BMJ 1998;317:609-610 ( 5 September )

Editorials

Antimicrobial resistance

Is a major threat to public health 

There is an incoming tide of concern about the problems of antimicrobial resistance. For several years alarm has been expressed in the United States,1 and the past 12 months have seen two World Health Organisation meetings prompted by increasing anxieties about the role of antimicrobials in animal husbandry2; a report by Britain's House of Lords on antimicrobial resistance; and a report from the US Institute of Medicine on emerging infections.3 This week the Danish Chief Medical Officer, Einar Krag, has called together colleagues from the European Union and their advisors for a conference on "the microbial threat" to "assess the strategies to prevent and control the emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistant micro-organisms." Is all this activity warranted? We believe it is: in the words of the House of Lords' report, "Resistance to antibiotics ... constitutes a major threat to public health and ought to be recognised as such more widely than it is at present." This issue of the BMJ is helping to broadcast this message.

The causes of these problems and gloomy portents are not difficult to find. In the past 50 years people in both the developed and developing worlds have accepted antibiotics as their right---to obtain a prescription at the first sign of a trivial infection or treat themselves with a handful of cheap antibiotics. We cannot conceive a return to the pre-antibiotic days, yet the unbridled use of these agents in man and animals is inexorably propelling us in that direction.

Most antibiotic use is in two areas: in humans in the community, and in animals for growth promotion and prophylaxis (see table). The data in the table suggest that up to 75% of antibiotic use is of questionable therapeutic value.3 What seems less controversial is the long term risk of spraying fruit trees in some parts of the world with antibiotics and adding 50-60 kg of an antimicrobial to each acre of salmon farm.4 Bacteria have evolved very sophisticated means of exchanging DNA, both within their own genus and species and across them. The widespread use of antibiotics will tilt the delicate balance between us and the bacteria.

There seems to be an inevitability about this problem. Society demands easy answers to its health problems. The increasing resistance problems of recent years are probably related to the use of increasingly broad spectrum agents (cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones) and crowding of the most vulnerable members of society in day care centres and nursing homes. These problems are compounded by the world wide phenomena of pressure on health care systems for greater efficiency, with higher bed occupancies and stretched nursing and medical care. Added to this are pressures to allow over the counter use of antibiotics in western countries so as to reduce healthcare costs. To effect change much will be required by the medical profession, politicians, the pharmaceutical industry, and not least patients.

Without doubt antibiotic prescribing in humans and animals must be prudent, but by how much must antibiotic use be reduced (10-50%?) and to what extent will this affect antibiotic resistance in different bacteria? Will we see a return to more susceptible populations or just keep the current problem in check? Some see the problem as particularly gloomy.3 There are suggestions that as resistant bacteria increase and the available antibiotics decrease transmission from inpatients to the larger population will increase and become a problem to the general public.

Certainly, the veterinary profession will be required to change practices, and we commend the House of Lords' views on the control of valuable agents in animal husbandry. There are some encouraging signs that this may be occurring: at least in developed countries, fish farming is using new techniques such as immunisation instead of antimicrobials. The Swedish experience in reducing the reliance on growth promoters shows that progression can be made without reducing production. Initial problems in the form of increased morbidity and mortality in pig and poultry production were overcome by enhancing the rearing systems.5 There is a need to keep a sharp eye on the development of resistance in animals, but not at the expense of inaction.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 

Use of antibiotics3

Secondly, both patients and doctors must reduce their expectations. Antibiotics are commonly prescribed, mainly for the respiratory tract, where the vast majority of infections are caused by viral pathogens. The pressures on both patient and doctor are easily understood: an anxious parent, a sick child, and a doctor faced with diagnostic uncertainty. The solutions are not straightforward. Patients must be educated that most such infections do not require antibiotics---that they may actually be harmful to them and their families (through their effect on beneficial bacteria in the body) and to society at large (through encouraging resistance). All this requires considerable effort and time, not easily achieved in a five minute consultation. The American Academy of Paediatrics has made a start in giving guidance to parents.6 Advances in rapid diagnosis will help to remove uncertainties.

The coming years will undoubtedly see the introduction of strict clinical guidelines on antibiotic prescribing. At present there is a tendency to concentrate on which antibiotic to use rather than question whether an antimicrobial is useful at all. More firm guidance is also required on the optimum length of treatment. In many parts of the world simple cystitis is still treated for 5-7 days and the more common chest infections for up to 14 days. The drug regulatory authorities therefore have their part to play in insisting that relevant clinical trials support the licence of an antimicrobial.

