Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Resistance stems from misguided efforts to try to sterilise our environment
Bacterial resistance to multiple antibiotics
characterises the present decade. Finding organisms insensitive to over
10 different antibiotics is not unusual. Although most of the hardier
organisms are present in hospitals, strains of multidrug resistant
bacteria, such as Streptococcus pneumoniae,
Mycobacterium tuberculosis, and Escherichia coli,
also cause serious community acquired infections. Moreover,
resistant bacteria from hospitals can be introduced into the community
via the estimated 5% of patients discharged for continued treatment at
home To understand resistance, imagine being a bacterium in a world
bombarded with antimicrobials. Living in a human, you would face
antibiotics being taken for routine infections and for non-threatening conditions like acne. As a susceptible strain you have to acquire a
survival mechanism. This is not too difficult, as your resistant counterparts, though less common, are very willing to share their antibiotic fighting strategies with you. Armed with their donated plasmids and transposons, you survive the continuous onslaught of
antimicrobials. You may sustain a mutation, rendering the antibiotic target within you resistant. Your progeny bearing the mutation survive
along with you, while your sensitive counterparts succumb and diminish
or vanish. With any one or more of these new defence mechanisms, you
are equipped to survive when introduced to new human hosts.
Should you happen to live in an animal host you face the same onslaught
since antibiotics are used heavily in animal husbandry, both as growth
enhancers and in treatment Or perhaps you have come into the home by way of a food crop. In that
environment, too, you have undergone the selective grooming afforded by
copious amounts of antimicrobials applied as pesticides. Now in the
home, along with the myriad other natural flora found there, you
encounter the subtle inhibitory effects exerted by antimicrobials
impregnated into soaps, lotions, dishwashing liquids, plastics, and
other products.3 These agents, along with disinfectants, exert their own subtle effects to further mould hardy "survivors" into a population that far outnumbers its defenceless predecessors.
You may perhaps find yourself living in yet another hostile
environment The above scenario portrays the multiple and cumulative impacts of
antimicrobial agents on the bacterial world. The message is clear Studies of newly emerging resistance show that resistance in bacteria,
as in cancer, arises in steps progressing from low level to high level,
unless a plasmid is acquired on which full blown resistance is already
present. The initial penicillin resistant pneumococci appeared with
slightly decreased susceptibility to the antibiotic but over time
evolved high level resistance. Penicillin and tetracycline resistance
among gonococci emerged in a similar way. The phenomenon has also been
observed with quinolone resistant E coli, where multiple
steps are required to reach a clinically relevant level of
resistance.4 Currently, we are witnessing the same
phenomenon with chromosomally mediated resistance to vancomycin in
S aureus.5 Decreased drug susceptibility
should be a warning to change antibiotic use to diminish selection for
resistance.
Globally we need to look at how antibiotics are used and where
resistant strains reside, since these organisms can move easily between
countries. As importantly, we need to look at the ecology in
general If a single point can be derived from our understanding of antibiotic
resistance, it is the ecological nature of the problem. To this can be
added the genetic fluidity of the bacteria. The difficulties we face
today derive from misguided efforts to try to sterilise our environment
by indiscriminately destroying bacteria when we should reserve our
killing capabilities for cases when health is threatened by infectious
strains. We should act now to restore and maintain the healthy balanced
microbiology of the pre-antibiotic era Center for Adaptation Genetics and Drug Resistance, Tufts
University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02111, USA
(slevy{at}opal.tufts.edu)
taking with them multidrug resistant Staphylococcus
aureus and vancomycin resistant enterococci. Since about half
of antibiotic usage in the developed world (and perhaps more in the
developing world) is inappropriate, there is a certain optimism that we
can reverse the resistance problem if we improve use and thus return to
an environment populated with susceptible strains.
and under this chronic selection pressure
you enhance your resistance capabilities. In the United States you may
readily become resistant to the ubiquitously used penicillins and
tetracyclines. Elsewhere you will probably be confronted with growth
promoters unique to the farm, such as avoparcin or
virginiamycin.1 These drugs, though not used in humans,
are closely related to human therapeutic drug families, such as
vancomycin and streptogramins. You might face fluoroquinolones used to
treat animals, a practice which has led to the emergence of quinolone
resistance in organisms like E coli, Salmonella spp, and
Campylobacter spp.
1 2
As you make your way
through the food chain back to a human host you carry the trademark of
your journey through the animal host
multidrug resistance.
the hospital. Armed with your multidefence mechanisms derived from human, animal, or foodcrop hosts, you are not only well
equipped to ward off the attacks of newer and more powerful drugs, but
may also share your well developed arsenal with other unarmed,
potentially infectious, travelling companions. As such, you have helped
create some of today's most resistant and feared pathogens.
we
are using too many antimicrobial drugs for the wrong reasons. Each use
can contribute to an altered microbial ecology.
the kinds of resistances in so called reservoirs, the commensal or non-clinical bacteria. They will tell us where the next
resistance problem will arise and also where antibiotic selection pressure for resistance is high. Importantly, it may not be the antibiotic itself, but other compounds, that exert the selective force.
Heavy metals, disinfectants, antibacterials, and antimicrobials
all can select for different kinds of bacteria, including those resistant to lifesaving antibiotics.
3 6
that is, one populated by a
predominantly susceptible flora.
© BMJ 1998
Read all Rapid Responses