Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Sleep and teamwork matter as much as hours in reducing doctors' stress
For every complex problem there is a simple solution
... and it's wrong H L
Mencken
Many studies show that the quality of patient care
can be severely affected by the stress levels of clinical staff,
particularly doctors.1 We know too that doctors suffer
high levels of stress and depression,2 more so than other
workers.3 Strategies aimed at resolving the working
difficulties of British doctors in training have been concerned
primarily with the long, often excessive, hours worked. Following tough
central directives and hard work by local task forces, many doctors now
work fewer hours than five years ago. Has this reduced stress
levels Hours of work are easy to measure and as a strategy of stress reduction
reducing them has an attractive logic. However, very little evidence
confirms a relation between the number of hours worked and the level of
stress or depression experienced.1 Moreover, other factors
cause junior doctors greater stress than hours alone The causes of stress are clearly more complex than this focus on hours
implies. Research in other workers suggests that loss of sleep rather
than long hours of work is the problem, causing decrements in mood
and performance,1 and this has also been confirmed
in doctors.6-7 The quality of sleep is also
important, and evidence shows that this is inferior in those on
call, expecting to be woken, who show greater sleepiness the following
day.8 Thus traditional approaches to the demands of
patient care, relying on long periods of on call But the experience of stress is not only a reaction to harmful external
influences: stressors are counteracted by positive aspects of work,
such as support from colleagues and seniors. Senior doctors often
underestimate the impact they have on the working lives of their
juniors. For example, the more time consultants dedicate to supervision
and training, including feedback and appraisal, the more satisfied
junior doctors are with their posts.9
We also know that membership of a well functioning team Thus coherent teamwork is crucial for the delivery of good quality
patient care both directly in terms of efficient and effective services, and indirectly via its effects on reducing stress. Apart from
their opportunities for support and supervision, teams are micro-organisations that are capable of innovative approaches to making
on call commitments both practicable and bearable Established patterns of working that did well enough when demands were
less intense are not appropriate for current health care: new working
practices need to respond to changes such as shorter patient stays,
increased ambulatory care, and heightened patient expectations.
Individual solutions will depend on local circumstances, but there are
innovative examples of teamwork patterns that minimise sleep
deprivation by looking at the whole context of patient
care.11 Most solutions require collaboration between managers, doctors, nurses, and other professions. For example, many of
the tasks and questions about patient care at night can and should be
done by staff other than doctors.12 Rotas and on call
commitments need to be organised in the context of the daily activity
of the team. Outpatient clinics, endoscopy lists, and routine
surgery need not be scheduled to coincide with a team's responsibilities for emergency care. And on call commitments for emergencies should be understood as a 48 hour commitment These solutions are all a matter of good organisational practice.
Hospitals have a duty to provide a culture and structure in which good
teams can flourish, perhaps using protocols for their management and
development in much the same way as they would apply protocols for
the management of patient care. Consultants are crucial in this
process; they need to appreciate their potential influence Centre for Clinical Psychology Research, University of
Northumbria at Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 8ST
(j.firth-cozens{at}unn.ac.uk) North Thames, Thames Postgraduate Medical and Dental Education,
London WC1 N3J
or is there more to be done?
for example,
difficult relationships with senior doctors.4 Not
surprisingly therefore recent studies show stress levels to be still
high,3 training adversely affected, and satisfaction with
new shift systems far from positive.5
and broken
sleep
are no longer sustainable.
one with clear
team and individual goals, that meets together often, and that values
the diverse skills of its members
reduces stress levels and increases
performance.10 The ability to create such a team may not
always come naturally, and the white papers' identification of team
leadership skills as part of clinical governance is encouraging.
perhaps even
fulfilling.
the day of and the day after "take." Moreover, work patterns may
need to respond to the experience
or inexperience
of team members: Do
consultants, for example, reduce their or their registrars' clinic
lists in order to support the new preregistration house officers in
that first week in August?
both
positive and negative
on stress experienced by doctors in training.
But they also need the authority, the skills, and the time to work with
other healthcare professionals, including senior nurses, to develop and
nurture coherent and functioning multiprofessional clinical teams. Such
teams need to be aware of all the responsibilities of a unit and,
with knowledge of each other's work, develop ways of working together
and supporting each other. The best ways will vary between hospitals
and specialties, and the organisational changes will be more taxing
than simply changing rotas to meet new limits on doctors' hours.
But unless the work of doctors is understood in the context of
supportive teams, future generations of doctors will be as stressed
as their predecessors. The focus on hours has been an important first
step, but now it is time to develop more innovative ways to improve the
quality of work for doctors and other health professionals
and with it
the quality of patient care.
Fiona Moss
© BMJ 1998