There is much discussion world wide about surveillance schemes for antimicrobial resistance.7 The major problem is gaining useful denominator data---that is, how to obtain an accurate picture of resistance in a community, be it in hospital or general practice. In hospital it is moderately straightforward, since ward based surveys can be undertaken, but in general practice we have little accurate information. As resistance rates of common pathogens can vary greatly over short distances,8 such surveillance must be undertaken both nationally, so that meaningful broad based policies can be devised, and locally, so that relevant clinical guidelines can be developed.

Greater insights are required into how resistance genes spread, especially in the community, where there is a paucity of information. Infection control procedures in child and elderly care units require enhancing. Scientific funding bodies across the European Union should realise that if we are to understand the levers which control antibiotic resistance more fundamental research will require funding. The House of Lords report highlights the problems of funding research in this area of medicine,2 which in the past has mainly come from the pharmaceutical industry.

Finally, the pharmaceutical industry, which until recently has been ahead of the resistance race, will also be well advised to increase its commitment to antimicrobial research. Indeed, now that several bacterial genomes have been sequenced, there are signs that this is occurring.9 In this issue, we trust that these and other matters have been confronted. We wish the European Union medical officers' conference well. The problems they are addressing are real and can be approached only by concerted action as bacteria respect no country's borders. The past decade has seen the progressive intercontinental spread of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus10 and penicillin resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae,11 and there are concerns about increasing resistance of Salmonella typhi.12 Parochial approaches are therefore doomed to failure.

Richard Wise, Professor of medical microbiology, Birmingham (r.wise{at}bham.ac.uk)
Tony Hart, Professor of medical microbiology, Liverpool
Otto Cars, Associate professor of infectious disease, Uppsala
Marc Streulens, Professor of clinical microbiology, Brussels
Reinen Helmuth, Professor, Berlin
Pentti Huovinen, Chief physician, Antimicrobial Research Laboratory, Turku, Finland
Marc Sprenger, Head of infectious diseases epidemiology, Bilthoven, Netherlands

Editors, antimicrobial resistance issue


  1. American Society for Microbiology. Task Force on Antimicrobial Resistance. Report. Washington, DC: ASM , 1994.
  2. House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology. 7th Report. London: Stationery Office , 1998.
  3. In: Harrison PF, Lederberg J, eds. Antimicrobial resistance: issues and options. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1998.
  4. Levy SB. The antibiotic paradox: how miracle drugs are destroying the miracle. New York: Plenum , 1992.
  5. Wierup M. Preventative methods replace antibiotic growth promoters: ten years experience from Sweden. Newsletter of the Alliance for the Prudent Use of Antibiotics 1998; 16: 2.1-4.
  6. Schwartz B, Bell DM, Hughes JM. Preventing the emergence of antimicrobial resistance. JAMA 1997; 278: 944-945[Medline].
  7. O'Brien TF. The global epidemic nature of antimicrobial resistance and the need to manage it locally. Clin Infec Dis 1997; 24(suppl 1): S2-S8.
  8. Wise R, Andrews JM. Local surveillance of antimicrobial resistance. Lancet 1998; 352: 657-658[Medline].
  9. Knowles DJC. New strategies for antibacterial drug design. Trend Microbiol 1997; 5: 379-383[Medline].
  10. Ayliffe GAJ. The progressive intercontinental spread of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Clin Infect Dis 1997; 24(suppl 1): S62-S74.
  11. Hermans PWM, Sluijter M, Defsirilert S, Lemmens N, Elzenaar K, Van Veen A. Molecular epidemiology of drug resistant pneumococci. Towards an international approach. Microb Drug Resist 1997; 3: 243-251.[Medline]
  12. Rowe B, Ward LR, Threlfall EJ. Multidrug resistant Salmonella typhi: a worldwide epidemic. Clin Infect Dis 1997; 24(suppl 1): S106-S109.


