Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Shigeru Sokejima Department of Welfare Promotion and
Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Toyama Medical and Pharmaceutical
University, 2630 Sugitani, Toyama, 930-0194, Japan
Correspondence to: Dr Sokejima
sokejima{at}ms.toyama-mpu.ac.jp
Objective: To clarify the extent to which working
hours affect the risk of acute myocardial infarction, independent of
established risk factors and occupational conditions.
The occurrence of disease that may relate to working hours is an
important consideration in Japan, where working hours have been
unusually long.1 Uehata has reported that two thirds of 203 victims of sudden death who were under occupational stresses were
working more than 60 hours a week.2 No analytical studies, however, have examined whether long working hours and changes in
working hours influence the occurrence of such cases, including those
of acute myocardial infarction.
Compared with other countries, Japan has low levels of morbidity and
mortality from acute myocardial infarction.3-5
Immigration studies have suggested that established risk factors cannot
sufficiently explain the marked differences.6 In addition,
the age adjusted mortality of acute myocardial infarction has decreased
in the past two decades in Japan, while the serum lipid profile has
deteriorated.7-9 This finding might correlate with
changes in working hours during this period.1 Psychosocial
aspects of working conditions that are thought to contribute to acute
myocardial infarction in Europe and America have not been found to
increase the risk of infarction in Japanese
populations.
10 11
Working hours per se, a simple and
universal condition across all workers, might independently contribute
to acute myocardial infarction.
In Japan the lifetime employment system has been generally adopted for
most occupations. In this system there is a tendency toward short term
fluctuations in work demand that are adjusted for largely by monthly
changes in the working hours of each worker. The sensitivity of working
hours to boom and recession is thus much higher in Japan than in
Britain and the United States. Because there is a definite seasonality
in economic activity, working hours also change during the year.
The general aim of this study was to clarify the extent to which
working hours might affect the risk of acute myocardial infarction. We
examined the hypothesis that number of working hours and changes in
working hours are involved in the onset of myocardial infarction independently of established risk factors and psychosocial factors relating to occupation and employment grade that are suspected to
increase the risk of infarction.12-14
In a pilot study, in which we recruited 125 cases with acute
myocardial infarction and 125 controls individually matched for age and
occupation, we found a significant relation between working hours and
risk of myocardial infarction.
In the present study, we recruited 199 male patients who had been
admitted to three university hospitals and one general hospital between
November 1990 and November 1993 for a first attack of acute myocardial
infarction. The diagnosis was confirmed and was defined as typical
chest pain lasting at least 20 minutes, an electrocardiogram showing ST
elevation of at least 2 mm in two or more contiguous leads with
subsequent evolution of the typical electrocardiographic changes, and
diagnostic enzyme changes. We had to remove two patients, classified as
agricultural workers, from the study because we found no control
subjects for that occupation. In addition, we removed one patient
because we could find no control with matching age. Another subject was
found to have a history of cerebrovascular stroke and was therefore
also removed from the study. Consequently, 195 patients (98%) were
included in the study.
For controls, we recruited 339 male workers free of coronary heart
disease who were matched to the cases for age (within three years) and
occupation. These men were selected at routine medical examinations
conducted at their workplace. In Japan, under the Medical Service Law,
each worker receives an annual medical examination, including an
electrocardiogram and measurement of blood pressure, serum total
cholesterol concentration, urinary glucose concentration, body weight,
and height. Therefore, these men were well informed of their health
status, including risk factors for cardiovascular diseases. We used
their occupational categories, defined in the Japanese census of 1990 (table 1), for matching.15 We sent these men
questionnaires (see below) and obtained 332 complete responses. One of
these 332 subjects was found to have a history of angina pectoris and
was therefore removed from the study. Consequently, 331 subjects (98%)
were included in the control group.
Questionnaire
![]()
Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and methods
Results
Discussion
References
Design: Case-control study.
Setting: University and general hospitals and routine
medical examinations at workplaces in Japan.
