Clinical review

Temporomandibular disorders: a clinical update

George Dimitroulis, clinical associate. 

School of Dental Science, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia

Correspondence to: Dr G Dimitroulis, Suite 5, 10th floor, 20 Collins Street, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia

Temporomandibular disorders is a collective term used to describe a number of related disorders affecting the temporomandibular joints, masticatory muscles, and associated structures, all of which have common symptoms such as pain and limited mouth opening. General practitioners will sometimes see patients who present with either persistent or recurrent chronic facial pain. Having eliminated the possibility of headache or ear or sinus problems, the next step is to consider the possibility of temporomandibular joint pain and dysfunction, particularly if the pain is accompanied by clicking jaw joints and limited mouth opening. This article reviews the clinical features of temporomandibular disorders and details current treatments for these.

	Methods

Top Methods Epidemiology Types of disorder Aetiology Clinical features Clinical evaluation Treatment Conclusion References

This review is based on my clinical experiences derived from the United Kingdom, the United States, and Australia, where I have developed a special interest in the management of patients with temporomandibular disorders. The published reports I have selected are from those I have collected over many years. For the Medline search, I use the following keywords: temporomandibular disorders, temporomandibular joint, internal derangement, myofascial pain dysfunction, and facial arthromyalgia.

	Epidemiology

Top Methods Epidemiology Types of disorder Aetiology Clinical features Clinical evaluation Treatment Conclusion References

About 60-70% of the general population has at least one sign of a temporomandibular disorder, yet only around one in four people with signs is actually aware of, or reports any, symptoms.^1-8 Furthermore, only about 5% of people with one or more signs of a temporomandibular disorder will actually seek treatment. ^{1 3 4 6 7} Most of those who seek treatment for temporomandibular disorders are femalethey outnumber male patients by at least four to one. ^{3 5 6} Although temporomandibular disorders may occur at any age, patients most commonly present in early adulthood. ^{1 3-8}

	Types of disorder

Top Methods Epidemiology Types of disorder Aetiology Clinical features Clinical evaluation Treatment Conclusion References

The three most common temporomandibular disorders are myofascial pain and dysfunction, internal derangement, and osteoarthrosis. Myofascial pain and dysfunction is by far the most prevalent. It is primarily a muscle disorder resulting from oral parafunctional habits such as clenching or bruxism. These habits are sometimes related to psychogenic disorders such as headache, chronic back pain, and irritable bowel syndrome. Stress, anxiety, and depression are key features of myofascial pain and dysfunction. The term internal derangement describes a temporomandibular disorder in which the articular disc (fig) is in an abnormal position, resulting in mechanical interference and restriction of the normal range of mandibular activity. Osteoarthrosis is a localised degenerative disorder that affects mainly the articular cartilage of the temporomandibular joint and is often seen in older people.

	Aetiology

Top Methods Epidemiology Types of disorder Aetiology Clinical features Clinical evaluation Treatment Conclusion References

The aetiology of the most common types of temporomandibular disorders is complex and is still largely unresolved. Malocclusion and traumawhether acute, such as after an assault, or chronic and repetitive, such as tooth grinding or clenchingare often cited as possible causes. However, there is a clear lack of substantial evidence. Psychogenic factors have also been implicated, but, like trauma and malocclusion, these are often considered as exacerbating factors rather than the primary cause of temporomandibular disorders. ^{1 2} It is well established that very few patients with malocclusion, mandibular trauma, or psychogenic related illnesses actually go on to develop temporomandibular pain and dysfunction.⁸ Hence, there is speculation that only some patients who are vulnerable to temporomandibular disorders will develop pain and dysfunction after an exacerbating event such as trauma. However, the inherent features that may help identify those patients who are especially susceptible to temporomandibular disorders remain unknown.

