Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
D H Stone a Paediatric Epidemiology and Community Health
Unit, Department of Child Health, University of Glasgow Yorkhill,
Glasgow G3 8SJ, b Departments of
Statistics and Public Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8RZ
Correspondence
to: Dr Stone D.H.Stone{at}clinmed.gla.ac.uk
Recent reports from England and Wales1 and
Scotland2 imply that a gradient of increasing risk of
congenital abdominal wall defects may exist from the south to the north
of the United Kingdom. We tested this hypothesis by comparing data from
a validated public health surveillance system in the west of Scotland
with other registers in the United Kingdom.
3 4
The Glasgow Register of Congenital Anomalies is a computerised
epidemiological database run by the Greater Glasgow Health Board since
1974. A member of the transnational network of EUROCAT (European
Registration of Congenital Anomalies) since 1980, it uses multiple
sources of ascertainment and subjects all notified anomalies to
systematic diagnostic validation. Completed registration forms are
transmitted electronically to the EUROCAT central registry in Brussels,
where they are checked for completeness and accuracy of
coding.3 There is no formal time limit for notification. All births and induced abortions following prenatal diagnosis are
included in the surveillance. Diagnostic coding is based on the British
Paediatric Association's extension to the ninth revision of the
International Classification of Diseases.
The numerators were all registered cases of omphalocele (code 75670)
and gastroschisis (code 75671) in mothers resident within the area
covered by the Greater Glasgow Health Board at the time of delivery;
cases were included that occurred in live births, still births, and
induced abortions for 1980-93 inclusive. Induced abortions were counted
in the year of the expected date of delivery had the pregnancy
continued. The denominators were the total births to mothers in the
area in the relevant time period. Prevalence was calculated by dividing
the numbers for each defect by total births. Prevalences were compared
using During the study there were 73 cases of omphalocele (4.08 per 10 000
births), of which 34 (47%) were induced abortions, and 24 cases of
gastroschisis (1.34 per 10 000 births), of which 5 (21%) were induced
abortions. The apparently high prevalence of abdominal wall defects in
Glasgow relative to other parts of the United Kingdom was due to its
exceptionally high rate of omphalocele (table).
Our data support the hypothesis of an increasing gradient in the
prevalence of congenital anterior abdominal wall defects from the south
to the north of the United Kingdom. Whether the phenomenon is real or
artefactual (due to varying ascertainment) remains uncertain. In
Glasgow the risk of omphalocele seems especially high. The prevalence
of omphalocele in our study is about four times higher than that
reported by the Office for National Statistics for England and Wales.
However, this striking discrepancy may reflect substantial
underascertainment by the Office for National Statistics of cases of
omphalocele.4 In particular, these national data excluded
terminations of pregnancy following prenatal diagnosis, whereas almost
half of the cases in our series were terminated. Data from EUROCAT for
1980-92 indicate that the ratio of omphalocele to gastroschisis was
2.5,3 a value much closer to that of Glasgow (3.0) than
that of the Office for National Statistics (0.8). By contrast, the
prevalence of gastroschisis in Glasgow is comparable with that of the
area covered by the Office for National Statistics, particularly its
northern and western regions.
The reported gradient from south to north in the prevalence of
abdominal wall defects (especially omphalocele) in the United Kingdom
and in Europe as a whole5 is similar to that observed for
neural tube defects and could reflect a common aetiology. Further work
is needed to determine the relative influence of ascertainment,
maternal factors (such as age, socioeconomic group, and smoking), and
underlying secular trends on these geographical variations.
![]()
Subjects, methods, and results
Top
Subjects, methods, and results
Comment
References
2 tests, and ratios of omphalocele to
gastroschisis using a
2 test for heterogeneity of odds
ratios.
![]()
Comment
Top
Subjects, methods, and results
Comment
References
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank Mrs Hilary Miller and Dr John Womersley of the department of public health, Greater Glasgow Health Board, for their help and support in collating and analysing data from the Glasgow Register of Congenital Anomalies. The EUROCAT network is supported by the European Commission.
Contributors: DHS initiated the study, helped plan the methods, and participated in the analysis, in interpreting data, and in writing the paper. SR helped to conceive the study, collated the data, and contributed to the analysis and writing the paper as part of a wider project on the epidemiology of abdominal wall defects. WHG contributed to methodological aspects of the study, including the analysis, presentation, and interpretation of the results. DHS is guarantor for the study.
Funding: None.
Conflict of interest: None.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(Accepted 27 March 1998)
Read all Rapid Responses