Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Marc J Struelens Department of Clinical
Microbiology, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 808 route de Lennik, 1070 Brussels, Belgium
marc.struelens{at}ulb.ac.be
Hospitals, and particularly intensive care units, are
an important breeding ground for the development and spread of
antibiotic resistant bacteria. This is the consequence of exposing to
heavy antibiotic use a high density patient population in frequent
contact with healthcare staff and the attendant risk of cross
infection.
1 2
Antibiotic resistance increases the
morbidity and mortality associated with infections and contributes
substantially to rising costs of care resulting from prolonged hospital
stays and the need for more expensive drugs.1-3 In this
review I will outline the current problems caused by major drug
resistant nosocomial pathogens, examine factors that promote antibiotic
resistance in hospitals, and discuss strategies for control.
Among pathogens causing hospital infections, Gram positive cocci
have become predominant over the past two decades. This trend is
related to these pathogens' capacity for accumulating antibiotic resistance determinants.2 A notable example is that of
methicillin resistant strains of Staphylococccus aureus
(MRSA), which emerged in the 1970s and increased in frequency
as hospital pathogens during the 1980s and '90s in many
countries Enterococci, commensal inhabitants of the intestinal and genital
tracts, are rising in prominence as hospital pathogens.2 This rise is related to their natural resistance to most commonly used
antibiotics and their capacity to acquire resistance to other antibiotics either by mutation (penicillins) or by transfer of resistance genes on plasmids and transposons (aminoglycosides and
glycopeptides).
2 3
In the United States acquired
vancomycin resistance has increased more than 20-fold among nosocomial
isolates of enterococci, from 0.3% in 1989 to 10% in
1995.2 This rise paralleled a massive increase in the use
of vancomycin in US hospitals and was associated with spread of
resistance plasmids and transposons among multiple strains of
Enterococcus faecium and E
faecalis.
2 11
In addition, epidemics of infection
with vancomycin resistant enterococci broke out, initially in intensive
care units and later in whole hospitals.11-13 Most of
these vancomycin resistant strains are resistant to all other effective
antimicrobials. In patients with bacteraemia due to these strains, the
mortality attributable to the infection is substantial.14
In Europe the incidence of infection caused by multiple resistant
enterococci remains lower, although several outbreaks have been
reported in transplant and intensive care units.15 About
2-5% of the population in Europe are intestinal carriers of vancomycin
resistant E faecium, presumably acquired from the food
chain.16
Summary points
The increasing incidence of hospital acquired infections caused
by antibiotic resistant pathogens has led to an increase in morbidity
and mortality
Resistance results from the interplay of micro-organisms, patients, and
the hospital environment, including antibiotic use and infection
control practices
An important cause of increasing antibiotic resistance is the selection
of resistant bacterial strains by mutation and transfer of mobile
resistance genes as a result of excessive antibiotic prescribing by
hospital doctors
Increasing antibiotic resistance is also caused by transmission of
resistant bacteria within hospitals by cross colonisation of patients
via the hands of healthcare staff and subsequent spread between
hospitals by transfer of colonised patients
Strategies to control antibiotic resistance in hospitals include
multidisciplinary cooperation in implementing local policies on use of
antibiotics and infection control measures, timely detection and
reporting of the antibiotic resistant strains, improved surveillance,
and aggressive control of transmission of epidemic resistant bacteria
![]()
The rise in antimicrobial resistance
with the notable exception of the Scandinavian countries and
the Netherlands (figure).4-7 Countries with lower
incidence of MRSA infections tend to be more restrictive in antibiotic
use, to apply strict infection control measures, and to have better
ratios of nurses to patients in their healthcare
institutions.6 The rise in MRSA infections was initially associated with epidemics in large teaching hospitals, later spreading to the general hospitals and nursing homes.7 Control
stategies, such as contact isolation precautions (for example,
systematic use of gloves, gowns, and hand antisepsis for care
procedures) and carrier decolonisation with topical antimicrobials, met
with varying degrees of success but seemed at least to slow down
transmission.6-8 Most MRSA strains are resistant to most
other antibiotics, thereby necessitating the use of glycopeptide
antibiotics, such as vancomycin. Recently, treatment failures caused by
some strains with decreased susceptibility to vancomycin (vancomycin
intermediate S aureus (VISA)) were reported in Japan and
the United States.
9 10
Infections caused by these strains
leave very few therapeutic options, and their emergence therefore adds
to the rationale for containing MRSA transmission and restricting
vancomycin use in hospitals.10

View larger version (18K):
[in a new window]
Proportion of S aureus isolates resistant to
methicillin recovered from clinical specimens of inpatients in selected
European countries. Data for hospitals are derived from Voss et
al,4 and data for intensive care units from Vincent et
al5
Multiple antibiotic resistance to useful classes of antibiotics,
including the penicillins, cephalosporins, aminoglycosides, and
fluoroquinolones, has gradually increased among a number of Gram
negative hospital pathogens, especially Klebsiella
pneumoniae,
2 17
Enterobacter
spp,
18 19
Pseudomonas
aeruginosa,20 and Acinetobacter baumannii.
