Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Uwe Tröger Institute of Clinical Pharmacology,
Otto-von-Guericke University, University Hospital, Leipziger
Strasse 44, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany
Correspondence to: Dr Tröger
uwe.troeger{at}medizin.uni-magdeburg.de
New electronic media such as the internet offer great
possibilities for spreading serious medical information from healthcare professionals, organisations, and authorities to the public. However, there is also a reverse side to this coin. Some companies misuse the
new medium for uncontrolled distribution of drugs that have not been
tested properly by national authorities or medical societies. These
companies deceive patients in their advertising messages. By using
citations from serious medical journals, they lead people to believe
that their drugs are "highly effective." In addition, use of such
drugs may encourage patients to abstain from the usual drugs
administered by doctors.
In response to a patient's question about the usefulness of a
multivitamin preparation in preventing and treating some cardiovascular diseases, we evaluated some of the claims made about Vitacor 20/90, which is being advertised intensively on the internet by Health Now
(San Francisco, California, USA, http://www.healthnow1.com) and is
distributed in Germany from the Netherlands.
Vitacor 20/90 consists of 35 components (see box on next page for
details). This information was available only by buying the product, as
the company did not provide product information without a purchase. The
bottle label stated that a daily dose of three tablets
was suitable for everyone aged 20-90 years;
suggested that it was useful for preventing and, as an adjunct,
treatment of coronary heart disease, high blood pressure, irregular
heart beat, heart failure, and diabetes; and that Vitacor had been
clinically tested. We wished to test the validity of these claims since
use of this product could have considerable financial and health risks. Daily use of the preparation for a year would cost an individual $350
(£234) for tablets and $475 (£316) for the drink mix.
To support its advertising statements, Health Now offers on the
internet on request a list of 40 references: "Clinical studies on
nutrients in heart disease, a reference list." Assuming that, in its
own interest, Health Now would cite cogent papers, we examined the
listed studies. As Health Now is closely connected with the name of
Mathias Rath, we also carried out a literature search for "Rath-M"
in Medline and Embase Drugs. Independently of this, we examined key
clinical studies on this topic. In our evaluation we limited ourselves
to cardiovascular diseases, vitamins C, E ( The papers by M Rath, L Pauling, and colleagues were either of
hypothetical nature or they described animal experiments or surrogate
criteria and are thus not considered here. Some of their texts were
even identified as "advertisements." The single clinical test
performed by the distributor of the product does not meet the quality
criteria for controlled clinical studies in evidence based
medicine.1 Notably, the daily dose used in the test was three times higher than the recommended daily dose printed on the
bottle.
Most of the 40 references offered by Health Now either investigated the
influence of vitamins, etc, on surrogate criteria or the papers were
only overviews. The results of the eight clinical studies that were of
interest are compared with the company's advertising statements in the
table. Certain pathological situations, such as obesity, can be
connected with reduced plasma concentrations of
Summary points
New electronic media such as the internet are used by
companies to distribute drugs uncontrollably
We examined the scientific validity of advertising
statements for Vitacor, a multivitamin preparation being heavily
advertised on the internet
In the references used to support advertising statements, we
found no proper evidence for the claimed beneficial effects on
morbidity, mortality, and quality of life associated with coronary
heart disease, heart insufficiency, high blood pressure, arrhythmia,
and diabetes
Testing of the components of the preparation was not
sufficient, and no general reduction of cardiovascular risks could be
demonstrated even for standard substances such as vitamin E,
carotene, and vitamin A
The advertising statements would raise hopes in patients that
cannot be justified from the data currently available
![]()
Product details
![]()
Proof of advertising statements in scientific literature
tocopherol), the
combination of vitamin C and vitamin A (
carotene), and clinical
studies.
tocopherol and
carotene, which is seen as an additional cause of increased
cardiovascular risk in obese people.10 However, no
general clinical benefit of vitamins C and E and carotene can be proved
from the works cited by Health
Now.