View larger version (36K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Anatomy of the temporomandibular joint

	Clinical features

Top Methods Epidemiology Types of disorder Aetiology Clinical features Clinical evaluation Treatment Conclusion References

There are three cardinal features of temporomandibular disordersorofacial pain, joint noise, and restricted jaw function. Pain is the most common presenting complaint and is by far the most difficult problem to evaluate.^9-11 Joint noise, however, is quite common in asymptomatic people in the general population, and is of little clinical importance in the absence of pain. ^{11 12} Restricted jaw function encompasses a limited range of mandibular movements in all directions. Like pain, restricted jaw function causes considerable anxiety for the patient, who faces difficulties in everyday activities such as eating and speaking. Patients describe either a generalised tight feeling, which is probably a muscular disorder, or the sensation that the jaw suddenly "catches" or "gets stuck," which is usually related to internal derangement.

Headaches, earaches, tinnitus, and neck and shoulder pains are just a few of a number of non-specific symptoms that are often reported by patients with temporomandibular disorders. However since these symptoms are not considered to be specific for temporomandibular disorders, other possible causes should be sought and ruled out. ^{1 2 8 13-15}

	Clinical evaluation

Top Methods Epidemiology Types of disorder Aetiology Clinical features Clinical evaluation Treatment Conclusion References

History
The main complaint may include orofacial pain, joint noises, restricted mouth opening, or a combination of these, in addition to other less specific problems such as headache and tinnitus. Pain should be evaluated carefully in terms of its onset, nature, intensity, site, duration, aggravating and relieving factors, and, especially, how it relates to the other features such as joint noise and restricted mandibular movements. More specifically, pain that is centred immediately in front of the tragus of the ear and projects to the ear, temple, cheek, and along the mandible is highly diagnostic for temporomandibular disorder. The pain may be accompanied by a click or grating sound in the preauricular region during mandibular functions such as chewing or yawning. A history of limited mouth opening, which may be intermittent or progressive, is also a key feature of temporomandibular disorders.

Clinical examination
The patient should be evaluated for tenderness in those areas of the head and neck that are accessible to palpation. Palpation is accomplished by placing the finger tips in the preauricular region just in front of the tragus of the ear. The patient is then asked to open their mouth and the finger tip will fall into the depression left by the translating condyle. Examination of the masticatory musculature may also be accomplished by digital palpation. Areas of tenderness, trigger points, and patterns of pain referral should be noted.

Investigations
Investigations are mainly required to eliminate the possibility of other abnormailties that may mimic temporomandibular disorder symptoms. ^{2 14} Despite the limitations, plain radiographs of the temporomandibular joint such as high level orthopantomograms and transcranial projections are useful ways of visualising any gross pathological, degenerative, or traumatic changes in the bony component of the temporomandibular joint complex.¹⁷ In recent years, magnetic resonance imaging has been used increasingly to investigate temporomandibular disorders, in particular, internal derangements of the temporomandibular joint. ^{18 19} Many other investigations such as computed tomography ^{20 21} and arthroscopy ^{22 23} have been advocated, but arranging these should be left to specialist oral and maxillofacial surgeons.

Diagnosis
Myofascial pain and dysfunction generally presents with diffuse pain that is cyclic and found in several sites in the head and neck, particularly the muscles of mastication. Pain is frequently worst in the morning, and the patient will often report sore teeth from clenching. There is often a history of stress and difficulty in sleeping. The patient will present with diffuse muscle tenderness and a decreased range of mandibular movements with wear facets on the teeth.

Differential diagnosis
When examining patients with suspected temporomandibular disorders, the practitioner must bear in mind the possibility of other common disorders such as dental pain; disorders of the ears, nose, and sinuses; neuralgias; headaches; and diseases of the major salivary glands all of which may mimic the symptoms of temporomandibular pain and dysfunction. What distinguishes temporomandibular disorders from other possible diseases is the pain, which is specifically centred in and around the preauricular region and may be accompanied by clicking or grating sounds with mandibular function and restricted mouth opening.