21 22
Epidemic and endemic infections
caused by these multiple resistant strains followed intense antibiotic
use in many hospitals, particularly in intensive care
units.
2 18 20 22 23
In a recent European hospital
survey 23% of isolates of Klebsiellae were resistant to third
generation cephalosporins by production of plasmid encoded extended
spectrum
lactamases.17 In many cases, epidemic strains
of these Gram negative bacilli showed resistance to nearly all
available antibacterial drugs and caused serious nosocomial
infections
such as pneumonia and bacteraemia
which were
associated with increased mortality.
18-21 24
The
implementation of contact isolation measures for colonised patients or
the modification of policies on antibiotics to curtail the massive use
of drugs associated with these outbreaks, or in some cases both of
these measures, were generally effective control
measures.
2 20-22
In addition to this increasing resistance among common agents of nosocomial infection, transmission of community acquired pathogens (such as multiple resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis and M bovis) was observed in recent years in the United States and Europe in institutions caring for patients infected with HIV.25 This underlined the need for appropriate diagnostic and treatment facilities for these patients, including respiratory isolation facilities in hospitals.26
| |
Factors promoting antimicrobial resistance |
|---|
The first steps that contribute to the increasing incidence of
hospital acquired infections caused by antibiotic resistant pathogens
are the selection of resistant mutant strains from the patient's own
flora during antibiotic treatment or the transfer between bacteria of
mobile genetic determinants of resistance (plasmids and
transposons).
2 3 11 20
Subsequently, resistant strains spread among patients in
hospital.
1 2 3 7 11 12 19-21
Selection of
resistance in infecting or colonising bacteria is enhanced by factors
related to the patient: immune suppression, infection of foreign bodies
that impede local host defences, or presence of a large bacterial
inoculum as reservoir of resistant mutants.
1 2 3 7 20 21
Other predisposing factors
depend on the medical management: use of monotherapy rather than
combination therapy may favour selection of resistance in certain
infections, as will insufficiently high drug doses or an inappropriate
route of administration, which may fail to achieve bactericidal drug levels at the site of infection.
2 3 20
Alteration of the endogenous microflora during antibiotic treatment also enhances replacement of susceptible organisms by resistant strains from the
hospital microflora. Most commonly, transmission occurs as a result of
contact between patients via the contaminated hands of healthcare
staff.
1 2 7 19-21
Factors predisposing to this transmission include the length of stay in hospital, intensity and
duration of exposure to broad spectrum antibiotics, severity of
underlying illness, use of invasive devices such as intravenous catheters, or surgery.
1 7 20 21 24
Outbreaks with a
common source of multiple resistant bacteria, often caused by organisms such as Pseudomonas spp and Acinetobacter
spp, are another hazard. These are related to direct exposure
of patients to contaminated food, equipment, or fluids
for example,
during invasive procedures such as mechanical ventilation or
endoscopy.
1 7 20 21
The driving force of antibiotic resistance is the widespread use of
antibacterial drugs. More than half of patients in acute care hospitals
receive antibiotics as treatment or prophylaxis. Hospital doctors often
prescribe antibiotics excessively and inappropriately, as shown in many
studies.27 Insufficient training in infectious diseases
and antibiotic treatment, difficulty of selecting the appropriate
anti-infective drugs empirically, insufficient use of microbiological
information, need for self reassurance, and fear of litigation are
prompting the use of broad spectrum drugs.27 Likewise,
compliance of healthcare staff with basic infection control
practices
such as hand washing or disinfection
is incomplete, and
shortage of healthcare staff often makes isolation precautions difficult to implement.28
| |
Strategies for control |
|---|
Several societies have published guidelines for optimising antibiotic use and curtailing antibiotic resistance in hospitals. 27 29 30 Key components of these guidelines include multidisciplinary coordination between hospital administrators, clinicians, infectious diseases specialists, infection control teams, microbiologists, and hospital pharmacists; formulary based local guidelines on anti-infective treatment; education and regulation of prescriptors by consultant specialists; monitoring and auditing of drug use; surveillance and reporting of resistance patterns of the hospital flora; detection of patients colonised with communicable resistant bacteria and notification of these to the infection control team when isolation of the patient or decolonisation, or both, would be useful; promotion and monitoring of basic hospital infection control practices such as hand hygiene. These guidelines are based more on expert opinion and on the results of descriptive and analytical studies than on evidence from controlled trials, which are difficult to design to evaluate these types of population based intervention. Each hospital has its own ecosystem and microsociety, where determinants of antibiotic resistance are quite specific, and therefore effective solutions will need to be tailored to local epidemiological circumstances and resources.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
Competing interests: None declared.
| |
References |
|---|
-lactamases amongst Klebsiella spp from intensive care units in Europe.
J Antimicrob Chemother
1996;
38:
409-424
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+