Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
David A Leon a Department of Epidemiology and Population
Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine,
London WC1E 7HT, b Institute of Geriatrics, University of Uppsala, S-751
25 Uppsala, Sweden, c Department of Sociology,
Stockholm University, S-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden
Correspondence to: Dr Leon dleon{at}lshtm.ac.uk
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Objective: To establish whether fetal growth rate (as
distinct from size at birth) is associated with mortality from
ischaemic heart disease.
Design: Cohort study based on uniquely detailed
obstetric records with 97% follow up over the entire life course and
linkage to census data in adult life.
Subjects: All 14 611 babies delivered at the Uppsala
Academic Hospital, Sweden, during 1915-29 followed up to end of 1995.
Main outcome measures: Mortality from ischaemic heart
disease and other causes.
Results: Cardiovascular disease showed an inverse
association with birth weight for both men and women, although this was
significant only for men. In men a 1000 g increase in birth weight was
associated with a proportional reduction in the rate of ischaemic heart
disease of 0.77 (95% confidence interval 0.67 to 0.90). Adjustment for
socioeconomic circumstances at birth and in adult life led to slight
attenuation of this effect. Relative to the lowest fourth of birth
weight for gestational age, mortality from ischaemic heart disease in
men in the second, third, and fourth fourths was 0.81 (0.66 to 0.98),
0.63 (0.50 to 0.78), and 0.67 (0.54 to 0.82), respectively. The
inclusion of birth weight per se and birth weight for gestational age
in the same model strengthened the association with birth weight for
gestational age but removed the association with birth weight.
Conclusion: This study provides by far the most
persuasive evidence of a real association between size at birth and
mortality from ischaemic heart disease in men, which cannot be
explained by methodological artefact or socioeconomic confounding. It
strongly suggests that it is variation in fetal growth rate rather than
size at birth that is aetiologically important.
|
Key messages
|
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In 1989 the first of a series of papers was published from a cohort study of men and women born in Hertfordshire in the 1920s and 1930s which suggested that cardiovascular disease, ischaemic heart disease in particular, was inversely associated with birth weight. 1 2 Since then this association has been confirmed in cohorts studies from a range of countries,3-7 as reviewed elsewhere.8 Only one study, from Gothenburg, failed to find evidence of an inverse association.9
Selection bias has been a major concern of critics who have questioned the validity of these findings. 10 11 In the Hertfordshire study, for example, results are based on the follow up of less than half of all those who made up the original birth cohort. A second concern is that the association between size at birth and mortality in adult life may be due to socioeconomic confounding.10-12 Reduced size at birth may simply be a marker for poor maternal socioeconomic circumstances that predict relative deprivation of the offspring in adult life, which leads in turn to an increased risk of ischaemic heart disease. Only two previous studies have explicitly examined this issue. 5 6
The quality and completeness of the information on size at birth in previous studies varies and is not optimal in any. Most use historical obstetric records as the source of information on size at birth, although two used self reported birth weights. 5 6 Ponderal index has been analysed in only two studies, both of which found it to be inversely associated with cardiovascular mortality. 3 7
Only three studies have included data on gestational age, each using it simply to restrict analyses to term births. 3 6 7 There has been no systematic attempt to examine whether it is the rate of fetal growth that underlies the association of size at birth with cardiovascular mortality.
We report the results of an almost complete follow up in a cohort of all people born in Uppsala Academic Hospital in 1915-29. It contains within it 600 subjects who were part of the smaller Uppsala study of 50 year old men.13-16 This new cohort has almost complete data on a wide range of dimensions at birth, gestational age, and maternal characteristics. It contains extensive information on socioeconomic circumstances of adult study members. Because of these unique features our analyses have been able to deal with all of the important shortcomings of previous studies.
| |
Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The historical cohort was based on all 14 611 births in Uppsala Academic Hospital in 1915-29. Of these, 6690 were to women resident in the city of Uppsala and 4001 were to women from parishes less than 20 km from Uppsala. The remainder were births to women living further away, many from places with direct rail links to Uppsala. The cohort covers over 75% of all births in 1915-29 to residents of Uppsala city and 50% of all births to residents of parishes <20 km from Uppsala.