Treatment planning
The clinical course of temporomandibular disorders does not reflect a progressive disease, but rather a complex disorder moulded by many interacting factors that serve to maintain the disease. ^{1 8 12 24-26} The main goals of treatment for temporomandibular disorders are to reduce or eliminate pain or joint noises, or both, and to restore normal mandibular function. This is best achieved when other contributing factors such as stress, depression, and oral parafunctional habits (such as bruxism) are addressed and incorporated into the overall treatment strategy.²⁷ The doctor must establish whether the fundamental problem is organic or psychogenic as this will dictate treatment. Psychogenic disorders are mostly found in patients with myofascial pain and dysfunction. These patients need psychotropic medication and psychotherapy, which is described below.

	Treatment

Top Methods Epidemiology Types of disorder Aetiology Clinical features Clinical evaluation Treatment Conclusion References

Non-surgical treatment of temporomandibular disorders continues to be the most effective way of managing over 80% of patients. There are numerous non-surgical treatments for temporomandibular disorders. These involve not one but a number of different specialist practitioners who come together under the umbrella of a multidisciplinary team. Although each treatment will be discussed separately, for optimal success they are best used in combination, depending on the patient's needs. ^{1 27}

Explanation and reassurance
Probably the most important part of the treatment of temporomandibular disorders is to explain to the patient the cause and nature of the disorder, and to reassure them of the benign nature of the condition. Many patients will benefit from the reassurance that the symptoms of the temporomandibular disorder they are experiencing is not a "cancer." A thorough evaluation should effectively rule out more sinister possible causes.

Patient education and self care
A self care routine should include the following: limitation of mandibular function, habit awareness and modification, a home exercise programme, and avoiding stress. Voluntary limitation of mandibular function is encouraged to promote rest or immobilisation of muscular and articular structuresmuch the same as an athlete would rest an injured joint. Hence, the patient is advised to eat soft foods and avoid those that need a lot of chewing, and is discouraged from wide yawning, singing, chewing gum, and any other activities that would cause excessive jaw movement. Massaging the affected muscles and applying moist heat will promote muscle relaxation and help soothe aching or tired muscles. Patients should also be advised to identify the source(s) of stress, and try and change their lifestyle accordingly.

Drug treatment
If used properly as part of a comprehensive management programme, drugs can be a valuable help in relieving symptoms. ^{1 25 28 29} No single drug has been proved to be effective for all cases of temporomandibular disorders. Practitioners treating patients with temporomandibular disorders should be conversant with the different families of drugs including non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, opiates, muscle relaxants, tranquillisers, and antidepressants.

Occlusal therapy
The most common form of treatment provided by dentists for temporomandibular disorders is occlusal appliance therapy. This may be referred to as a bite raising appliance, occlusal splint, or a bite guard. It is a removable device, usually made of hard acrylic, that is custom made to fit over the occlusal surfaces of the teeth. Although occlusal appliance therapy has been shown clinically to alleviate symptoms of temporomandibular disorders in over 70% of patients, the physiological basis of the response to treatment has never been well understood. ^{30 31}

Physiotherapy
The aim of physiotherapy is to restore normal mandibular function by a number of physical techniques that serve to relieve musculoskeletal pain and promote healing of tissues.³² Close cooperation with a physiotherapist who is well versed in the management of musculoskeletal disorders of the head and neck is essential.

Behavioural therapy
Where persistent habits exacerbate or maintain the temporomandibular disorder and these cannot be modified easily by simple patient awareness, a structured programme of cognitive behavioural therapy may be required. Behavioural modification strategies may include counselling on lifestyle, relaxation therapy, hypnosis, and biofeedback.³³

Psychotherapy
Occasionally, temporomandibular disorders may be the somatic expression of an underlying psychological or psychiatric disorder such as depression or a conversion disorder. ^{34 35} The best clue to this possibility is when a patient's suffering seems to be excessive or persistent, beyond what would be normal for that condition. In these patients, referral to a psychiatrist or clinical psychologist is a mandatory part of the overall management strategy.

