Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Why was no control group studied?
EDITOR What is the prevalence of abnormal results of pulmonary function tests
in their general population? If it is high, with a prevalence
approaching the prevalence found in their population of patients with
cough, an alternative conclusion might be that asthma and chronic
obstructive pulmonary disease are common and not significantly more
common in the population of patients with cough. I encourage Thiadens
et al to examine their study group further. One issue deserving
scrutiny is whether these patients are still coughing after six months.
Also, what diagnoses (if any) apply to the remaining (54%) patients
with cough, and does their prognosis differ from that of the group
diagnosed as having asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease?
Finally, how do these patients respond to different treatments?
a
shirl{at}netvision.net.il
Children with cough alone should not be labelled asthmatic
EDITOR The authors did not report on the repeatability of their question on
cough. The repeatability of such questions is poor, and subjective
reporting of cough is unreliable.3 In patients with asthma
and cough, the cough is usually worse at night, but in this study
nocturnal cough did not reach significance as a current or a past
symptom. The percentage of the patients with asthma or chronic
obstructive pulmonary disease may have been high because of the
definition used.
The authors also ignored increasing evidence that cough alone is a poor
marker of asthma in both epidemiological and clinical studies.
4 5
When they used their devised score the
probability of asthma (despite the definition) or chronic obstructive
pulmonary disease in a patient with a cough and another symptom was
0.13-0.26. Thus theoretically up to eight of every 10 patients with a
cough do not have asthma. Emphasising that most patients with a cough have asthma will prompt doctors to label these patients as having the
disease, and escalating doses of corticosteroids will be used when the
cough does not subside. The cost to the patient and the community could
be considerable.
Although the study was of adults, there is a general tendency to
extrapolate such data to children. We believe that the paper should be
qualified with a statement that most children with the symptom of cough
alone do not have asthma.
3 5
Indeed, the only published
randomised placebo controlled study that used an objective measurement
for cough (a cough meter) showed that inhaled salbutamol and
corticosteroids did not confer any additional benefit when compared
with placebo for children with cough.4
Authors' reply
EDITOR Our population was not a general population, since they attended a
general practitioner with a troublesome cough, which is not the case in
population studies. In clinical medicine virtually all people with
asthma show airway hyperresponsiveness (PD20 We agree with Chang and Masters that in children with persistent cough
overtreatment with inhaled corticosteroids is not uncommon in tertiary
clinical practice. Misdiagnosis of asthma may also occur in adults in
tertiary centres,3 but in general practice underdiagnosis
is probably more frequent than overdiagnosis in coughing
patients.4 It is dangerous to generalise findings from
tertiary centres to primary care, since the prevalence of diseases in
these settings differs. To avoid misdiagnosis, objective pulmonary
function testing is necessary so that results of (methacholine) provocation tests are available to improve the diagnostic possibilities in general practice.
It was not our purpose even to suggest that most adults with asthma or
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease have cough as the predominant
symptom. We tried to find the key features to identify those with these
disorders in a sample of patients with a persistent cough. Thus we
agree with Chang and Masters that persistent cough as an isolated
symptom has low predictive value for a diagnosis of asthma. These
authors state that nocturnal cough did not significantly contribute in
our study because of the definitions used. This might be an
explanation, but nocturnal cough is a bad predictor of asthma not only
in adults but in children as well.5
Thiadens et al examined 192 patients presenting to their general
practitioner with persistent cough
a common and challenging problem in
primary care
and found a high prevalence of asthma (39%) and chronic
obstructive pulmonary disease (7%).1 I was disappointed
that they did not provide a control group of asymptomatic subjects in
the community.
5 Amatzia Street, German Colony, Jerusalem, Israel
Thiadens et al devised a score to estimate the probability of
asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in patients who present
in general practice with persistent cough1 and report that
adults with asthma may present with cough, as McFadden reported in
1975.2 They state that the possibility of asthma or
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is rarely considered in patients
with a cough, but in the past decade the symptom of cough alone has
been increasingly used to diagnose asthma3-5 and has led
to children with cough receiving overtreatment with high doses of
inhaled or oral corticosteroids. In a tertiary clinical practice it is
not uncommon to see children who have received escalating doses of
steroids prescribed for cough, which has led to some of the children
becoming cushingoid.
I B Masters
Mater Misericordiae Children's Hospital, South Brisbane,
QLD 4101, Australia
but is it asthma?
Arch Dis Child
1994;
70:
1-2[Medline].
Rothenberg wonders why we did not use a control group. We chose
the cut off values in the pulmonary tests in such a way that only 5%
of the general population might show airway obstruction by chance.
Epidemiological studies have shown that bronchial hyperresponsiveness is present in the general population and that bronchial challenge testing cannot precisely separate asthmatic from non-asthmatic people
in the community.1 A paper on the prevalence of
hyperresponsiveness and symptoms in the general population in the
Netherlands showed that hyperresponsiveness was present in 16% of the
adult population2; by contrast, 42% of our population had
a low PD20 (the provocative dose causing a 20% fall in
forced expiratory volume in one second).
5.6 µmol
methacholine) when they have symptoms. For these reasons, a control
group is not necessary. We agree with Rothenberg that follow up is
important to determine prognosis for patients who cough who are and are
not given a diagnosis of asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary
disease; we hope to report the results later.
Plompstraat 3, 3815 MV Amersfoort, Netherlands
D S Postma
Department of Lung Diseases, Groningen University Hospital, PO
Box 30001, 9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands
© BMJ 1998