Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Alimuddin Zumla a Centre for
Infectious Diseases, University College London Medical School,
London W1P 6DB, b Imperial College
School of Medicine, National Heart and Lung Institute,
London SW3 6LY
Correspondence to: Dr
Zumla a.zumla{at}ucl.ac.uk
Tuberculosis is the leading infectious cause of death
worldwide, being responsible for 3 million deaths annually. Among
those aged over 5 years, tuberculosis kills more people than AIDS,
malaria, diarrhoea, leprosy, and all other tropical diseases combined.
The tragedy of this situation is that treating tuberculosis is one of
the most effective and cost effective of all health interventions. The
World Health Organisation has calculated that, unless urgent action is
taken, the annual number of deaths could rise from 3 million to 4 million by the year 2004.1 We urgently need improvements
in the implementation of existing strategies for tuberculosis control,
with particular emphasis on early diagnosis and delivery of effective
treatments. In addition, basic research is needed for the development
of simple and rapid diagnostic tests, more effective vaccines, and new
drugs. This article focuses on new scientific approaches to
tuberculosis control that could soon be incorporated into routine
practice. However, the impact of new approaches will be negligible if
the wealthy Western nations fail to address the gross global inequities
in healthcare provision,2 which account for the fact that
98% of deaths from tuberculosis occur in the poorer developing
countries (fig 1).
So serious is the global threat of tuberculosis that, in 1993, the WHO took the unprecedented step of declaring this disease a global
emergency.1 The problem is fuelled by the pandemic of HIV
infection and AIDS and the emergence of drug and multidrug resistance.
HIV infection renders a person infected by Mycobacterium
tuberculosis much more likely to develop overt tuberculosis,
and the evolution of the disease is considerably accelerated. At
present, about 8-10% of all cases of tuberculosis worldwide are
related to HIV infection, but the association is much more common in
many African countries, often 20% or more.4
Drug resistance is ubiquitous, although the incidence varies greatly
from region to region. Globally, about 10% of cases of tuberculosis
are resistant to one drug, and, although primary multidrug resistance
is uncommon (about 0.2%), it occurs in a median of 4.4% of previously
treated patients.5 These figures may be an underestimate,
as countries with good facilities for testing for drug resistance also
have good tuberculosis control programmes.
Potential futures
Nucleic acid technology will provide rapid, specific, and
sensitive diagnostic tests and rapid detection of drug resistance
A new vaccine able to prevent the emergence of post-primary, infectious
tuberculosis will be one of the principal means of controlling
tuberculosis
An immunotherapeutic agent used in conjunction with drug treatment will
lead to a much lower failure rate, even in cases of drug resistant
disease, and new "designer" drugs with specific anti-tuberculosis
activity will be used to treat resistant cases
Anti-HIV vaccines will reduce the burden of HIV related tuberculosis
Adequate resources to implement the directly observed therapy short
course (DOTS) strategy will be made available to developing countries
by the Western nations
The social factors responsible for the global emergency of
tuberculosis
poverty, injustice, and conflict
will be more seriously
considered and addressed
| |
Priorities for research |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The dilemma facing tuberculosis researchers and funding agencies is whether to give priority to operations research to determine the most effective ways of using the available control measures or to focus on basic research into new diagnostic tests, vaccines, and treatment regimens. Despite inadequate funding resources, much effort is being devoted to both approaches, involving a multidisciplinary approach from diverse disciplines such as molecular biology, social anthropology, and health economics.
Diagnostic tests
The traditional diagnostic tools, apart from a thorough clinical
examination, are chest radiology, which is sensitive but non-specific,
and sputum microscopy, which is specific but of limited sensitivity.
Microscopy has two advantages: it detects open, infectious cases, and
it does so rapidly. Culture is more sensitive, but several weeks elapse
before the diagnosis is made and there is an even longer wait for the
results of drug susceptibility tests. Automated systems for more
rapidly detecting growth of M tuberculosis are
available, but their cost and complexity restrict their use to major
centres.
|
Vaccines and vaccination strategies
The BCG vaccine has been used extensively since 1921, but its
contribution to disease control has been limited for two reasons.
Firstly, its protective efficacy varies considerably, from 0% to about
80%, in different regions.10 Secondly, when it is
effective it affords a high degree of protection against the serious
but usually non-infectious forms of primary tuberculosis but gives
little or no protection against the post-primary forms of the disease,
due to endogenous reactivation or exogenous reinfection, which are
responsible for transmission of the disease.
that is, those who are tuberculin negative (Heaf grades
0 and 1 and Mantoux responses of 0-4 mm)
although infants up to 3 months old may be vaccinated without prior testing.11
People with a history of BCG vaccination should be revaccinated only if
they are tuberculin negative and have no apparent BCG scar. Being a
living vaccine, BCG can cause complications in immunosuppressed people:
it should not be given to people with symptomatic HIV infection.