Surgical treatment
Published reports show that about 5% of patients undergoing treatment for temporomandibular disorders require surgery. ^{3 6} A range of surgical procedures is currently used to treat temporomandibular disorders, ranging from temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis and arthroscopy to the more complex open joint surgical procedures, referred to as arthrotomy. ^{3 7} Oral and maxillofacial surgeons with a special interest in this area often prefer patients to have undergone a period of non-surgical treatment before seeking a surgical opinion. The benefits and limitations of each of the surgical procedures are readily determined on an individual case basis. ^{36 37}

	Conclusion

Top Methods Epidemiology Types of disorder Aetiology Clinical features Clinical evaluation Treatment Conclusion References

The general medical practitioner has an important part to play in the diagnosis and management of patients with temporomandibular disorders since a substantial proportion will attend their general medical practitioner for an initial consultation. General medical practitioners should therefore be familiar with the key features of temporomandibular disorders and be prepared to play a part in managing these patients, especially in the areas of drug treatment and counselling.

	Acknowledgments

Funding: None.

Conflict of interest: None.

	References

Top Methods Epidemiology Types of disorder Aetiology Clinical features Clinical evaluation Treatment Conclusion References

1. In: McNeill C, ed. Temporomandibular disordersguidelines for classification, assessment and management. 2nd ed. , Chicago: Quintessence Books, 1993.
2. Bell WE. Orofacial pain. Classification, diagnosis, management. 4th ed. , Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishing, 1989:477-516.
3. Salonen L, Hellden L. Prevalence of signs and symptoms of dysfunction in the masticatory system: an epidemiological study in an adult Swedish population. J Craniomandibular Disord Facial Oral Pain 1990; 4: 241-250.[Medline]
4. Hannson T, Milner M. A study of occurrence of symptoms of diseases of the temporomandibular joint, masticatory musculature, and related structures. J Oral Rehabil 1975; 2: 313-324.
5. Pullinger A, Seligman DA, Solberg W. Temporomandibular joint disorders. Part 1: Functional status, dentomorphologic features and sex differences in a non patient population. J Prosthet Dent 1988; 59: 228-235[Medline].
6. Dworkin SF, Huggins KH, LeResche LR, Von Korff M, Howard J, Truelove E, et al. Epidemiology of signs and symptoms in temporomandibular disorders. I. Clinical signs in cases and controls. J Am Dent Assoc 1990; 120: 273-281[Abstract].
7. Schiffman E, Fricton JR, Haley D, Shapiro BL. The prevalence and treatment needs of subjects with temporomandibular disorders. J Am Dent Assoc 1989; 120: 295-304.
8. Greene CS, Marbach JJ. Epidemiologic studies of mandibular dysfunction: a critical review. J Prosthet Dent 1982; 48: 184-190[Medline].
9. Ohrbach R, Gale EN. Pressure pain thresholds, clinical assessment and differential diagnosis: reliability and validity in patients with myogenic pain. Pain 1989; 39: 157-169[Medline].
10. Dworkin SF, LeResche LR, DeRouen T, Von Korff M. Assessing clinical signs of temporomandibular disorders: reliability of clinical examiners. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 63: 574-579[Medline].
11. Dolwick MF. Clinical diagnosis of temporomandibular joint internal derangement and myofascial pain and dysfunction. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 1989; 1: 1-6.
12. Green CS, Laskin DM. Long term status of TMJ clicking in patients with myofascial pain dysfunction. J Am Dent Assoc 1988; 117: 461-465[Abstract].
13. Clark GT, Seligman DA, Solberg WK, Pullinger AG. Guidelines for the examination and diagnosis of temporomandibular disorders. J Craniomandibular Disord Facial Oral Pain 1989; 3: 7-14.[Medline]
