: 1366. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Dirnhofer, R., Jackowski, C., Vock, P., Potter, K., Thali, M. J. (2006). VIRTOPSY: Minimally Invasive, Imaging-guided Virtual Autopsy. RadioGraphics 26: 1305-1333 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Hippisley-Cox, J., Coupland, C. (2005). Risk of myocardial infarction in patients taking cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors or conventional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: population based nested case-control analysis. BMJ 330: 1366- [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Griffiths, P. D., Variend, D., Evans, M., Jones, A., Wilkinson, I. D., Paley, M. N. J., Whitby, E. (2003). Postmortem MR Imaging of the Fetal and Stillborn Central Nervous System. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 24: 22-27 [Abstract] [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Islam and Autopsy
Mouied Alashari
bmj.com, 23 Nov 1998 [Full text]
Magnetic Resonance Imaging may be alternative to necropsy
Jas Brookes
bmj.com, 3 Dec 1998 [Full text]
Magnetic resonance imaging may be alternative to necropsy
Laszlo Szabo
bmj.com, 13 Jan 1999 [Full text]
Re: Islam and Autopsy
Sohail Ahmed Dar, et al.
bmj.com, 18 Mar 2006 [Full text]



Student BMJ

Intimate examinations

Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.

www.student.bmj.com

Listen to the latest BMJ Interview