Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Murray Lough a Airdrie Health Centre, Monkscourt Avenue,
Airdrie ML6 0JU, b Clinical Research
Initiative in Heart Failure, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, c Bailleston Health Centre, Glasgow G69 7AD, d Queen's
Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, e Clydebank Health Centre,
Glasgow G81 2TQ
Correspondence to: Dr Lough
Administrator{at}gp61023.lanark_hb.scot.nhs.uk
Less than 50% of patients with heart failure in
community practice receive an angiotensin converting enzyme
inhibitor and then only usually at the instigation of or when
prescribed by a hospital doctor.1-3 Fear of side effects
seems to be a barrier to starting treatment with angiotensin converting
enzyme inhibitors,
3 4
reflecting the lack of
substantial studies to show the safety of giving them in primary care.
General practitioners in 47 practices in the United
Kingdom recruited patients with mild to moderate heart failure who had been receiving chronic diuretic treatment. Exclusion criteria were age
>80 years, frusemide dose >100 mg/day, systolic arterial pressure <100 mm Hg, serum creatinine concentration
>250 µmol/l, and sodium concentration <135 mmol/l.
Plasma concentrations of N-terminal atrial natriuretic peptide were
measured from blood samples taken before randomisation at a core
laboratory.5 Plasma concentrations >2.8 ng/ml indicated important cardiac dysfunction.6
Patients were randomised, double blind, to receive quinapril 5 mg or
placebo. Blood pressure was monitored for 3 hours. Quinapril or
matching placebo was subsequently titrated over 3 days to 20 mg/day. After 1 week patients were reassessed and then, without breaking blinded-treatment, all received 5 mg of quinapril. Patients were again
monitored, titrated to 20 mg of open label quinapril, and reviewed
after a further week.
The original intention was to recruit 1000 patients giving a 95%
probability of observing any adverse event with a frequency >0.34%.
The power of the study was reduced because only 178 patients were
randomised, 96 of whom received placebo initially. The study was
terminated because of slow recruitment. Plasma concentrations of NT-ANP
are shown in the figure.
![]()
Methods and results
Top
Methods and results
Comment
References

View larger version (26K):
[in a new window]
N-terminal atrial natriuretic peptide (NT-ANP) versus age in
study population. Lower line (2.8 ng/ml) indicates optimal value for
distinguishing between patients with and without major left ventricular
systolic dysfunction (ejection fraction
30%) in a population
survey6; upper line (4.8 ng/ml) is median in study.
Assays in this study and from the population survey were performed in
the same laboratory
No serious adverse events occurred within 24 hours of starting
quinapril. Blood pressure fell to a nadir of 133/78 mm Hg in patients
receiving quinapril and 138/82 mm Hg in those receiving placebo at
2 hours post dose. Eleven patients (13.4%) randomised to receive
quinapril and 5 (5.2%) receiving placebo had an asymptomatic fall in
systolic blood pressure >20 mm Hg or to <90 mm Hg (all predefined). After one week serum creatinine concentration did not
differ from baseline (112 µmol/l (interquartile range
98-122 µmol/l) with quinapril and 110 µmol/l (92-120 µmol/l)
with placebo).
| |
Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This is the first placebo controlled clinical trial reporting the safety of starting angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors in primary care for selected patients with heart failure. Although the study was stopped prematurely because of slow recruitment (which may reflect continuing safety concerns), a frequency of serious adverse events of >2% (one in 50 initiations) was excluded. Furthermore, monitoring blood pressure after the first dose of quinapril seems unnecessary in appropriately selected patients.
The certainty of the diagnosis of heart failure in this study is of
concern but the aim was to reflect the usual clinical setting. Access
to echocardiography is limited and only the minority of patients
undergo echocardiography.2 Although diuretics that lower
plasma concentrations of atrial natriuretic peptide were used,6 76% of patients had concentrations of N-terminal
atrial natriuretic peptide that seem diagnostic of important
ventricular dysfunction in epidemiological studies.7 This
implies that general practitioners identified patients with cardiac
dysfunction reasonably accurately in this study, although precise
identification of the cause of dysfunction still requires
echocardiography.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
Funding: All drugs for the study were supplied by Warner-Lambert Pharmaceuticals.
Conflict of interest: None.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(Accepted 28 April 1998)
Read all Rapid Responses