Data abstracted
Sequentially numbered obstetric records for each delivery during
this period have been kept in bound volumes. Key variables abstracted
included maternal parity, age, marital status, date of last menstrual
period, birth weight, birth length, placental weight, child's sex, and
multiplicity. Complete information on all these variables was available
for 96% of subjects. Parental occupation was used to allocate each
birth to one of seven social classes,17 plus a residual
group for those for whom parental occupation was not stated (3%).
Statistical analysis
We used Cox's proportional hazards model in the STATA
statistical package to analyse the mortality data.18
Subjects exited from risk on their date of first emigration, death, or
end of follow up (31 December 1995), whichever was soonest. In all
models the time dimension was defined as age. Three periods of birth
were included (1915-9, 1920-4, and 1925-9). Birth weight (recorded to
the nearest 10 g with some heaping at 50 g and 100 g) was classified
into four categories with the same cut offs as used in our previous
work on blood pressure and birth weight.13 Ponderal index
was calculated in units of kg/m3, with birth length
recorded to the nearest cm. Gestational age in days was calculated by
using date of last menstrual period. Birth weight for gestational age
for each subject was defined as a sex specific z score calculated for
each week of gestation for the 99% of births with gestations of 30 weeks or more. Z scores were not calculated for births with shorter
gestations because of statistical imprecision arising from small
numbers. Trend tests for birth weight, birth weight for gestational
age, and ponderal index were calculated on the basis of the continuous
variables. Significance was defined as P<0.05.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Records were identified for 14 611 deliveries that had occurred from 1915 to 1929 in the Uppsala Academic Hospital, of which 418 were stillbirths. Of the live births, 14 026 were singletons; 382 (2.7%) children could not be traced; and 911 died in their first year of life. Of the total number of traced live singleton births 7012 were male and 6351 female. Among the traced births the perinatal mortality in the cohort was 50 per 1000 live births and stillbirths, and the neonatal and postneonatal rates were 30 and 36 per 1000 live births, respectively. Of the 13 282 subjects surviving to the age of 1 year, by the end of follow up (31 December 1995) 197 had emigrated, 4087 had died, and 8616 were still alive. The perinatal characteristics of the singleton live born traced subjects are shown in table 1 along with the characteristics of those who survived to age 1, 15, and 65 years.
|
The association of birth weight with mortality at different ages is
shown in table 2. The powerful association between low birth weight and
infant mortality was evident for both sexes. A more continuous inverse
association of mortality across the four birthweight categories was
evident in children (ages 1-14 years). No systematic association was
apparent at working ages, while at age
65 years among men there was
a suggestion of a reverse J shaped association of birth weight with
mortality.
|
The proportional changes in adult mortality from specific causes of death associated with an increase in birth weight of 1000 g are shown in table 3. Mortality from all neoplasms increased slightly with birth weight, although this was not significant. For all other causes, except respiratory disease, mortality decreased as birth weight increased. The largest proportional effects among men and women were for ischaemic heart disease and cerebrovascular disease, although only ischaemic heart disease among men showed a significant association.
|
The subjects born to parents in the manual social classes and those born to single mothers had increased rates of infant mortality and reduced size at birth.19 Mortality from ischaemic heart disease showed significant associations (P<0.05) with occupational status at the 1960 census, duration of education and individual earned income at the 1970 census, and household car ownership at the 1960 and 1970 censuses; mortality increased as occupational status, educational level, income, and car ownership declined (not shown). Adjustment for socioeconomic circumstances at birth and in adult life led to only a small reduction in the strength of the association between birth weight and mortality from ischaemic heart disease, which remained significant (table 4).
|
Birth weight is a function of gestational age at delivery and of fetal growth rate. In our data gestational age itself was not associated with mortality from ischaemic heart disease (not shown). Table 5 shows the strength of the association of mortality from ischaemic heart disease and fetal growth rate (measured as birth weight for gestational age z scores) and compares it with the strength of association with birth weight per se. To make the effects comparable we analysed fourths of birth weight and birth weight for gestational age.
|
The crude effects of birth weight and birth weight for gestational age were broadly similar, and both were highly significant (table 5).We were able, however, to separate the effect of birth weight per se from that of fetal growth rate by adjusting each for the effect of the other. When we did this, as shown in the final column of table 5, the effect of birth weight on mortality from ischaemic heart disease was almost entirely eliminated, while the effect of birth weight for gestational age was slightly strengthened. We therefore concluded that it is rate of fetal growth that underlies the association of birth weight with mortality from ischaemic heart disease.
