Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
George Davey Smith a Department
of Social Medicine, Canynge Hall, Bristol BS8 2PR, b Department
of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London
WC1E 6BT, c Department of Epidemiology and Population Health,
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT
Correspondence to: Professor Davey Smith zetkin{at}bristol.ac.uk
Experiments in animals have shown that energy intake during
the growth period is positively associated with the later incidence of
cancer.1 Recently, direct evidence of an association
between childhood energy intake and adult mortality from cancer among humans was published in a report from the Boyd Orr cohort
study.2 Childhood energy intake was positively associated
with mortality from cancers not related to smoking, whereas there was
no association between energy intake and mortality from cancers related
to smoking.2 This is to be expected as the substantial
effects of tobacco would mask any effects of childhood diet on cancers
related to smoking.
Height has been used in previous studies as a marker for energy intake
in childhood,3 with the limited evidence indicating a
positive association for some cancer sites.
3 4 5
In the Boyd Orr study data were not available on smoking behaviour and were limited on adulthood socioeconomic position.2 We
therefore analysed the association between height and mortality
from cancer in a large cohort of men for whom detailed data on
socioeconomic position in adulthood and on smoking behaviour were
available.
In the Whitehall study of London civil servants, data on
employment grade, height, and smoking behaviour were available for 17 378 men aged 40-64 who were examined between 1967 and
1969.4 During follow up until 31 January 1995, 2226 of
these men died of cancer: 725 from cancers unrelated to smoking and
1501 from cancers related to smoking. To adjust for the potential
confounding effects of other variables proportional hazards analyses
were carried out with height as a continuous variable and age (in age bands of five years), employment grade (administrative, professional and executive, clerical, other), and smoking behaviour (cigarette smoker, pipe or cigar smoker, ex-cigarette smoker, and number of
cigarettes smoked per day for current cigarette smokers) as covariates.
![]()
Subjects, methods, and results
Top
Subjects, methods, and results
Comment
References
The table shows relative death rates from cancer by height category and
for each increment of 6 inches in height (1 inch is about 2.5 cm). For
cancers unrelated to smoking the association with height was positive
and strengthened by adjustment for socioeconomic position (indexed by
employment grade) and smoking behaviour. For cancers related to smoking
the association between height and mortality was negative but not
significant. Adjustment for socioeconomic position and smoking
behaviour reversed the direction of the association, but it remained
small and non-significant. As expected, cigarette smoking was strongly
associated with cancers classified as smoking related but not with
cancers classified as unrelated to smoking. The age adjusted relative
rates for height and the smoking unrelated and smoking related cancers
were significantly different (P=0.002). Exclusion of mortality
occurring during the first five or first ten years of follow up did not
materially alter these findings.
| |
Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our findings parallel those relating childhood energy intake to
cancer mortality in the Boyd Orr cohort study, in which the positive
association between childhood energy intake and subsequent risk of
cancer was also confined to cancers unrelated to smoking.2 Most previous studies have either grouped all cancers together or
looked only at individual cancers. However, consistent with our
results, the physicians health study found a positive association of
height with all malignant neoplasms but not with lung
cancer.5 In line with extensive animal experimental
evidence,1 therefore, our data and those from the Boyd Orr
study2 suggest that energy intake during growth may be an
important determinant of later risk of developing cancer. Since height
serves as only an indirect and comparatively weak proxy measure of
dietary intake in childhood, the size of the association found in this
study may reflect a much stronger underlying association with directly
measured childhood energy intake.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
Contributors: The idea for this paper came from a discussion between the authors. GDS wrote the first draft of the manuscript around analyses performed by MS, and all authors contributed to the final draft. GDS is guarantor for the study.
Funding: None.
Conflict of interest: None.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(Accepted 16 June 1998)
Read all Rapid Responses