Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Laura A Petersen Health Services Research and
Development, Department of Veteran's Affairs Medical Centre, Houston,
TX 77030, USA
One review could not encompass all the noteworthy recent
advances in general medicine, but research findings relevant to the treatment of HIV, congestive heart failure, prostatic hypertrophy, hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia, oestrogen replacement,
osteoporosis, cancer screening, and symptoms of the common cold
have generated particular interest.
For this review, I defined advances in general medicine as
research that might change the management of chronic disease or the
strategies to prevent disease. Given the breadth of the subject, I
asked colleagues to nominate the three to five articles published in
the previous 18 months that they believed had been most important to
the practice of general medicine.
Advances in understanding of the pathogenesis and treatment of HIV
related illness have resulted in new recommendations for antiretroviral
treatment and disease monitoring. Plasma HIV RNA concentrations are now
thought to be the most important predictor of outcome,1-3
and reductions in the viral load are associated with a reduced risk of
disease progression.4 Concerns that treatment with only
one agent is associated with rapid selection of resistant virus
variants have led to the current recommendation of a regimen
incorporating three drugs Recent advances
A comparison of two treatments for symptomatic benign prostatic
hyperplasia may change practice. When the Carvedilol, a
![]()
Methods
Top
Methods
HIV infection
Prostatic hyperplasia
Congestive heart failure
Hypertension
Hormone replacement therapy
Smear testing and hysterectomy
Common cold
References
![]()
HIV infection
Top
Methods
HIV infection
Prostatic hyperplasia
Congestive heart failure
Hypertension
Hormone replacement therapy
Smear testing and hysterectomy
Common cold
References
two nucleoside analogue reverse
transcriptase inhibitors and a protease inhibitor. All patients with
plasma HIV RNA concentrations >5000 to 10 000 copies/ml should be
given triple therapy, regardless of their CD4+ cell count. Triple
therapy is also recommended for patients with symptomatic HIV disease
or with CD4+ cell counts below 0.50 × 109/l.5 Unfortunately, these regimens are
costly, complicated, and require great commitment on the part of both
patients and health care providers. Lack of diligence in adhering to
the complex drug regimen may result in emergence of drug resistant
strains.
New recommendations for antiretroviral therapy and disease
monitoring in HIV related illness have been drawn up
Blockade may be effective in selected patients with congestive heart
failure but should not replace angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors
Systolic and diastolic blood pressures were reduced by a diet rich in
fruits, vegetables, and low fat dairy foods and low in saturated and
total fats
Reducing low density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations after
myocardial infarction was effective even in patients whose cholesterol
concentrations were average
Oestrogen replacement therapy prolongs life on average, and its
protective effect in coronary artery disease is not lost when
progestins are added
Vaginal smears after hysterectomy for benign disease have very low
positive predictive value
![]()
Prostatic hyperplasia
Top
Methods
HIV infection
Prostatic hyperplasia
Congestive heart failure
Hypertension
Hormone replacement therapy
Smear testing and hysterectomy
Common cold
References
-adrenergic blocker terazosin (10 mg daily) was compared to a 5-
-reductase inhibitor, finasteride (5 mg daily), and placebo in 1200 men, symptoms in the
terazosin group promptly improved, and the improvement persisted at one
year. The finasteride and placebo groups did not differ in the American
Urological Association's symptom score or in peak urinary flow rates
at baseline and one year.6
![]()
Congestive heart failure
Top
Methods
HIV infection
Prostatic hyperplasia
Congestive heart failure
Hypertension
Hormone replacement therapy
Smear testing and hysterectomy
Common cold
References
-adrenergic blocker, is one new treatment for
congestive heart failure. In 415 selected patients, fewer in the
treatment group died or were admitted to hospital (P=0.02), but the two
groups did not differ for mortality alone, exercise performance, or
symptoms of congestive heart failure.7 The study of left
ventricular dysfunction (SOLVD) showed that angiotensin converting
enzyme inhibitors improve symptoms and reduce mortality in congestive
heart failure,8 and now new data show that angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors reduce long term mortality in patients with congestive heart failure who have an acute myocardial infarction. In a study of 603 patients with confirmed myocardial infarction complicated by congestive heart failure, mortality was lower at three
years in the group randomised to receive angiotensin converting enzyme
inhibitors 2-9 days after infarction than in the placebo group (83 (28%) v 117 (39%) deaths, P=0.002).9
Given the expanding indications for angiotensin converting enzyme
inhibitors, losartan, an angiotensin receptor blocker, may prove useful
for patients with "captopril cough" or other side effects. A
randomised trial comparing losartan to captopril in older patients with
congestive heart failure (ejection fraction
40%) found that all
cause mortality and hospital admissions were lower with losartan than
with captopril, but there were relative few hard end points in
comparison with large studies of angiotensin enzyme
inhibitors.10 Until results of larger trials are
available, new agents should not generally be used to treat congestive
heart failure and should not be substituted for angiotensin converting
enzyme inhibitors.

View larger version (108K):
[in a new window]
First line treatment for hypertension?
| |
Hypertension |
|---|
|
|
|---|
While drugs have been the source of several interesting
developments in treatment of various clinical conditions, a recent study found that a diet rich in fruits, vegetables, and low fat dairy
foods, and with reduced saturated and total fat, reduced systolic and
diastolic blood pressures respectively by 11.4 mm Hg and 5.5 mm Hg
more than a control diet that was low in fruits, vegetables, and dairy
products and had a fat content typical of the average American
diet.11 The authors suggest that the adoption of this diet
should complement rather than supplant current
recommendations
weight control, reduced sodium chloride intake,
and reduced alcohol consumption. Since the reduction in blood pressure
was similar to that observed in trials of single drug treatments, such
a diet might be recommended as first line treatment for hypertension.