© BMJ 1998

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Articles

Maggots are useful in treating infected or necrotic wounds
S Thomas, Andrea Andrews, Mary Jones, and John Church
BMJ 1999 318: 807. [Extract] [Full Text]

Sildenafil (Viagra) is used as a recreational drug in England
Judith Aldridge and Fiona Measham
BMJ 1999 318: 669. [Extract] [Full Text]

Contributors to antibiotic resistance
M J Cheesbrough, Paul Godwin, Mario Guslandi, Andrew J Smith, Elizabeth Dickson, Kirsty M Roy, Duncan MacKenzie, Margaret S Jackson, and Jeremy Bagg
BMJ 1999 318: 669. [Extract] [Full Text]

UK strategy to cut antibiotic use outlined
Alex Brooks
BMJ 1998 317: 699. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Bugs and drugs
BMJ 1998 317: 0. [Full Text] [PDF]

Bugs and drugs
BMJ 1998 317: 0. [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Brooks, L., Shaw, A., Sharp, D., Hay, A. D (2008). Towards a better understanding of patients' perspectives of antibiotic resistance and MRSA: a qualitative study. Fam Pract 0: cmn037v1-cmn037 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Andre, M., Hedin, K., Hakansson, A., Molstad, S., Rodhe, N., Petersson, C. (2007). More physician consultations and antibiotic prescriptions in families with high concern about infectious illness adequate response to infection-prone child or self-fulfilling prophecy?. Fam Pract 24: 302-307 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Simpson, S. A., Wood, F., Butler, C. C. (2007). General practitioners' perceptions of antimicrobial resistance: a qualitative study. J Antimicrob Chemother 59: 292-296 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Olofsson, S. K., Geli, P., Andersson, D. I., Cars, O. (2005). Pharmacodynamic Model To Describe the Concentration-Dependent Selection of Cefotaxime-Resistant Escherichia coli. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49: 5081-5091 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • van der Eerden, M M, Vlaspolder, F, de Graaff, C S, Groot, T, Bronsveld, W, Jansen, H M, Boersma, W G (2005). Comparison between pathogen directed antibiotic treatment and empirical broad spectrum antibiotic treatment in patients with community acquired pneumonia: a prospective randomised study. Thorax 60: 672-678 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Hay, A. D., Thomas, M., Montgomery, A., Wetherell, M., Lovering, A., McNulty, C., Lewis, D., Carron, B., Henderson, E., MacGowan, A. (2005). The relationship between primary care antibiotic prescribing and bacterial resistance in adults in the community: a controlled observational study using individual patient data. J Antimicrob Chemother 56: 146-153 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Caminal, J., Rovira, J. (2005). Antibiotic prescription in primary health care: clinical and economic perspectives (Catalonia, Spain). Eur J Public Health 15: 276-281 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Cizman, M., Srovin, T., Pokorn, M., Cad Pecar, S., Battelino, S. (2005). Analysis of the causes and consequences of decreased antibiotic consumption over the last 5 years in Slovenia. J Antimicrob Chemother 55: 758-763 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Foladori, G. (2005). The Challenge of Infectious Diseases to the Biomedical Paradigm. Bulletin of Science Technology Society 25: 145-158 [Abstract]  
  • Coenen, S., Van Royen, P., Michiels, B., Denekens, J. (2004). Optimizing antibiotic prescribing for acute cough in general practice: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. J Antimicrob Chemother 54: 661-672 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Kummerer, K. (2004). Resistance in the environment. J Antimicrob Chemother 54: 311-320 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Carlsson, S., Govoni, M., Wiklund, N. P., Weitzberg, E., Lundberg, J. O. (2003). In Vitro Evaluation of a New Treatment for Urinary Tract Infections Caused by Nitrate-Reducing Bacteria. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47: 3713-3718 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Kahlmeter, G., Menday, P., Cars, O. (2003). Non-hospital antimicrobial usage and resistance in community-acquired Escherichia coli urinary tract infection. J Antimicrob Chemother 52: 1005-1010 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Kummerer, K. (2003). Significance of antibiotics in the environment. J Antimicrob Chemother 52: 5-7 [Full text]  