14. Keith DA. Differential diagnosis of facial pain and headache. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 1989; 1: 7-12
15. Duinkerke AS, Luteijn F, Bouman TK, de Jong HP. Relations between TMJ pain dysfunction syndrome (PDS) and some psychological and biographical variables. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1985; 13: 185-189[Medline].
16. Dimitroulis G, Dolwick MF, Gremillion HA. Temporomandibular disorders. 1. Clinical evaluation. Aust Dent J 1995; 40: 301-305[Medline].
17. Hansson LG, Hansson T, Petersson A. A comparison between clinical and radiological findings in 259 temporomandibular joint patients. J Prosthet Dent 1983; 50: 89-94[Medline].
18. Kircos LT, Ortendahl DA, Mark AS, Arakawa M. Magnetic resonance imaging of the TMJ disc in asymptomatic volunteers. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1987; 45: 397-401[Medline].
19. Schellhas KP. Imaging of the temporomandibular joint. Oral Maxifillofac Surg Clin North Am 1989; 1: 13-26.
20. Raustia AM, Phytinen J, Virtanen KK. Examination of the temporomandibular joint by direct sagittal computed tomography. Clin Radiol 1985; 36: 291-296[Medline].
21. Helms CA, Morrish RB, Kircos LT, Katzberg RW, Dolwick MF. Computed tomography of the meniscus of the temporomandibular joint. Preliminary observations. Radiology 1982; 145: 719-722[Abstract/Free Full Text].
22. Sanders B, Buoncristiani R. Diagnostic and surgical arthroscopy of the temporomandibular joint: clinical experience with 137 procedures over a two year period. J Craniomandibular Disord Facial Oral Pain 1987; 1: 202-213.[Medline]
23. Bronstein SL. Diagnostic and operative arthroscopy: historical perspectives and indications. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 1989; 1: 59-68.
24. Mejerso C, Carlsson GE. Long term results of treatment for temporomandibular pain-dysfunction. J Prosthet Dent 1983; 49: 809-815[Medline].
25. Okerson JP. Management of temporomandibular disorders and occlusion. 2nd ed. St Louis: Mosby , 1989.
26. Nickerson JW, Boering G. Natural course of osteoarthrosis as it relates to internal derangement of the temporomandibular joint. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 1989; 1: 27-46.
27. Dimitroulis G, Gremillion HA, Dolwick MF, Walter JH. Temporomandibular disorders. 2. Non-surgical treatment. Aust Dent J 1995; 40: 372-376[Medline].
28. Gangarosa LP, Mahan PE. Pharmacologic management of TMJ-MPDS. Ear Nose Throat J 1982; 61: 30-41.
29. Ready LB, Hare B. Drug problems in chronic pain patients. Anesthesiol Rev 1979; 6: 28-31.
30. Clark GT. A critical evaluation of orthopedic interocclusal appliance therapy. Design theory and overall effectiveness. J Am Dent Assoc 1984; 108: 359-364[Abstract].
31. Clark GT, Adler RC. A critical evaluation of occlusal therapy. Occlusal adjustment procedures. J Am Dent Assoc 1885; 110: 743-750.
32. Clark GT, Adachi NY, Dornan MR. Physical medicine procedures affect temporomandibular disorders: a review. J Am Dent Assoc 1990; 121: 151-161[Abstract].
33. Carlsson SG, Gale EW. Biofeedback in the treatment of long-term temporomandibular joint pain: an outcome study. Biofeedback Self Regul 1977; 2: 161-165[Medline].
34. Rugh JD. Psychological components of pain. Dent Clin North Am 1987; 31: 579-594[Medline].
35. Moss RA, Adams HE. The ass of personality, anxiety and depression in mandibular pain dysfunction subjects. J Oral Rehabil 1984; 11: 233-237[Medline].
36. Dimitroulis G, Dolwick MF. Temporomandibular disorders. 3. Surgical treatment. Aust Dent J 1996; 41: 16-20[Medline].
37. Dolwick MF, Dimitroulis G. Is there a role for temporomandibular surgery? Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1994; 32: 307-313[Medline].

(Accepted 27 February 1998)