Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Poor communication puts patients at risk
EDITOR As part of the continuing post-marketing surveillance of omeprazole we
have been tracing patients from this cohort who have moved since
enrolment; we have used a postal questionnaire to ask their present
general practitioners for information on morbidity. Several general
practitioners responded and expressed their willingness to cooperate,
but stated that they were unable to help, as they could not decipher
notes written by the patient's previous general practitioner.
Having just completed a review of over 3000 patient notes, it is clear
that these are not isolated cases. They are symptomatic of the failure
of the present system of record keeping in primary care to accurately
transfer information to subsequent practitioners. The frustration to
medical researchers and the repetition of unnecessary investigations is
wasteful but the consequences of this failure for patients could be
major. The situation has been improved by investment in information
technology in many practices, and voice recognition software may hold
promise for the future. However, computer records are only as good as
the information put into them. While they are less susceptible to
misinterpretation, they are often incomplete and
unreliable3 and frequently are not printed out and
transferred with the rest of the patient's records.
We agree with Coiero and Tombs that doctors should get more training in
the use of information technology.4 Progress has been made
in training doctors to communicate with their patients. Perhaps now the
emphasis should more widely encompass communication between clinicians.
*
RS, PB, and ML are part of the Post-Marketing
Surveillance Group, which receives funding from Astra Pharmaceuticals.
Message pagers may improve communication
EDITOR The switch to primary nursing, with its objectives of improving
the accuracy of communication as well as increasing accountability,
often results in increased communication between doctors and nurses;
each primary nurse communicates directly with the doctor about the
doctor's patients. Previously this information was more likely to be
amassed and delivered all at one time by or to a nurse in charge. The
second change in working practice is the demise of the ward doctors who
spent the bulk of their time on one ward. This has arisen partially as
result of increased pressure on beds and partially subsequent to the
increased specialisation of wards and the training requirements of
junior doctors. This results in increased paging due to the absence of
the doctor from the ward, and also militates against the development of
trusting relationships between health professionals, which results in
the "just to let you know" calls that are used to dispatch
responsibility.
A method of communication which is exploited more often by senior
doctors is the message pager. This has the advantage of allowing the
sender to indicate the level of urgency of the call and the time and
mode of response required, while being less disruptive to the receiver
and permitting a range of response options. Sadly, it is perceived by
many healthcare trusts as being an expensive option, and in my
experience often has to be purchased by the individual. The alarming
inefficiency of communication demonstrated by this study shows this up
as an expensive and potentially dangerous false economy.
Gosbee's editorial on communication among health professionals
will hardly surprise anyone working in the health
service,1 and his conclusions are certainly borne out by
our recent experience, despite assertions by Kozak et al that doctors
can communicate effectively on paper.2
Paul Brettle
F D R Hobbs
Department of General Practice, Medical School, University of
Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT
M J S Langman
Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham B15 2TH
Coiera and Tombs discuss communication behaviours in hospital
settings,1 a topic important to many junior doctors. In
their discussion, however, they failed to mention the importance of two
recent changes in hospital working practices which have contributed to
an increase in the paging of junior doctors.2
Bethlem Royal Hospital and Maudsley Hospital, London SE5 8AZ
© BMJ 1998
What can you learn from this BMJ paper? Read Leanne Tite's Paper+