Because of the disadvantages of BCG, attempts are being made to develop
alternative vaccines, particularly those that can be given to people
already infected to prevent post-primary disease. These attempts are
facilitated by recent advances in the understanding of the immune
response and the ability to clone specific antigens and to manipulate
the genetic structure of mycobacteria. Approaches currently under
investigation include modified ways of administering BCG, construction
of genetically modified living vaccines, and the development of
non-viable subunit vaccines, including naked DNA.12
In addition to developing new vaccines, we will need new and rapid ways
of evaluating the efficacy of such vaccines in the community or there
will be long delays before any such vaccines become available.
The immune response
In the absence of HIV infection or other cause of
immunosuppression only about 10% of people infected by M
tuberculosis develop overt tuberculosis, indicating that the
immune response to this pathogen is usually good. There is evidence
that the immune response in those who do develop tuberculosis is not
weak but dysregulated. It is now known that helper T lymphocytes mature
along two pathways, resulting in so called Th1 and Th2 cells that are
distinguishable by the chemical messengers (cytokines) that they
release. Regulation of these Th1-Th2 type responses may be influenced
by glucocorticoids and dehydroepiandrosterone.13 The
protective immune response in tuberculosis is mediated by Th1 cells,
but a Th2 or a mixed Th1-Th2 response renders cells very sensitive to
killing by the cytokine tumour necrosis factor (TNF
), thereby
inducing the gross tissue destruction characteristic of progressive
tuberculosis (fig 2).14
|
The factors determining the pattern of T cell maturation are not fully understood, but it seems that the immune system may be programmed to respond in a certain way by past experience, including exposure to the antigens of mycobacteria present in the environment. In addition, stress and glucocorticoids tend to drive newly recruited T cells towards Th2,13 while these steroids also directly inhibit the ability of macrophages to limit the growth of M tuberculosis.15 Vaccinating a person whose immune response is inappropriately programmed may therefore not lead to protection, and this may explain why BCG fails to afford protection in some regions and may even predispose people to the disease.10 Accordingly, the vaccine of the future may be one that contains not only specific antigens but also adjuvants able to modulate the immune response.16
Treatments
Modern short course treatment regimens based on rifampicin
and isoniazid are highly effective. However, if resistance to these
drugs develops, prolonged treatment with less effective, and often more
toxic and expensive, drugs is required and the mortality is high,
especially in patients infected with HIV. There are two main approaches
towards developing new drugs: firstly, to screen many products randomly
against M tuberculosis or a related rapidly growing
mycobacterium or, secondly, to study metabolic pathways unique to this
bacillus in the hope of producing "designer drugs." The success of
either strategy cannot be predicted, so it is important to prevent the
emergence and transmission of drug resistance by effective use of
available drug treatment and appropriate control measures.
| |
Effective use of available control measures |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The paradox of the global emergency of tuberculosis despite the availability of highly effective treatment reveals gross deficiencies in its deployment.2 The principal cause of failed disease control is "non-compliance," for which the patient is usually blamed but which is usually the fault of the healthcare provider. The WHO has advocated the directly observed therapy short course (DOTS) strategy,17 a strategy that will work only if attention is given to the many social, cultural, and ethnic factors that affect the use of tuberculosis services by the community.17
The conquest of this disease will not be achieved by medical advances alone. As the powerful tools for treatment and control that are currently available have made little impact, we cannot expect any new ones to do so unless there is global political willingness to address the gross inequities of wealth and healthcare provision in society.2 While tuberculosis can affect anyone, the greatest burden of disease falls on the poor. In November 1997 the UK Department for International Development published its white paper Eliminating World Poverty: A Challenge for the 21st Century.18 This paper champions the cause of the world's poor and sets precedence to the Western nations to target their aid packages for developing countries towards achieving reductions in world poverty. If this is successful, a parallel reduction in the incidence of tuberculosis can be anticipated. Indeed, the director of the WHO global tuberculosis programme has stated: "The growing tuberculosis epidemic is no longer an emergency only for those who care about health, but for those who care about justice."1
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
a global emergency. WHO report on the TB epidemic.
Geneva: WHO
, 1994.
in T cell-mediated inflammation depends on the Th1/Th2 cytokine balance.
Immunology
1994;
82:
591-595[Medline].
Read all Rapid Responses