Subjects: Cases were 195 men aged 30-69 years
admitted to hospital with acute myocardial infarction during 1990-3. Controls were 331 men matched at group level for age and occupation who
were judged to be free of coronary heart diseases at routine medical
examinations in the workplace.
Main outcome measures: Odds ratios for myocardial
infarction in relation to previous mean daily working hours in a month
and changes in mean working hours during previous year.
Results: Compared with men with mean working hours of
>7-9 hours, the odds ratio of acute myocardial infarction (adjusted for age and occupation) for men with working hours of >11 hours was
2.44 (95% confidence interval 1.26 to 4.73) and for men with working
hours of
7 hours was 3.07 (1.77 to 5.32). Compared with men who
experienced an increase of
1 hour in mean working hours, the
adjusted odds ratio of myocardial infarction for men who experienced an
increase of >3 hours was 2.53 (1.34 to 4.77). No appreciable change
was observed when odds ratios were adjusted for established and
psychosocial risk factors for myocardial infarction.
Conclusion: There was a U shaped relation between the
mean working hours and the risk of acute myocardial infarction. There
also seemed to be a trend for the risk of infarction to increase with
greater increases in mean working hours.
Key messages
![]()
Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
Subjects and methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Subjects and methods
Results
Discussion
References
All the subjects completed a self administered questionnaire about
their working hours and psychosocial working conditions, cases being
given the questionnaire before their discharge from hospital. The cases
were asked for their mean working hours per day, excluding holidays and
days of rest, for each of the two months preceding their acute
myocardial infarction and for each of the months with the shortest and
longest mean daily working hours for the year before their infarction.
The controls were asked about working hours for the months before their
recruitment to the study. In Japan each worker is given a table of
salary details every month and is informed of the number of days he or she is going to work, including the overtime hours. It was therefore easy for the subjects to recall the number of hours they had worked in
earlier months. From these results we calculated the degree to which
mean working hours had changed.
Statistical analysis
We assessed associations between premorbid variables and the risk
of acute myocardial infarction by conditional logistic
regression,20 which was performed by the PHREG procedure
in the SAS statistical package.21 For this analysis, we
used occupational categories (see table 1) to separate the subjects
into matched sets. Age was used as a continuous variable for adjustment
because it was matched within three years between cases and controls.
Established risk factors for myocardial infarction and psychosocial
working conditions were assessed as categorical indicator variables
(table 1). We used analyses of variance and covariance to compare the mean working hours (adjusted for age and occupation), and the changes
in working hours during the months before myocardial infarction, of the
case and control groups. Conditional logistic regression analysis was
used to assess crude associations between mean working hours and the
risk of acute myocardial infarction.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Background characteristics
The mean ages of the 195 cases and 331 controls were 55.50 years
(SD 8.40, range 30-69) and 54.41 years (8.26, 31-72) respectively. Table 1 shows their background characteristics. Each of the established risk factors for acute myocardial infarction was associated with an
increased risk of infarction, while the psychosocial aspects of working
conditions were not associated.
|
Working hours
Table 2 shows the mean working hours of the study groups during
the months before infarction. The results for the two groups were not
significantly different, except that the shortest mean daily working
hours for a single month was significantly less for the cases. The two
groups had significantly different changes in mean daily working hours
between two months, except for the change between the month before the
infarction and the month with the longest mean working
hours.
|
7 hours) were associated
with a significantly increased risk of infarction compared with working
>7-9 hours (odds ratios 2.44 (95% confidence interval 1.26 to 4.73)
and 3.07 (1.77 to 5.32) respectively) (see figure). Adjustment for
established risk factors and psychosocial conditions did not
appreciably change these associations (table
3).
|
|
6 hours) was associated with an increased risk of
infarction compared with working >6-8 hours (odds ratio 2.71 (1.60 to
4.60)). Adjustment for established and potential risk factors did not
appreciably change the associations. There was a significant trend in
the odds ratios decreasing with increasing mean working hours (P=0.01
for odds ratios adjusted for age and occupation, P=0.02 for multiple
logistic odds ratios).