Ingredients of Vitacor 20/90 as stated on the bottle label and
amount present in the recommended daily dose of three tablets
Ingredient
Amount
Ingredient
Amount
Vitamin C:
900 mg
Magnesium
60 mg
Ascorbic acid
350 mg
L-Lysine
160 mg
Ascorbyl palmitate
250 mg
L-Carnitine
50 mg
Calcium ascorbate
150 mg
L-Arginine
65 mg
Magnesium ascorbate
150 mg
L-Cysteine
50 mg
Vitamin E
200 IU
Calcium
50 mg
Vitamin A*
2500 IU
Potassium
30 mg
Bitamin B-1
10 mg
Zinc
10 mg
Vitamin B-2
10 mg
Manganese
2 mg
Vitamin B-3:
65 mg
Copper
500 µg
Niacin
15 mg
Selenium
30 µg
Niacinamide
50 mg
Chromium
15 µg
Vitamin B-5
60 mg
Molybdenum
6 µg
Vitamin B-6
15 mg
Inositol
50 mg
Vitamin B-12
30 µg
Coenzyme Q-10
10 mg
Vitamin D
200 IU
Phosphate
20 mg
Folic acid
130 µg
Pyonogenol
10 mg
Biotin
100 µg
Citrus bioflavonoids
150 mg
L-Proline
160 mg
* carotene.
| |
Current knowledge of benefits of vitamins for cardiovascular diseases |
|---|
More recent works provide comparatively negative results. Vitamin A, retinol, carotenoids, and vitamin C did not reduce mortality from coronary heart disease in postmenopausal women.11 Vitamin E, however, did have some beneficial effects at medium doses (8-12 IU/day), but higher doses (>12 IU/day) increased the risk again.11 Health Now recommends 200 IU/day. Authors who could deduce from epidemiological investigations potential benefits from higher doses of vitamins C and E explicitly state the need for further intervention studies. 4 5 8
In the case of patients at high risk of cardiovascular disease (men
aged 50-69 who smoked and who had already had a heart attack) the risk
of dying from heart disease was clearly increased by vitamin E and
carotene, both alone and in combination, when compared with
placebo.12 In another placebo controlled study
carotene (50 mg on alternate days) taken over 12 years did not protect 22 071 male doctors aged 40-84 against cardiovascular disease
or against death from such disease.13 The combination of
carotene (30 mg/day) and vitamin A (25 000 IU/day) even led to
an increased risk of dying from cardiovascular disease compared with
placebo (odds ratio 1.26 (95% confidence interval 0.99 to 1.61)).14 As the patients receiving vitamins also died
more frequently from lung cancer, the study was ended prematurely. Multivitamins (
carotene, vitamin C, and vitamin E) had no
significant effect on the rate of angiographic restenosis or on major
clinical endpoints such as death, myocardial infarction, coronary
artery bypass grafting, and percutaneous transluminal coronary
angioplasty.15
In summary it can be said that, although some epidemiological studies
suggest that the intake of vitamins reduces the risk of getting or
dying from cardiovascular diseases, these results are inconsistent.
Intervention studies demonstrate no benefit from vitamin A, vitamin E,
or
carotene. In certain situations the patients taking the
vitamins are at greater risk than those taking placebo. There is still
a lack of prospective, double blind, randomised, controlled clinical
trials of vitamin combinations. Some are in progress now. One of the
largest will be the Oxford heart protection study, with 20 000
subjects receiving a cocktail of vitamin E, vitamin C, and
carotene or placebo over five years.
| |
Conclusions |
|---|
The uncontrolled advertising of drugs and nutritional supplements in electronic media such as the internet poses new problems for drug regulation. The distribution of these products circumvents national laws and authorities, and substances are circulated that have never been checked for effectiveness and safety. Furthermore, it is impossible to ensure correct use of such products, as patients are likely to treat themselves without consulting a doctor. In broad terms, this situation will probably lead to an increased incidence of individual damage to health.
The statement by the chairman of the BMA's general practice prescribing subcommittee, Dr Peter Fellows, that "People who have access to the internet are likely to be more intelligent and better off and not so easily duped by duff advertising"16 seems to have become obsolete. After all, it was a normal patient who asked us for detailed information about Vitacor, and who reported that the drug was introduced to her by her relatives and acquaintances, who were all enthusiastic users of this mixture. An effective mechanism to control medical advertisements in electronic media such as the internet can be established only on an international basis.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
Funding: None.
Conflict of interest: None.
| |
References |
|---|
-carotene and risk of death in middle-aged men. The Western Electric study.
Am J Epidemiol
1995;
142:
1269-1278
-tocopherol and
-carotene supplements on incidence of major coronary events in men with previous myocardial infarction.
Lancet
1997;
349:
1715-1720[Medline].(Accepted 19 June 1998)
Read all Rapid Responses
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+