Ponderal index (kg/m3) showed a significant inverse
association with mortality from ischaemic heart disease in men
(P=0.002). Among traced singleton births, the rate ratio relative to
those with a ponderal index of <25 was 0.86 (95% confidence interval
0.72 to 1.04), 0.73 (0.59 to 0.90), and 0.76 (0.59 to 1.00) for
ponderal index categories of 25.0-26.9, 27.0-28.9, and
29.0,
respectively. After simultaneous adjustment for birth weight for
gestational age, however, the effect of ponderal index was much
attenuated and no longer significant (P=0.19). The adjusted rate ratios
relative to the lowest category of ponderal index were 0.93 (0.77 to
1.13), 0.83 (0.66 to 1.05), and 0.90 (0.68 to 1.20). There was no
evidence of any association of placental weight with mortality from
ischaemic heart disease (not shown).
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We have confirmed that among men mortality from ischaemic heart disease declines as birth weight increases. Similar inverse associations were evident among women and for mortality from cerebrovascular disease in both sexes, although these associations were not significant. Other causes of death showed less pronounced inverse or weak positive associations with birth weight.
Strengths of data
A unique strength of our evidence from Uppsala is that we have
been able to observe the mortality of members of a well defined cohort
from birth to old age. The striking stability of the perinatal
characteristics of survivors of the cohort at different ages shows that
there has not been any substantial differential loss to the cohort as
follow up progressed. The associations we have described cannot thus be
explained by some sort of selection bias as has been suggested for
studies with less complete follow up.
10 11
at
birth and at the 1960 and 1970 censuses
and cover many different
dimensions of socioeconomic position. With respect to ischaemic heart
disease, our results are consistent with those reported from
Caerphilly
5 20
and the United States nurses health
study,6 which found that the effect of birth weight on
incident coronary disease and myocardial infarction persisted after
socioeconomic adjustment. We found a small attenuation of effect after
adjustment for socioeconomic circumstances at birth and in adult life,
confirming that socioeconomic confounding cannot explain the major part
of the association between size at birth and mortality from ischaemic
heart disease.
Other studies
Only three other studies have included information on gestational
age. In the Sheffield study this was available for only 822 (51%)
men,3 while in the United States nurses cohort subjects
were asked only whether or not they were born at full term or 2 or more
weeks prematurely.6 The Finnish7 and United
States nurses cohorts6 both restricted analyses to term
births. In contrast, the Uppsala birth cohort study is the first to
have complete data on gestational age, which allowed analysis of the
effect of growth rate on later mortality as distinct from weight at
birth. Our results provide for the first time direct evidence that
mortality from ischaemic heart disease is associated fetal growth
rate (measured as birth weight for gestational age) rather than with
size at birth.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank Lena Nyvall and Charlotte Freiman, whose dedication and hard work in tracing and collecting the obstetric data made a central contribution to this study; Neela Shah, who undertook early analyses of the preliminary data; and Professor Gunilla Lindmark for advice on the use of the obstetric records.
Contributors: The planning of analyses and interpretation of the data was the product of discussions involving all authors, all of whom also commented on drafts of the paper. DAL and PMMcK had the original idea for the study and oversaw its conduct together with HOL and DV. The collection of the obstetric data and the tracing through the parish archives was supervised by RM and UBL. Advice on the use of socioeconomic data at birth was provided by UBL. Advice on obtaining and using the census data was provided by DV. RM and LB undertook the construction of the study database and its cleaning and documentation. IK assisted with the development of systematic checks on the quality of the obstetric and cause of death data and its documentation. Background and interim analyses of results were carried out by IK, LB, and RM. Final analyses and drafting of the original and revised manuscripts were undertaken by DAL, who will act as guarantor.
Funding: This work was supported through grants from the UK Medical Research Council (grant No 9322050), the Swedish Council for Social Research (grant No 94/0157), and the Swedish Medical Research Council (grant No 5446). During part of her work on this study IK was in receipt of a Royal Society postdoctoral research fellowship.
Conflict of interest: None.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(Accepted 16 April 1998)
Read all Rapid Responses