The figure shows the association between risk of myocardial infarction
and the increase in mean working hours from the month with the shortest
mean daily working hours to the month before the infarction. The odds
ratio of infarction for men who experienced an increase of >3 hours
was 2.59 (1.30-5.17) compared with men whose hours increased by
1 hour. Adjustment for established risk factors for myocardial
infarction did not appreciably change these associations (table 3).
Moreover, there was a significant trend in the odds ratios increasing
with greater increase in mean working hours (P=0.0007 for odds ratios
adjusted for age and occupation, P=0.002 for multiple logistic odds
ratios).
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This study is the first we know of to establish a relation between the mean working hours of employees and their risk of acute myocardial infarction, although we limited our data to non-fatal infarction. The risk of infarction was increased not only by unusually long working hours but also by shorter than average hours. Thus, a U shaped relation existed between mean working hours and risk of acute myocardial infarction. Because of this non-linearity, the mean working hours of the patient group was not different from that of the control group. There was also a trend for the risk of infarction to increase with greater increases in mean working hours from the month with the shortest mean working hours to the month before infarction.
Explanations of results
A possible biological explanation for long working hours eliciting
an acute myocardial infarction might be changes in the activity of the
autonomic nervous system. Work induced tension that increases
sympathetic nerve activity increases blood pressure. Blood pressure is
increased in both normotensive and hypertensive subjects while
working
the longer the working hours, the higher the daily mean blood
pressure.
22 23
In addition, reduced activity of the
parasympathetic nervous system increases the risk of coronary heart
disease.
24 25
It has been suggested that parasympathetic nerve activity is decreased by weak stressors that do not increase sympathetic nerve activity.26 Even if the stressors
encountered while working are weak, coronary risk could be increased by
attenuated vagal tone. Recent epidemiological investigations of
variations in heart rate have revealed a relation between increased
sympathetic tone and long commuting time or extensive
overtime.27 Smoking increases sympathetic nerve activity
and decreases parasympathetic nerve activity.
28 29
The
percentage of Japanese men who smoke is as high as 54%.7
For non-smokers and former smokers, environmental smoke at the
workplace might contribute to an increased risk of myocardial
infarction.
30 31
Strengths and limitations of study
Working conditions change according to employees' sex, age, and
occupation. We matched these variables between patient and control
groups. Therefore, there is little likelihood that considerable biases
about working arrangements exist between them. Because recalling
working hours by month was largely based on objective tables of salary
details, recall bias should not be a problem in our study.
Conclusions
We conclude that there was a U shaped relation between the mean
monthly working hours of our subjects and their risk of acute myocardial infarction. In addition, there seemed to be a trend for the
risk of acute myocardial infarction to increase with greater increases
in working hours. Further study is necessary to clarify the mechanism
for the U shaped association and its influence on the low morbidity and
mortality from acute myocardial infarction in
Japan.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank Professor Kazunori Kodama and Former President Itsuzo Shigematsu (Radiation Effects Research Foundation) for their useful comments.
Contributors: SS, SK, and Director Tsutomu Takata (Occupational Health Service Center, Japan Industrial Safety and Health Association, Tokyo) initiated and coordinated the formulation of the primary study hypothesis. SS and SK discussed core ideas and participated in protocol design, data collection, analysis, and writing the manuscript. Dr Kazuo Haze (Osaka City General Hospital, Osaka), Dr Akira Seki (Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo), Dr Shigeki Koda (Kochi Medical School, Kochi), Dr Masao Ishizaki (Kanazawa Medical University, Ishikawa), Dr Yoshihiro Nishimoto (Central Health Supervision Office, East Japan Railway Company, Tokyo), Dr Kazunori Kayaba (Jichi Medical School, Tochigi), and Professor Katsuo Kanmatsuse (School of Medicine, Nihon University, Tokyo) all participated in protocol design and data collection. SS and SK are guarantors for the paper.
Funding: The study was supported by grants from the Japanese Ministry of Labour.
Conflict of interest: None.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(Accepted 8 June 1998)