In fact, the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection,
Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure advocates such a
"stepped care" approach to treatment in its 1997 report.12
Alcohol intake and health
The relation between alcohol consumption and health has been a
popular topic in the lay press. A review of case-control and cohort
studies of alcohol consumption provides evidence that all types of
alcoholic drinks are associated with lower risk for coronary heart
disease.13 A study of alcohol intake and low density
lipoprotein cholesterol in nearly 3000 men found a strong inverse
association between alcohol intake and risk for coronary heart disease
in subjects with low density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations in
the highest fifth. Compared with abstainers, men who drank 22 or more
alcoholic beverages per week had a relative risk for coronary heart
disease of 0.2 (95% confidence interval 0.1 to 0.8; P<0.01). In the
lowest fifth (subjects with low density lipoprotein cholesterol
3.62 mmol/l), however, the inverse association between alcohol
intake and coronary heart disease was not significant,14 implying that people with low concentrations of low density lipoprotein will not benefit from consuming alcohol.
Cholesterol
A five year randomised trial of pravastatin treatment
(40 mg/day) in patients whose cholesterol concentrations after
myocardial infarction were average (less than 240 mg/dl (6.2 mmol/l)),
showed that lowering low density lipoprotein concentrations reduced
the incidence of a combined end point of fatal coronary events and non-fatal myocardial infarction. In addition, the need for
revascularisation procedures was reduced in the treatment group. The
fact that little or no effect occurred in patients with a baseline low
density lipoprotein concentration <125 mg/dl (<3.2 mmol/l) is
noteworthy.15 Taken with data from previous studies, it
seems that most patients will benefit from aspirin,
blockade,
and hydroxymethyl glutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibition after a
myocardial infarction.
Risk factors for atherosclerotic disease
Hypertension and hyperlipidaemia are well accepted risk factors
for coronary heart disease, but new risk factors for atherosclerotic disease have been proposed. In survivors of myocardial infarction, titres of Chlamydia pneumoniae antibody were correlated
with the likelihood of adverse cardiovascular outcomes.16
In another study, in which atherosclerosis was determined by direct
immunofluorescence, C pneumoniae was present in 73% of
patients with atherosclerosis who had atherectomy compared with 4% of
those who did not have atherosclerosis.17
Verifying risk factors
While many of the newly proposed risk factors for atherosclerosis
are biologically plausible, atherogenesis is probably a product of
several interacting determinants. The challenge of the next stage in
research into risk factors for atherosclerosis will be to determine how
these new risk factors interact with those identified in the past and
how to show that interventions, such as eradication of C
pneumoniae20 or folate supplements affect the
incidence and outcome of coronary heart disease.
| |
Hormone replacement therapy |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Reducing the risk for heart disease is certainly one reason for advising postmenopausal women to use oestrogen replacement therapy. An observational study documented that the protective effect of oestrogen for coronary disease is not lost when progestins are added. This protective effect was only present for the 0.625 mg dose of conjugated oestrogen and was no longer statistically significant three years after stopping treatment.22 The same group showed that hormone replacement therapy prolongs life on average, with less impressive prolongation for women who had been taking hormones for a decade or longer, for those who had not taken oestrogen for the previous five years, and for those with no cardiac risk factors.23 A predictive model using data derived from published reports showed that hormone therapy should increase life expectancy for most women, including an increase of up to 41 months for women at the greatest risk for coronary heart disease and the lowest risk for breast cancer.24 New, tissue specific oestrogens may provide the benefits of coronary disease and osteoporosis prevention without the risks for breast cancer.25
Another observational study added additional items to the "benefit" side of the counselling equation for women considering oestrogen replacement therapy. A community based cohort of 1124 elderly women was followed longitudinally. Medication use was determined and blinded neurophysiological testing at baseline and follow up were performed to assess the presence of Alzheimer's disease. Altogether 5.8% of the cohort who had ever used oestrogen replacement therapy developed Alzheimer's disease compared to 16.3% of those who had never used it (P<0.001). Importantly, the risk for Alzheimer's disease showed a dose-response effect. The risk fell as the duration of oestrogen replacement therapy increased.26
Osteoporosis
More data regarding the use of alendronate in osteoporosis are
available. In a randomised trial of postmenopausal women with low bone
mass density and at least one vertebral fracture at baseline, alendronate increased mean bone mass by up to 6.2% over placebo and
reduced the number of new fractures. The groups did not differ in
complications not related to fractures. These data are the first in
women with established osteoporosis.27
| |
Smear testing and hysterectomy |
|---|
|
|
|---|
For women who have previously undergone a hysterectomy for benign disease, there are now data that inform recommendations for cytological screening. A large study of inner city women in the southern United States showed that vaginal cytological screening after hysterectomy for benign disease had a very low positive predictive value. This result is not surprising, given the very low prevalence of cancer of the vagina.28
| |
Common cold |
|---|
|
|
|---|
And finally, until a cure for the common cold is developed we must be satisfied with an advance in treating symptoms. In a randomised trial, zinc gluconate lozenges begun in the first 24 hours after cold symptoms developed reduced the median duration of symptoms (4.4 days in the zinc group compared with 7.6 days in the placebo group; P<0.001). More patients in the intervention group noted an unpleasant taste or reported nausea, but the groups did not differ in relation to other side effects.29
|
Questions that need answers
|
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(Accepted 22 January 1998)
Read all Rapid Responses
Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.