  • Decousser, J.-W., Pina, P., Picot, F., Delalande, C., Pangon, B., Courvalin, P., Allouch, P., the ColBVH study group, (2003). Frequency of isolation and antimicrobial susceptibility of bacterial pathogens isolated from patients with bloodstream infections: a French prospective national survey. J Antimicrob Chemother 51: 1213-1222 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Liebowitz, L D, Slabbert, M, Huisamen, A (2003). National surveillance programme on susceptibility patterns of respiratory pathogens in South Africa: moxifloxacin compared with eight other antimicrobial agents. J. Clin. Pathol. 56: 344-347 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Gilbert, P., McBain, A. J. (2003). Potential Impact of Increased Use of Biocides in Consumer Products on Prevalence of Antibiotic Resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 16: 189-208 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Kahlmeter, G. (2003). An international survey of the antimicrobial susceptibility of pathogens from uncomplicated urinary tract infections: the ECO{middle dot}SENS Project. J Antimicrob Chemother 51: 69-76 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Lucas, V. S., Lytra, V., Hassan, T., Tatham, H., Wilson, M., Roberts, G. J. (2002). Comparison of Lysis Filtration and an Automated Blood Culture System (BACTEC) for Detection, Quantification, and Identification of Odontogenic Bacteremia in Children. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40: 3416-3420 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Macmillan, S. (2002). Chlamydia trachomatis in subfertile women undergoing uterine instrumentation: The clinician's role. Hum Reprod 17: 1433-1436 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Kilkkinen, A., Pietinen, P., Klaukka, T., Virtamo, J., Korhonen, P., Adlercreutz, H. (2002). Use of Oral Antimicrobials Decreases Serum Enterolactone Concentration. Am J Epidemiol 155: 472-477 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Braid, J. J., Wale, M. C. J. (2002). The antibacterial activity of triclosan-impregnated storage boxes against Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Bacillus cereus and Shewanella putrefaciens in conditions simulating domestic use. J Antimicrob Chemother 49: 87-94 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Priest, P., Yudkin, P., McNulty, C., Mant, D., Wise, R. (2001). Antibacterial prescribing and antibacterial resistance in English general practice: cross sectional study Commentary: antibiotic resistance is a dynamic process. BMJ 323: 1037-1041 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Raveh, D., Levy, Y., Schlesinger, Y., Greenberg, A., Rudensky, B., Yinnon, A.M. (2001). Longitudinal surveillance of antibiotic use in the hospital. QJM 94: 141-152 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Høiby, N., Pers, C., Johansen, H. K., Hansen, H., The Copenhagen Study Group on Antibiotics in Sweat, (2000). Excretion of beta -Lactam Antibiotics in Sweat---a Neglected Mechanism for Development of Antibiotic Resistance?. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44: 2855-2857 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Coenen, S., Van Royen, P., Vermeire, E., Hermann, I., Denekens, J. (2000). Antibiotics for coughing in general practice: a qualitative decision analysis. Fam Pract 17: 380-385 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Clements, H., Stephenson, T., Gabriel, V., Harrison, T., Millar, M., Smyth, A., Tong, W., Linton, C. J (2000). Rationalised prescribing for community acquired pneumonia: a closed loop audit. Arch. Dis. Child. 83: 320-324 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Coenen, S., Van Royen, P., Vermeire, E., Hermann, I., Denekens, J. (2000). Correspondence. Fam Pract 17: 210-210 [Full text]  
  • Reacher, M. H, Shah, A., Livermore, D. M, Wale, M. C J, Graham, C., Johnson, A. P, Heine, H., Monnickendam, M. A, Barker, K. F, James, D., George, R. C (2000). Bacteraemia and antibiotic resistance of its pathogens reported in England and Wales between 1990 and 1998: trend analysis. BMJ 320: 213-216 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Peters, M., Petros, A., Dixon, G., Inwald, D., Klein, N. (1999). Acquired immunoparalysis in paediatric intensive care: prospective observational study. BMJ 319: 609-610 [Full text]  
  • Nathwani, D., Davey, P. (1999). Antibiotic prescribing—are there lessons for physicians?. QJM 92: 287-292 [Full text]  
  • Smith, S., Tilton, R. C. (1999). Antibiotic Resistance: the Bermuda Experience. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37: 1231-1232 [Full text]  
  • Kolmos, H. J., Little, P. (1999). Controversies in management: Should general practitioners perform diagnostic tests on patients before prescribing antibiotics? • For • Against. BMJ 318: 799-802 [Full text]  
  • Thomas, S, Andrews, A., Jones, M., Church, J. (1999). Maggots are useful in treating infected or necrotic wounds. BMJ 318: 807-807 [Full text]  
  • Cheesbrough, M J, Godwin, P., Guslandi, M., Smith, A. J, Dickson, E., Roy, K. M, MacKenzie, D., Jackson, M. S, Bagg, J. (1999). Contributors to antibiotic resistance. BMJ 318: 669a-669 [Full text]  
  • (1999). Tackling antimicrobial resistance. DTB 37: 9-16 [Abstract] [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Maggots and microbes
S Thomas
bmj.com, 24 Sep 1998 [Full text]



Student BMJ

Intimate examinations

Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.

www.student.bmj.com

Listen to the latest BMJ Interview